Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

Islam 4 Reasons Why Egypt's Revolution Is Not Islamic

Discussion in 'Interfaith Dialogues' started by spnadmin, Jan 30, 2011.

  1. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    Haroon Moghul
    Executive Director, The Maydan Institute

    Just as in the case of Tunisia, we've been caught off guard by the rapid pace of events in Egypt. Commentators are having a difficult time understanding the dynamics of the Arab world and especially the role of religion in this latest apparent revolution. Many wonder why this isn't an Islamic Revolution, and are audibly breathing a sigh of relief that it isn't -- assuming that somehow Egypt would follow Iran's rather unique trajectory in 1979 and thereafter.

    So why isn't Egypt's revolution an Islamic one? And what sets Tunisia and Egypt apart from Iran? Due to the quickly shifting nature of events, I've recorded four reasons why Egypt's uprising isn't an explicitly Islamic one.

    1) The political Islamism that ended up triumphing in Iran was a much more authoritarian interpretation of Islam. It specifically embraced political power and preached a narrative of resistance, though its victory in Iran paradoxically ended any chance of victory elsewhere. That's because when elites and other, non-religious ideological forces in neighboring Muslim countries saw the purges of prior elites taking place in Iran, they immediately became skeptical of working alongside Islamists in their own country.

    Islamic challenges to regimes in Tajikistan, Algeria and Tunisia, among others, were violently supressed even though they pursued their goals democratically. Most Islamists learned from this brutal experience and grew from it; Egypt's most powerful Muslim group, the Muslim Brotherhood, was one such group. It's probably safe to say that Iran was the only victory for this style of Islamism, and now, some 30-plus years later, its moment has largely passed. The geopolitical, economic and social reasons for its emergence have disappeared.

    2) Iran's Islamist opposition to the Shah was shaped by the peculiarities of Shi'a Islam and Iranian history. Shi'as have a more organized and powerful clergy than Sunnis, and Iran's clergy, unlike Egypt's, were much more independent of the state. In Egypt today, among the main trends in Islamic practice are a quietist Salafism, which seeks a rigorous but non-political personal morality, and the Muslim Brotherhood.

    And while the Brotherhood is an incredibly large and powerful organization, it is today a product of years of suppression, torture, and intimidation. While it seeks to change society, it does not pursue an explicitly political agenda. Rather, it believes that an ideal politics will be achieved once society is Islamized -- in other words, enough introduction of Muslim values into popular culture, and society will simply reform itself -- and that includes the state. So while they have political ideals, they certainly don't have an explicit political program.

    That said, it's no surprise that the Brotherhood weren't out ahead in the recent protests: They've largely eschewed street politics (it ends with their members electrocuted in jails). It's also worth considering, although this is still conjectural, whether the Brotherhood declined to play a more public role even after they caught up to events on the street precisely because they know a more prominent role for themselves could draw negative attention. I'm sure the Brotherhood knows that Mubarak would love to have Islamists to blame for the uprising. It would make our government support for his crackdown that much easier to obtain.

    3) People who study Iran know how vexed the relationship is, and has been, between Persian cultural identity and Islam. While many Iranians before the revolution were religious in a non-political way, the country's elite tended to see Islam and Persianness as mutually incompatible. On the other hand, Egypt is a proudly Arab society (hint: the Arab Republic of Egypt) which has never seen Islam as incompatible with their specific ethnic and national project.

    Arabness and Islam are hard to pull apart, such that the late Michel Aflaq, the founder of the Arab nationalist Ba'ath Party -- he was a Christian -- praised Islam as an achievement of the Arab cultural genius. (Many Muslims wouldn't take too kindly to such a reading, but there you have it.) That difference in dynamics between Egypt and Iran needs to be stressed.

    While Iran's Shah campaigned against Islam and sought to erase its role in Persian history and culture, Mubarak never attacked Islam with anywhere near the same vehemence. He's far more concerned with preserving power for himself than he is with rewriting Egyptian history (unfortunately for his prospects of remaining in power, he's concerned with himself--and not even for Egypt's advancement, unlike other Third World dictatorships, which do emphasize and achieve real economic growth). And this brings us to the most important point...

    4) Egypt's revolution doesn't have to be Islamic because Islam isn't at the heart of the problem on the ground. In fact, the non-political Egyptian Islam of the last few decades has succeeded in deeply Islamizing Egyptian culture, making Muslim piety interwoven with the everyday rhythms of Egyptian life. We saw this in the protests after the Friday prayers today, in the spontaneous congregational prayers that took place in the heat of demonstrations--and we can see it in the number of Egyptian women who veil (though many don't and still strongly identify with Islam, whether culturally or religiously, personally or publicly).

