Sign Up |  Live StatsLive Stats    Articles 39,030| Comments 192,288| Members 20,152, Newest Ranjit75| Online 383
Home Contact
 (Forgotten?): 
    Sikhism
    For best SPN experience, use Firefox Internet Browser!


                                                                   Your Banner Here!    




Click Here to Register/Sign Up Daily Hukamnama Member Blogs Downloads Website Navigation Help Fonts Tags
Sikh Philosophy Network » Sikh Philosophy Network » Current News » People & Opinion » The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

Our Donation Goal : Why Donate? : Donate Today! : Donate Anonymously (ਗੁਪਤ) : Our Family of Supporters
Goal this month: 300 USD, Received: 50 USD (17%)
Please Donate...
       

Tags
back, brahma, delima, dilemma, give, indians, society
Reply Post New Topic In This Forum Stay Connected to Sikhism, Click Here to Register Now!
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-Jan-2010, 20:03 PM
harbansj24's Avatar harbansj24 harbansj24 is offline
 
Enrolled: Feb 19th, 2007
Location: Delhi India
Age: 65
Posts: 494
harbansj24 will become famous soon enoughharbansj24 will become famous soon enoughharbansj24 will become famous soon enoughharbansj24 will become famous soon enoughharbansj24 will become famous soon enoughharbansj24 will become famous soon enoughharbansj24 will become famous soon enoughharbansj24 will become famous soon enough
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Liked 885 Times in 351 Posts
    Nationality: India
The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

  Donate Today!   Email to Friend  Tell a Friend   Show Printable Version  Print   Contact sikhphilosophy.net Administraion for any Suggestions, Ideas, Feedback.  Feedback  

Register to Remove Advertisements
Why Indians don’t give back to society
by Aakar Patel, Mint, July 4, 2009
Some characteristics unite Indians.
The most visible is our opportunism

Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/people-and-opinion/28879-brahma-dilemma-why-dont-indians-give.html

Why don’t we worship Brahma? We know he’s part of the Hindu trinity as the creator, but we worship Vishnu, manager of the cosmos, and Shiva, its eventual destroyer. The answer lies not in religion, but in culture. But in what way does our religion shape our culture?

Weber explained the success of capitalism in the US, Germany and Britain as coming from their populations’ Protestant faith. This ethic, or culture, was missing from the Catholic populations of South America, Italy and Spain. Protestants, Weber said, extended Christianity’s message of doing good deeds, to doing work well. Industry and enterprise had an ultimate motive: public good. That explains the philanthropists of the US, from John D. Rockefeller to Andrew Carnegie to Bill Gates.


What explains the behaviour of Indians? What explains the anarchy of our cities? To find out, we must ask how our behaviour is different.


Some characteristics unite Indians. The most visible is our opportunism. One good way to judge a society is to see it in motion. On the road, we observe the opportunism in the behaviour of the Indian driver. Where traffic halts on one side of the road in India, motorists will encroach the oncoming side because there is space available there. If that leads to both sides being blocked, that is fine, as long as we maintain our advantage over people behind us or next to us. This is because the other man cannot be trusted to stay in his place.


The Indian’s instinct is to jump the traffic light if he is convinced that the signal is not policed. If he gets flagged down by the police, his instinct is to bolt. In an accident, his instinct is to flee. Fatal motoring cases in India are a grim record of how the driver ran over people and drove away.


We show the pattern of what is called a Hobbesian society: one in which there is low trust between people. This instinct of me-versus-the- world leads to irrational behaviour, demonstrated when Indians board flights. We form a mob at the entrance, and as the flight is announced, scramble for the plane even though all tickets are numbered. Airlines modify their boarding announcements for Indians taking international flights.


Our opportunism necessarily means that we do not understand collective good. Indians will litter if they are not policed. Someone else will always pick up the rubbish we throw. Thailand’s toilets are used by as many people as India’s toilets are, but they are likely to be not just clean but spotless. This is because that’s how the users leave them, not the cleaners.


