☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Sri Guru Granth Sahib: Review Of ੴ (Ik▫oaʼnkār)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ambarsaria" data-source="post: 157836" data-attributes="member: 14194"><p>Sorry Prakash.S. Bagga ji I have no pre-conceived ideas. I started reading Prof. Sahib Singh ji’s Darpan this year.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> ੧੨੩੪੫੬੭੮੯੦</p><p>Please give me the phonetics of above in your own English </p><p></p><p>I read these as 1 ਇੱਕ (ikk) ੧, 2 ਦੋ (dō) ੨, 3 ਤਿੰਨ (tinn) ੩, 4 ਚਾਰ (chār) ੪, 5 ਪੰਜ (pañj) ੫, 6 ਛੇ (chhē) ੬, 7 ਸੱਤ (satt) ੭, 8 ਅੱਠ (aṭṭh) ੮, 9 ਨੌਂ (nauōn) ੯,</p><p></p><p>So far me1 ਇੱਕ (ikk) ੧ is right</p><p></p><p> See correct and complete at the top of the thread.</p><p></p><p></p><p> You keep quoting this line, where you think others learn from</p><p></p><p> </p><p> Sorry say again ! Where it is to be stated so it is written so. Where it is to be called 1 ਇੱਕ (ikk) ੧, it is also written so as well and context is so defined.</p><p></p><p> You keep mixing up disjointed and two elements:</p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">ਇੱਕ(ikk)੧as a number</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">‘E’ sMsik®q dw Sbd hY[E-EAM[</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">> -kwr[</li> </ul><p> Sorry there is no Ek!</p><p></p><p> So now you are saying Ek is more correct rather than saying Prof. Sahib Singh ji is wrong and Ik is wrong.</p><p> One cannot be half pregnant!</p><p> </p><p> One also does need to pay some attention to credentials. For example Prof. Sahib Singh ji below.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> <em><span style="color: blue">Where do you get Ong when Prof. Sahib Singh ji say it is <strong>“ </strong></span></em><strong><em><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'WebAkharSlim'">E-EAM “ .</span></span></em></strong></p><p> </p><p> <em><span style="color: blue">You are rehashing Prof. Sahib Singh ji’s discourses! So if the use of 1 is to simply clarify singularity/plurality of “Ong” per you why should it be phonetically sounded versus only read so.</span></em></p><p></p><p> <em><span style="color: blue">Veer ji who is Guru ji’s teacher other than the one creator. You want such to be named Guroo whereas you previously confirmed that it is GUR.</span></em></p><p> </p><p> <em><span style="color: blue">This is wrong based on the comments above.</span></em></p><p></p><p> <em><span style="color: blue">Sorry your logic flaws have been shown and the above is not supported as being based on flawed concepts.</span></em></p><p> <em><span style="color: blue"> What is this absurdity of now bringing other stuff of your own as “SYSTEM” and also calling it “creator”. Gurbani states the one creator is indefinable and you have now defined it as a system of some sort.</span></em></p><p> </p><p> <em><span style="color: blue">So can you define this system for us which is different than one creator? You may want to review the following sabad too,</span></em></p><p> </p><p> <em><span style="color: blue"><a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurmat-vichaar/37722-suk-s-gar-har-n-m.html" target="_blank">Sukẖ Sāgar Har Nām Hai / ਸੁਖ ਸਾਗਰੁ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਹੈ</a></span></em></p><p> </p><p> Sorry I find your argument and thesis unacceptable based on the above.</p><p> </p><p> <span style="color: black">I am always open to comments and corrections.</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black">Sat Sri Akal.</span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p></blockquote><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Ambarsaria, post: 157836, member: 14194"] Sorry Prakash.S. Bagga ji I have no pre-conceived ideas. I started reading Prof. Sahib Singh ji’s Darpan this year. ੧੨੩੪੫੬੭੮੯੦ Please give me the phonetics of above in your own English I read these as 1 ਇੱਕ (ikk) ੧, 2 ਦੋ (dō) ੨, 3 ਤਿੰਨ (tinn) ੩, 4 ਚਾਰ (chār) ੪, 5 ਪੰਜ (pañj) ੫, 6 ਛੇ (chhē) ੬, 7 ਸੱਤ (satt) ੭, 8 ਅੱਠ (aṭṭh) ੮, 9 ਨੌਂ (nauōn) ੯, So far me1 ਇੱਕ (ikk) ੧ is right See correct and complete at the top of the thread. You keep quoting this line, where you think others learn from Sorry say again ! Where it is to be stated so it is written so. Where it is to be called 1 ਇੱਕ (ikk) ੧, it is also written so as well and context is so defined. You keep mixing up disjointed and two elements: [LIST] [*]ਇੱਕ(ikk)੧as a number [*]‘E’ sMsik®q dw Sbd hY[E-EAM[ [*]> -kwr[ [/LIST] Sorry there is no Ek! So now you are saying Ek is more correct rather than saying Prof. Sahib Singh ji is wrong and Ik is wrong. One cannot be half pregnant! One also does need to pay some attention to credentials. For example Prof. Sahib Singh ji below. [I][COLOR=blue]Where do you get Ong when Prof. Sahib Singh ji say it is [B]“ [/B][/COLOR][/I][B][I][COLOR=blue][FONT=WebAkharSlim]E-EAM “ .[/FONT][/COLOR][/I][/B] [I][COLOR=blue]You are rehashing Prof. Sahib Singh ji’s discourses! So if the use of 1 is to simply clarify singularity/plurality of “Ong” per you why should it be phonetically sounded versus only read so.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]Veer ji who is Guru ji’s teacher other than the one creator. You want such to be named Guroo whereas you previously confirmed that it is GUR.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]This is wrong based on the comments above.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]Sorry your logic flaws have been shown and the above is not supported as being based on flawed concepts.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue] What is this absurdity of now bringing other stuff of your own as “SYSTEM” and also calling it “creator”. Gurbani states the one creator is indefinable and you have now defined it as a system of some sort.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue]So can you define this system for us which is different than one creator? You may want to review the following sabad too,[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=blue][URL="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurmat-vichaar/37722-suk-s-gar-har-n-m.html"]Sukẖ Sāgar Har Nām Hai / ਸੁਖ ਸਾਗਰੁ ਹਰਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਹੈ[/URL][/COLOR][/I] Sorry I find your argument and thesis unacceptable based on the above. [COLOR=black]I am always open to comments and corrections. Sat Sri Akal. [/COLOR][/quote] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Gurmat Vichaar
Gurmat Vichar - Discussions
Sri Guru Granth Sahib: Review Of ੴ (Ik▫oaʼnkār)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top