Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!
  1.   Become a Supporter    ::   Make a Contribution   
    Target (Recurring Monthly): $200 :: Achieved: $98

Ang Safaa Panna Page?

Discussion in 'Questions and Answers' started by ActsOfGod, May 6, 2014.

  1. ActsOfGod

    ActsOfGod
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    358
    Likes Received:
    506
    When I'm talking with people regarding SGGS, some people will use the word "Ang" to refer to a particular page. Others will use "Safaa" (which I'm guessing is an Urdu word?). I've also seen the word "Panna" to reference the page number, and of course the good old English word "page".

    Just curious about what's the most appropriate (and respectful) way to refer to page numbers from SGGS? Of course everyone will have a different opinion and it seems there is no consensus on this issue?

    Does anyone have any verifiable information on how the Guru's referenced page numbers in the SGGS?

    AoG
     
    • Like Like x 4
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads Forum Date
    What Counts As "sangat" To You? Interfaith Dialogues Mar 15, 2017
    Can Sikhi Be Relevant In The Modern World As A Driver For Social Change? Blogs Feb 22, 2017
    Aurangzeb Hard Talk Jan 14, 2017
    Difficulty Finding Raag Gurmat Sangeet Tanti Saaj Nitnem Audio And Video Gurmat Sangeet Jan 13, 2017
    Ashdoc's Movie Review---Dangal Theatre, Movies & Cinema Dec 25, 2016

  3. Sherdil

    Sherdil
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2014
    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    869
    I'm not sure about safaa, but I know that panna means leaf and ang means limb. I guess they can all be synonymously used to refer to the page number. 0:)
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Ishna

    Ishna
    Expand Collapse
    On hiatus
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,937
    Likes Received:
    4,999
    I never new 'panna' meant 'leaf'. I like that. I'm switching to 'panna'. Thanks Sherdil Ji!

    AOG: I've always used 'ang' simply because it was the word everyone else was using at the time.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  5. Gyani Jarnail Singh

    Gyani Jarnail Singh Malaysia
    Expand Collapse
    Sawa lakh se EK larraoan
    Mentor Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,627
    Likes Received:
    14,202
    semantics...nothing less..nothing more....
    What will we call the.."PAPER"..kagaz..or SKIN...since a LIMB should have skin covering...
    what will we call the INK.....lahoo..since a limb got to have red blood...

    we Sikhs have been led down the garden path away from FOLLOWING THE SHABAD..which never gets "BIRDH"..doesnt need "cremation"..never gets torn..damaged..doesnt need to float in a flood ( aka Los Angeles flood and floating plaki with sggs on it deemed miraculous) and isnt burnt in a fire...earthquake..tsunami whatever..

    The SHABAD that has to be INFUSED into our DAILY LIVES to IMPROVE what we practise daily..be SACHAIREY..truthful Living persons...not be Kartoot passu ki manas Jaat types...that INDESTRUCTIBLE ETERNAL SHABAD is being downgraded to pages..imbs..etc etc..as IF calling it a Page/Pannah saffah is somehow not respectful enough..as limb..aang..etc..

    Get out of this..and pay attention to the SHABAD !!!
    Regards to all..
     
    • Like Like x 9
  6. Hardip Singh

    Hardip Singh India
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    501
    I fully agree with your views.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. Chaan Pardesi

    Chaan Pardesi United Kingdom
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    768
    Indeed Giani ji, very well said....we have been led so well by nirmala. udasi and otehr groups, that we have have been well ingrained into such mode of thought, no different from the brahman!

    We are in 21st century, we are still relying upon half truths, of janam sakhis, then we quarell ove rthe different ones! One even told they reveal Guru Nanaks messages!!

    Considering , all were written in the 18th century, I wonder often how they all got right for 290 years simply based upon oral tradition!!!

    However they cannot it right that babas are not greater than Guru Granth sahib, and no other is equal to Guru Grnath sahib! amazing!
     
    • Like Like x 5
Since you're here... we have a small favor to ask...

More people are visiting & reading SPN than ever but far fewer are paying to sustain it. Advertising revenues across the online media have fallen fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Donating to SPN's is vote for free speech, for diversity of opinions, for the right of the people to stand up to religious bigotry. Without any affiliation to any organization, this constant struggle takes a lot of hard work to sustain as we entirely depend on the contributions of our esteemed writers/readers. We do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too... Fund our efforts and together we can keep the world informed about the real Sikh Sikhi Sikhism. If everyone who writes or reads our content, who likes it, helps us to pay for it, our future would be much more secure. Every Contribution Matters, Contribute Generously!

    Become a Supporter      ::     Make a Contribution     



Share This Page