The Indian’s reluctance to embrace collective good hurts his state. A study of income-tax compliance between 1965 and 1993 in India (Elsevier Science/Das- Gupta, Lahiri and Mookherjee) concluded that “declining assessment intensity had a significant negative effect” on compliance, while “traditional enforcement tools (searches, penalties and prosecution activity) had only a limited effect” on Indians. The authors puzzled over the fact that “India’s income tax performance (was) below the average of countries with similar GDP per capita”.


We do not think stealing from the state is a bad thing, and our ambiguity extends to corruption, which also we do not view in absolute terms. Political parties in India understand this and corruption is not an issue in Indian politics. Politicians who are demonstrably corrupt, recorded on camera taking a bribe or saying appalling things, or convicted by a court, can hold legitimate hope of a comeback—unthinkable in the West.



The opportunist is necessarily good at adapting, and that explains the success of Indians abroad. We can follow someone else's rules well, even if we can’t enforce them at home ourselves. The Indian in the US is peerless at the Spelling Bee because the formula of committing things to memory, which in India passes for knowledge, comes naturally to him. But this talent for adapting and memorizing is not the same as a talent for creation.


The question is: Why are we opportunists?


In his great work 'Crowds and Power', Elias Canetti observed that the rewards religions promised their faithful were all far off, in the afterlife. This is because a short goal would demand demonstration from god and create sceptics instead of believers. There is an exception to this in Hinduism. Hinduism is not about the other world. There is no afterlife in Hinduism and rebirth is always on earth. The goal is to be released entirely and our death rites and beliefs -- funeral in Kashi -- seek freedom from rebirth.


Christianity and Islam are about how to enter heaven; Hinduism is about how not to return to earth, because it’s a rotten place. Naipaul opens his finest novel with the words “The world is what it is”, and Wittgenstein (“The world is all that is the case”) opens his Tractatus similarly.


Hinduism recognizes that the world is irredeemable: It is what it is. Perhaps this is where the Hindu gets his world view -- which is zero-sum -- from. We might say that he takes the pessimistic view of society and of his fellow man. But why?


The Hindu devotee’s relationship with god is transactional: I give you this, you give me that. God must be petitioned and placated to swing the universe’s blessings towards you. God gives you something not through the miracle, and this is what makes Hinduism different, but by swinging that something away from someone else. This is the primary lesson of the Vedic fire sacrifice. There is no benefit to one without loss to another. Religion is about bending god’s influence towards you through pleas, and appeasement, through offerings.


Society has no role in your advancement and there is no reason to give back to it (in any way, including leaving the toilets clean behind you) because it hasn’t given you anything in the first place. That is why Indian industrialists are not philanthropists. Rockefeller always gave a tenth of his earnings to the Church, and then donated hundreds of millions, fighting hookworm and educating black women. Bill Gates gave $25 billion (around Rs1.2 trillion), and his cause is fighting malaria, which does not even affect Americans. Warren Buffett gave away $30 billion, almost his entire fortune. Andrew Carnegie built 2,500 libraries. Dhirubhai Ambani International School has annual fees starting at Rs47,500 (with a Rs 24,000 admission fee) and Mukesh Ambani’s daughter was made head girl.

Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=28879

An interesting thing to know is this: Has our culture shaped our faith or has our faith shaped our culture? I cannot say. To return to the question we started with: Why is Brahma not worshipped? The answer is obvious: He has nothing to offer us. What he could do for us, create the universe, he already has. There is no gain in petitioning him now.




Do you agree or disagree with the writer above? Why not share your immediate thoughts with us! Login Now! or Sign Up Today! to share your views... Gurfateh!
Reply With Quote
The following members appreciate harbansj24 Ji for the above message.
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-Jan-2010, 20:39 PM
kds1980's Avatar kds1980 kds1980 is offline
(previously Kanwardeep Singh)
 
Enrolled: Apr 4th, 2005
Location: INDIA
Age: 34
Posts: 4,481
kds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nice
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Liked 2,734 Times in 1,388 Posts
    Nationality: India
re: The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

