☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Is Science A Religion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tejwant Singh" data-source="post: 185171" data-attributes="member: 138"><p>Harvir007 ji,</p><p></p><p>Guru Fateh.</p><p></p><p>First of all Science is just an observational tool which makes us find things in an objective manner, hence very fluid with every new technique that helps us discover or see the same thing in a different manner provided the scientists are objectively honest about it.</p><p></p><p>But,I am sorry to say that your investigation into science as Harvir Bond does not pan out with the facts and I know you love facts. There are scientists on all sides of the equation. Many have subjective agendas depending on who is paying them. Hence they make their own facts to justify the means. Pharma Industry is full of them. Lobbyists of certain agendas like 'No to Climate change', Tar sand oil and other fields are filled with these kinds of "snake oil scientists". And yes, many become their followers blindly.</p><p></p><p>The objective scientists can be found in some universities and in the Govt research departments like CDC and FDA in the US which help us untangle the mysteries of life to certain point.</p><p></p><p>However, let's not just talk about the scientists in white long coats holding test tubes or dead gerbils in their hands. There are also Economic Scientists.</p><p></p><p>The two eminent Harvard professors, economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff have created economic havoc in Europe with their austerity theory presented in 2010, a dangerously flawed one in which they claimed that 90 percent debt-to-GDP ratio means a collapse in growth. They gallantly claimed that even in times of recession, debt is more dangerous than high unemployment.</p><p></p><p>Their conclusions led to the austerity policies all over Europe, and "we know the rest of the story", as the late Steve Harvey, a radio commentator in the US would say.</p><p></p><p>They claim that without austerity, the economy of the industrialised countries would be negative .05%. This theory of theirs was debunked by a U Mass student named Thomas Herndon who used the same data of the two famous scientists with their permission and showed how flawed their data was. In fact, he noted that with the help of Government intervention by injecting money in the market rather than austerity, the economy would grow 2.2% and that in fact is happening in the US despite multiple roadblocks erected by the GOP because we have a Kenyan born, socialist, communist, Muslim President and if he fails, then America fails, which they do not care about because they are only patriotic to White America. If GOP cared about the US economy which would also help the economies in other parts of the world, then they would pass many bills for that purpose but they refuse to do so.</p><p></p><p>Their theory was embraced by the GOP party of the US and also by many conservative nations like the UK and others including the IMF and we know how the economies of Europe have tanked. I do not want to bore you with more of this nitty gritty.You can Google it yourself to get a better picture.</p><p></p><p>So does the above make you a rationale being as you yourself mentioned in your post above?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is science for you. But that is not the point I am trying to make rather I am struggling in understanding what your point in this thread is. </p><p></p><p>Can you please put it in lay man's terms?</p><p></p><p>Regards</p><p></p><p>Tejwant Singh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tejwant Singh, post: 185171, member: 138"] Harvir007 ji, Guru Fateh. First of all Science is just an observational tool which makes us find things in an objective manner, hence very fluid with every new technique that helps us discover or see the same thing in a different manner provided the scientists are objectively honest about it. But,I am sorry to say that your investigation into science as Harvir Bond does not pan out with the facts and I know you love facts. There are scientists on all sides of the equation. Many have subjective agendas depending on who is paying them. Hence they make their own facts to justify the means. Pharma Industry is full of them. Lobbyists of certain agendas like 'No to Climate change', Tar sand oil and other fields are filled with these kinds of "snake oil scientists". And yes, many become their followers blindly. The objective scientists can be found in some universities and in the Govt research departments like CDC and FDA in the US which help us untangle the mysteries of life to certain point. However, let's not just talk about the scientists in white long coats holding test tubes or dead gerbils in their hands. There are also Economic Scientists. The two eminent Harvard professors, economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff have created economic havoc in Europe with their austerity theory presented in 2010, a dangerously flawed one in which they claimed that 90 percent debt-to-GDP ratio means a collapse in growth. They gallantly claimed that even in times of recession, debt is more dangerous than high unemployment. Their conclusions led to the austerity policies all over Europe, and "we know the rest of the story", as the late Steve Harvey, a radio commentator in the US would say. They claim that without austerity, the economy of the industrialised countries would be negative .05%. This theory of theirs was debunked by a U Mass student named Thomas Herndon who used the same data of the two famous scientists with their permission and showed how flawed their data was. In fact, he noted that with the help of Government intervention by injecting money in the market rather than austerity, the economy would grow 2.2% and that in fact is happening in the US despite multiple roadblocks erected by the GOP because we have a Kenyan born, socialist, communist, Muslim President and if he fails, then America fails, which they do not care about because they are only patriotic to White America. If GOP cared about the US economy which would also help the economies in other parts of the world, then they would pass many bills for that purpose but they refuse to do so. Their theory was embraced by the GOP party of the US and also by many conservative nations like the UK and others including the IMF and we know how the economies of Europe have tanked. I do not want to bore you with more of this nitty gritty.You can Google it yourself to get a better picture. So does the above make you a rationale being as you yourself mentioned in your post above? [B][/B] This is science for you. But that is not the point I am trying to make rather I am struggling in understanding what your point in this thread is. Can you please put it in lay man's terms? Regards Tejwant Singh [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Is Science A Religion?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top