    Egypt's society is a deeply Muslim one, and the very success of this non-political religious project has negated the need for a confrontational Islam. Egyptians know their religious identity is not under threat. ElBaradei, for example, joined in Friday prayers today before going out into the streets. Whether Egyptians identify with political Islam or secular democracy, their Arabness and Islam tend to be mutually supportive, and certainly not incompatible.

    Where there is a danger is that if the United States does not come out explicitly in favor of the people, subsequent events will become more confrontational, and may even see the introduction of a more cultural and civilizational rhetoric. The Shah monopolized power and sought to erase a culture. Mubarak, for all his brutality, has had no such grandiose presumption.

    As an aside, I might also add that Muslim societies often have flourishing religious institutions and practices, organic and varied. But in the case of Iran, the regime paradoxically undermined that popular and organic religiosity when they sought to enforce faith through the state. This is an argument for keeping religion and politics separate in the Muslim world: in the interest of defending both from the negative effects of the other. Egypt's "secular" dictator, who didn't meddle too far into his people's religious life -- he was no Shah, and no Ben Ali -- hasn't created a sharp cultural divide in his country (the economic one is something else altogether). So why would Egyptians need, want, or stress, an Islamic Revolution?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/haroon-moghul/4-reasons-why-egypts-revo_b_815848.html
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads Forum Date
    Why Lobby? Ten Reasons to Lobby for Your Cause Get Involved Jul 13, 2010
    Leisure Top FIVE reasons “why not to breathe” Business, Lifestyle & Leisure Nov 22, 2007
    Sikh News Look beyond religion to find some reasons why honour killings go Breaking News Jan 26, 2005
    14 Good Reasons Why Society Needs Religion Spiritual Articles Sep 9, 2004
    Islam Dumbest Reasons for Converting to Islam Interfaith Dialogues Apr 21, 2011

  3. Caspian

    Caspian
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    154
    Good read :p
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Ambarsaria

    Ambarsaria Canada
    Expand Collapse
    ੴ / Ik▫oaʼnkār
    Writer SPNer Contributor Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,366
    Likes Received:
    5,657
    Sometimes they say the trend is your friend. I will dispute the rosy picture a bit.

    Trend in all Islamic countries is towards conformance, intimidation and social pressures against those who don't conform and hardliners/realous zealots having the ability to raise the passions in the flock anytime. It is a powder keg, it just has not exploded.

    The only counter balances in Islam today are the divide today between Shia_Sunni. I hope this counter balance continues to grow stronger for the remaining world population.

    There is Sunni Atom Bomb(s) in Pakistan and there will be Shia Atom Bomb(s) in Iran. May Allah guide them to use against each other before against anyone else. I know Caspian ji you don't believe in Allah but neither do Ipeacesign

    Just some thoughts.

    Sat Sri Akal
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    I do not know how one overcomes "autocratic" rule, when rule has been either theocratic, colonial, aristocratic, imperial, autocratic or dictatorial for 5000 years. And the traditions of culture and religion have been heavily top down, and driven ultimately by unquestioning adherence to a final authority. This perspective is I know the result of my own cultural experience - but not completely. The intrinsic goodness of human kind may out in this situation. However, we should also remember that the foundations of the protest are about economic stressors as much as they are about political self-determination. When the economic stressors are relieved, what will political self-determination look like? I also keep reading about anger over "Arab marginalization." What is the vision of the time when marginalization is overcome.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Ambarsaria

    Ambarsaria Canada
    Expand Collapse
    ੴ / Ik▫oaʼnkār
    Writer SPNer Contributor Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,366
    Likes Received:
    5,657
    spnadmin ji just thinking out aloud on the following,
    ... driven ultimately by unquestioning adherence to a final authority.
    ... What is their vision of the time when marginalization is overcome.

    My 2cents, it will look no different than other Arab countries where serious turmoil based on religion is not a question of "if" but when. The sheep are already tamed by the Kings, princes and Autocratic rulers (all men
    [​IMG] as it should be in Islam.). Half don't count and the other half are sheep.

    Great article below,


    http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2007/02/sunni-shia-iraq-iran-arab
    Sat Sri Akal.
     
  7. Caspian

    Caspian
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    154
    Amen :p. This is the exact scenario that played out in the book World War Z (by no means an authoritative book about anything other then zombies :p) but I found the possibility intriguing.
     

Share This Page