Quote:
Rockefeller always gave a tenth of his earnings to the Church, and then donated hundreds of millions, fighting hookworm and educating black women. Bill Gates gave $25 billion (around Rs1.2 trillion), and his cause is fighting malaria, which does not even affect Americans. Warren Buffett gave away $30 billion, almost his entire fortune. Andrew Carnegie built 2,500 libraries. Dhirubhai Ambani International School has annual fees starting at Rs47,500 (with a Rs 24,000 admission fee) and Mukesh Ambani’s daughter was made head girl.
I agree that Indian rich class is very miser But I don't think that rich class of west is better .majority of wealth is still controlled by US and european Businessmen .If they are so generous then why do we still have large scale poverty in Asia and Africa .so picking out few example of some businessmen of west is not good comparison
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-Jan-2010, 20:42 PM
kds1980's Avatar kds1980 kds1980 is offline
(previously Kanwardeep Singh)
 
Enrolled: Apr 4th, 2005
Location: INDIA
Age: 34
Posts: 4,481
kds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nicekds1980 is just really nice
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Liked 2,734 Times in 1,388 Posts
    Nationality: India
re: The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

Also Muslim arab sheikhs,sultan of brunei are also known to be very rich but never heard that shiekhs being generous especially to non muslims.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-Jan-2010, 22:14 PM
BhagatSingh's Avatar BhagatSingh BhagatSingh is offline
 
Enrolled: Apr 25th, 2006
Posts: 2,807
BhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the roughBhagatSingh is a jewel in the rough
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Liked 1,589 Times in 829 Posts
    Nationality: Canada
Re: The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

Quote:
Christianity and Islam are about how to enter heaven; Hinduism is about how not to return to earth, because it’s a rotten place. Naipaul opens his finest novel with the words “The world is what it is”, and Wittgenstein (“The world is all that is the case”) opens his Tractatus similarly.
This is a rant.
All religions have a similar opinion, and this to me seems like a bigger problem than percieved by most people.

This world is where the game starts. This is it!! This is your only opportunity to make the best of it!! Yes, the game will end, but it is pretty fun while it lasts!!
"No" they say! This world is filthy, the people are filthy (those of other religions, castes, race are filthier)!!

Abrahamic faiths: We are born sick. Heaven is better. "Life" begins once you die! It's all about the after-life.
Dharmic faiths: We have probably sinned in the past lives. Merge with God, attain nirvana. we don't want to come back to this filthy place! It's all maya or an illusion or something like that.

Can we get away from this mentality??
Reply With Quote
The following members appreciate BhagatSingh Ji for the above message.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-Jan-2010, 22:14 PM
vsgrewal48895's Avatar vsgrewal48895 vsgrewal48895 is offline
 
Enrolled: Mar 12th, 2009
Location: Michigan
Age: 80
Posts: 651
vsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enoughvsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enoughvsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enoughvsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enoughvsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enoughvsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enoughvsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enoughvsgrewal48895 will become famous soon enough
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Blog Entries: 1
Liked 656 Times in 315 Posts
    Nationality: United States
Re: The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

Dear Bhagat Ji,

Yes we can get out of this mentality by making an honest attempt to become dead while alive(ਜੀਵਨ ਮੁਕਤੁ).
Hell and heaven are right here on this earth, depending upon how one is leading his life. Once someone is on the spiritual path and the veil of illusion of the lower self is lifted through Akal Purkh’s Grace, and one visualizes the Higher Self, life on earth becomes a life in heaven. Divine Knowledge makes this possible with the eradication of doubt and duality. Harmonies of heaven resound in one’s divine nature. Otherwise one lives in hell, detached from Akal Purkh’s name hidden by the veil of illusion of lower instincts.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=28879

ਨਿੰਦਾ ਹੋਇ ਤ ਬੈਕੁੰਠਿ ਜਾਈਐ ਨਾਮੁ ਪਦਾਰਥੁ ਮਨਹਿ ਬਸਾਈਐ
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=28879
Ninā ho¬ė a baikunṯẖ jā¬ī¬ai., Nām paārath maneh basā¬ī¬ai.

