☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Painting Without A Canvas (part 2)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sinister" data-source="post: 75181" data-attributes="member: 2684"><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><u>Uhmm....</u></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><u>Sometimes truth overlaps with belief and sometimes it doesn't. A scientific truth (in the tradition of the scientific method) would not depend on belief, but on systematic disbelief of an hypothesis. A religious truth would depend on belief. </u></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">sounds reasonable... (whatever reasonable means)… but what is a religious truth compared to another faculty of truth?</span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><u>You are recently out of college -- so surely you remember in one science course or another - and I can't remember for sure. Are there not 4 kinds of truth? Only one coincides with belief. </u></span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I am clueless... 4 kinds of truth? </span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">i know leibniz's 'necessary truth' (the one that depends upon the principle of contradiction and disproof or “deductive proof”)</span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">Which is what they use for scientific justification</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I can also recall that he paired necessary truths with contingeant truths...these can come to realization through induction (inductive reasoning)? </span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">These are both called logical truths…because they are derived from logic</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I guess there could also be social or moral truths…defined by society again with overlap.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I'm guessing </span></span><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">these faculties of Truth overlap and become really complex...nearly impossible to tell the difference between necessary truths and contingeant truth in most instances.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><u><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">We can talk about knowledge later -- makes the thread stay in play longer.</span></span></u></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><u>So to get to my bottom line -- the circles have to be re-arranged. Or not?</u></span></span></p><p><u><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'">I will see if I can figure this out -- maybe William James......</span></span></u></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">I guess the bigger question I would like to ask here is… did our guru’s believe ‘knowledge’ is a psychological construct (internalists) or a set physical quantification (externalists)? Or both?</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Or is this question heretical and offensive?</span></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Sinister, post: 75181, member: 2684"] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma][U]Uhmm....[/U][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma][U]Sometimes truth overlaps with belief and sometimes it doesn't. A scientific truth (in the tradition of the scientific method) would not depend on belief, but on systematic disbelief of an hypothesis. A religious truth would depend on belief. [/quote][/U][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]sounds reasonable... (whatever reasonable means)… but what is a religious truth compared to another faculty of truth?[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma][U]You are recently out of college -- so surely you remember in one science course or another - and I can't remember for sure. Are there not 4 kinds of truth? Only one coincides with belief. [/U][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]I am clueless... 4 kinds of truth? [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]i know leibniz's 'necessary truth' (the one that depends upon the principle of contradiction and disproof or “deductive proof”)[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]Which is what they use for scientific justification[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]I can also recall that he paired necessary truths with contingeant truths...these can come to realization through induction (inductive reasoning)? [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]These are both called logical truths…because they are derived from logic[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]I guess there could also be social or moral truths…defined by society again with overlap.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]I'm guessing [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]these faculties of Truth overlap and become really complex...nearly impossible to tell the difference between necessary truths and contingeant truth in most instances.[/FONT][/COLOR] [U][COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]We can talk about knowledge later -- makes the thread stay in play longer.[/FONT][/COLOR][/U] [COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma][U]So to get to my bottom line -- the circles have to be re-arranged. Or not?[/U][/FONT][/COLOR] [U][COLOR=black][FONT=Tahoma]I will see if I can figure this out -- maybe William James......[/FONT][/COLOR][/U] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]I guess the bigger question I would like to ask here is… did our guru’s believe ‘knowledge’ is a psychological construct (internalists) or a set physical quantification (externalists)? Or both?[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman]Or is this question heretical and offensive?[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Painting Without A Canvas (part 2)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top