☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ISDhillon" data-source="post: 21753" data-attributes="member: 1987"><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Jass Singh Ji :8-<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">So now your getting rude that’s ok I don’t mind, however a large portion of your new message is the same logic…reason…yadaa yadaaa yadaa, when I communicate I am not using logic I am using grammatical construction but only to convey that logic is incorrect and you have been unable to show how the sikh doctrine does breakdown because you know very well it involves a paradigm shift in thinking, say what you may but this doctrine is irrefutable and therefore the only true religious doctrine, plenty of people have rebutted the Christian doctrine by playing what you call “normal debating rules” but I cant even start to do that because I believe that the bible is man made and I need hard proof that it is not.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">You then go on to twist the highly esteemed scholar and most authoritative on Sikhism by saying that sikhsim does not claim to be the final word of god then call that laughable and guess what I will share in your laughter but only at your ignorance, you see we are not a totalitarian faith no one can fully sing the praises of god and all religions ARE EQUAL, you then profess your sophistication by claiming that transcendental phenomenon is a part of logic and reason but the dawn of post-modernism is enough to make you choke your words. Your last post was a great failure it’s a rehash of everything you have said in all your other posts and the reason why you continue to respond is not to correct me but because you know I have got you by the short and curlies and guess what I never had to do a course in critical thinking I just accept the infallibility of truth which is bani..</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Have some respect for the Sikh scholar who has portrayed the sovereignty of the Sikh doctrine don’t argue with it just convert, because tomorrow onwards I may become silent and refuse to engage in logical debate, but the doctrine still exists and works this is why a famous scholar called Cunningham said that “Sikhs are bound by an objective known only to them” our basic category is spirit and this you will have to obey and I am going to continue in this path because I know that I am not living in hope I have the truth with me when I practice my faith I have a subjective experience and when you have those experiences people like you are just momentary experiences but the inner experiences is forever. And how very convenient that you bring up the other scholar who if I remember correctly actually contradicted you by calling reason divine hukum and that reason in sggs was used for social reform do you really think she means reason in the sense of apologetics I think not you would get a severe beating if you were to try your tactics on any of those scholars they wont stand for your intellectual rubbish you’ll be done and dusted in next to no time.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">You then say you cant have truth without logic and fail to understand that sat is spirit which is ultimate reality therefore sach is something that is right the 2 are totally different, something that is right is not true its just right, because some people will say that having premarital sex is wrong but others may say its fine, truth has no hand in this, this is a sikh perspective not a Christian one. We are told certain rights and wrong in religion but that is not the true path but the most righteous one. You then second guess the mind of guru ji by saying the gurus would never have thrown out intellect even though the purpose of sikhsim is self-realisation which requires no intellect this is blasphemy of the guru and then you introduce words like fideism which I couldn’t care less about and no one is interested in Sikhism to find objective truth but to create a harmonious world of gurmukhs, something the church of hate could do with.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Then you state in you lengthy paragraph on self-realisation that we are in some way deceiving ourselves because “how do you know?” – answer: because the guru says so! And that is enough for us you my dear friend are actually a sleep, and devoid of religion also for that matter, religion is not about living in hope that is false merriment, religion is about becoming glory and that you aint.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Now I have tried my best to help you by showing you the true sikh path but instead you throw the baby out with the bathwater and bring in insults if you can prove the doctrine wrong then do it and make haste, all I have done is for your own rehabilitation you are living a life of unholy and you are free to do so because I believe in the sovereignity of man therefore you are entitled to your faith, but you have failed to enlighten me. I think what I am saying is that you must play by our own rules if you would like a sikh perspective otherwise the only option left is for you to visit a non-sikh forum because otherwise why would you be even on this forum asking us to provide you for a sikh perspective when you reject it out right, we don’t need to know how you prove a personal opinion right, we could do that for you: set up some think tanks, we do however need to know how Sikhism allows for the divinity of Christ and as yet your main aim has been to prove Sikhism to be illogical and deceiving yet we know the bible to be the biggest conspiracy of all.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Chow !!!