If I am slandered, I go to heaven; the wealth of the Naam, the Name of the Akal Purkh, abides within my mind.-----Kabir, Gauri, AGGS, Page 339-3

For full article please see;

Heaven and hell/ਭਿਸਤੁ ਅਤੇ ਦੋਜਕੁ
Contact sikhphilosophy.net Administraion for any Suggestions, Ideas, Feedback



Cordially,

Virinder

Last edited by Narayanjot Kaur; 11-Jan-2010 at 23:10 PM. Reason: Fixed an html problem from copied posts.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 31-Mar-2010, 08:37 AM
RandomX2's Avatar RandomX2 RandomX2 is offline
 
Enrolled: Sep 20th, 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2
RandomX2 is an unknown quantity at this point
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
    Nationality: Canada
Thumbs up Re: The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society?

  Donate Today!  
That was a pretty fun read, and it gave a good illustration as to the typical Indian citizen. Did you write it yourself? If so, kudos to you.

From as far as I could tell, you pinned our (using 'our', because I'm assuming you're of Indian heritage) opportunist tendencies on religion as opposed to culture. Culture was mentioned more for its influence on religion, not so much as a direct factor.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=28879
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=28879

I think culture (influenced by religion, which was still influenced by culture) is the bigger factor, not vice-versa. =/

But anyway, good stuff.
Reply With Quote
   Click Here to Donate Now!
Related Topics...
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monty Panesar: Sikhs are warriors and I'm a fighter, I’ll never give up - spinner vows to win back England place Admin Singh Sports & Fitness 0 25-Apr-2010 19:48 PM
Dilemma for Westerners: A Second Look Admin Singh New to Sikhism 45 16-Jan-2010 19:52 PM
Dilemma for Westerners? Admin Singh New to Sikhism 50 04-Aug-2009 09:18 AM
Give Me Back My Head singhbj Sikh Sikhi Sikhism 0 04-May-2008 20:28 PM


Support Us!
Become a Promoter!
Gurfateh ji, you can become a SPN Promoter by Donating as little as $10 each month. With limited resources & high operational costs, your donations make it possible for us to deliver a quality website and spread the teachings of the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, to serve & uplift humanity. Every contribution counts. Donate Generously. Gurfateh!
ReplyPost New Topic In This Forum Stay Connected to Sikhism, Click Here to Register Now!

Bookmarks


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/people-and-opinion/28879-brahma-dilemma-why-dont-indians-give.html
Posted By For Type Date
The Brahma Dilemma. Why Don't Indians Give Back to Society? - Hindu Dharma Forums This thread Refback 26-Jan-2011 21:55 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Active Discussions
What should be the AIM...
Today 07:50 AM
8 Replies, 184 Views
First Turbaned Sikh...
By Akasha
Yesterday 05:16 AM
2 Replies, 126 Views
Is Sikh Philosophy...
29-Oct-2014 19:07 PM
7 Replies, 379 Views
Destination Wedding in...
29-Oct-2014 18:41 PM
2 Replies, 122 Views
Mitee Muslaman Kee
27-Oct-2014 06:02 AM
10 Replies, 480 Views
Fools Who Wrangle Over...
23-Oct-2014 08:27 AM
1,313 Replies, 155,403 Views
5 K's: Symbolic or...
By linzer
22-Oct-2014 23:38 PM
3 Replies, 185 Views
Freshness in mouth while...
22-Oct-2014 17:56 PM
9 Replies, 446 Views
09-11-2014
19-Oct-2014 23:02 PM
4 Replies, 1,966 Views
Waheguru Simran, Nitnem,...
19-Oct-2014 22:55 PM
82 Replies, 8,387 Views
Colour Red Gursikh...
11-Oct-2014 22:22 PM
13 Replies, 539 Views
Akal Takhat Jathedar...
10-Oct-2014 06:51 AM
8 Replies, 396 Views
GGS being burnt
09-Oct-2014 10:38 AM
58 Replies, 1,867 Views
Can we ever see Sri Guru...
09-Oct-2014 06:37 AM
67 Replies, 2,366 Views
Recreated Sikh regiment...
07-Oct-2014 10:54 AM
2 Replies, 365 Views
» Books You Should Read...
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 10:18 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 Copyright © 2004-2015, All Rights Reserved. Sikh Philosophy Network


Page generated in 0.38384 seconds with 33 queries