Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

1984 Amarinder's statement is contrary to facts

Discussion in 'History of Sikhism' started by spnadmin, May 17, 2010.

  1. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    Amarinder's statement on 1984 riots contrary to facts'

    'Amarinder's statement on 1984 riots contrary to facts'

    Former Punjab chief minister Amarinder Singh has not spoken the truth in exonerating his Congress colleagues Jagdish Tytler and Kamal Nath of alleged involvement in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, according to a lawyer of the carnage victims.

    'Amarinder Singh's statement is contrary to facts. I am surprised because I know his views regarding these cases were different when he was the convener of the forum that started legal battle against Tytler,' said H.S. Phoolka, a Delhi High Court lawyer who has spearheaded a long-drawn-out campaign for justice for the victims of the 1984 carnage that followed the assassination of then prime minister Indira Gandhi.

    Phoolka said the forum that was formed in 1985 had given 'me instructions to vehemently pursue the case against Jagdish Tytler'.

    This was during the period when you were the convener,' Phoolka said in a letter to Amarinder Singh, who in an interview to a national daily Sunday said Tytler and Kamal Nath were not involved in 1984 anti-Sikh riots.

    But the victims' lawyer insists that the former chief minister was not speaking with a clear conscience.

    'You have mentioned that Nov 2 (1984), you visited Gurdwara Sis Ganj Sahib and the people named other Congress leaders and not Jagdish Tytler. (But) riots were still going on in that area on Nov 2. There was no relief camp at the gurdwara. The people, who were held up inside the gurdwara were worried about their own lives,' he said in the letter.

    Denying that Kamal Nath's name had figured in the riot cases suddenly, as Singh said in his interview, Phoolka said: 'Let me remind you that Kamal Nath's name figured in the Indian Express Nov 2, 1984, and in the Statesman Nov 3, 1984.'

    The employees of the gurdwara have named Kamal Nath. The police records also show the presence of Kamal Nath at the gurdwara Nov 1, 1984,' the lawyer said in the letter, asking Amarinder to immediately withdraw his statement.

    ]'This statement coming from a Sikh leader of your stature, would seriously hamper the campaign for justice,' he said.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads Forum Date
    Sikh News Akali Dal leaders stage dharna against Amarinder's rule: Breaking News Mar 16, 2005
    Reinstatement Of Harry Haller As SPN Moderator Announcements Jun 21, 2016
    Malaysia IGP Slammed for "Ridiculous and Arrogant" Statement on Questioning of Children Breaking News Sep 6, 2013
    USA Statement from the American Sikh Gurdwara Council Breaking News Aug 8, 2012
    1984 1984 anti-Sikh riots: Court Records Sajjan Kumar's Statement History of Sikhism Jul 19, 2011

  3. roopsidhu

    roopsidhu
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    314
    very good post
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. jasvinder121

    jasvinder121
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    7
  5. kds1980

    kds1980 India
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,504
    Likes Received:
    2,738
    Amarinder left congress after 1984 riots.He created his own party he could have become one of the respected leaders yet he chooses to go back to congress only for the sake of power.He is from royal family and every community respect and expect little more from them unfortunately he is another sell out
     

Share This Page