</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Inderjit Singh Dhillon :crazy: </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ISDhillon, post: 21753, member: 1987"] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Jass Singh Ji :8-(: [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]So now your getting rude that’s ok I don’t mind, however a large portion of your new message is the same logic…reason…yadaa yadaaa yadaa, when I communicate I am not using logic I am using grammatical construction but only to convey that logic is incorrect and you have been unable to show how the sikh doctrine does breakdown because you know very well it involves a paradigm shift in thinking, say what you may but this doctrine is irrefutable and therefore the only true religious doctrine, plenty of people have rebutted the Christian doctrine by playing what you call “normal debating rules” but I cant even start to do that because I believe that the bible is man made and I need hard proof that it is not.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]You then go on to twist the highly esteemed scholar and most authoritative on Sikhism by saying that sikhsim does not claim to be the final word of god then call that laughable and guess what I will share in your laughter but only at your ignorance, you see we are not a totalitarian faith no one can fully sing the praises of god and all religions ARE EQUAL, you then profess your sophistication by claiming that transcendental phenomenon is a part of logic and reason but the dawn of post-modernism is enough to make you choke your words. Your last post was a great failure it’s a rehash of everything you have said in all your other posts and the reason why you continue to respond is not to correct me but because you know I have got you by the short and curlies and guess what I never had to do a course in critical thinking I just accept the infallibility of truth which is bani..[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Have some respect for the Sikh scholar who has portrayed the sovereignty of the Sikh doctrine don’t argue with it just convert, because tomorrow onwards I may become silent and refuse to engage in logical debate, but the doctrine still exists and works this is why a famous scholar called Cunningham said that “Sikhs are bound by an objective known only to them” our basic category is spirit and this you will have to obey and I am going to continue in this path because I know that I am not living in hope I have the truth with me when I practice my faith I have a subjective experience and when you have those experiences people like you are just momentary experiences but the inner experiences is forever. And how very convenient that you bring up the other scholar who if I remember correctly actually contradicted you by calling reason divine hukum and that reason in sggs was used for social reform do you really think she means reason in the sense of apologetics I think not you would get a severe beating if you were to try your tactics on any of those scholars they wont stand for your intellectual rubbish you’ll be done and dusted in next to no time.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]You then say you cant have truth without logic and fail to understand that sat is spirit which is ultimate reality therefore sach is something that is right the 2 are totally different, something that is right is not true its just right, because some people will say that having premarital sex is wrong but others may say its fine, truth has no hand in this, this is a sikh perspective not a Christian one. We are told certain rights and wrong in religion but that is not the true path but the most righteous one. You then second guess the mind of guru ji by saying the gurus would never have thrown out intellect even though the purpose of sikhsim is self-realisation which requires no intellect this is blasphemy of the guru and then you introduce words like fideism which I couldn’t care less about and no one is interested in Sikhism to find objective truth but to create a harmonious world of gurmukhs, something the church of hate could do with.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Then you state in you lengthy paragraph on self-realisation that we are in some way deceiving ourselves because “how do you know?” – answer: because the guru says so! And that is enough for us you my dear friend are actually a sleep, and devoid of religion also for that matter, religion is not about living in hope that is false merriment, religion is about becoming glory and that you aint.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Now I have tried my best to help you by showing you the true sikh path but instead you throw the baby out with the bathwater and bring in insults if you can prove the doctrine wrong then do it and make haste, all I have done is for your own rehabilitation you are living a life of unholy and you are free to do so because I believe in the sovereignity of man therefore you are entitled to your faith, but you have failed to enlighten me. I think what I am saying is that you must play by our own rules if you would like a sikh perspective otherwise the only option left is for you to visit a non-sikh forum because otherwise why would you be even on this forum asking us to provide you for a sikh perspective when you reject it out right, we don’t need to know how you prove a personal opinion right, we could do that for you: set up some think tanks, we do however need to know how Sikhism allows for the divinity of Christ and as yet your main aim has been to prove Sikhism to be illogical and deceiving yet we know the bible to be the biggest conspiracy of all.[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Chow !!![/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Inderjit Singh Dhillon :crazy: [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Many Christians Believe That Jesus Is God. What Does Sikhism Say About It?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top