☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Questions & Answers
How To See God In All?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harry Haller" data-source="post: 211057" data-attributes="member: 14641"><p>You have yet to answer a single question I have asked of you, you post links to websites that laud a living Guru, you write as if you know all the answers, yet seem unable to back this up with any substance, I think I have been quite tactful and patient, as a moderator I have to ensure that any definitive writings are backed up with definitive proof, otherwise, its quite easy, stop writing definitively, try using the words, 'in my opinion', or 'it is my thinking', but you don't you keep posting huge tracts of definitive statements that you then attribute to the SGGS. I would be failing in my job if this was not pointed out, it is nothing personal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes it does, and how that is interpreted is up to the individual, having said that, flowery writing, ie, writing that on the face of it sounds good, but has no substance, achieves nothing, it is surface writing, purely for the ego, SGGS is not written in that fashion, it is written to prompt deep thinking, it is factual, it can be backed up, if you are not prepared to backup what you are writing, then don't write it, otherwise we will have a forum filled with everyone's personal opinion that no one feels the need to substantiate, there are other forums that operate like this, not this one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you for your opinion but I am not a scientist, I find the SGGS full of worldly logic, I am surprised you have written this. Are you saying the SGGS has no worldly logic?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have said many times God is learning, what other conclusion can one draw from such a statement? You see this is the problem with surface flowery writing, you forget that your words actually mean things if you follow them through, do you not wish me to take your writings seriously?</p><p>Should I just read them and bow down before your wisdom? If god is learning then he is not perfect, would you not say? Above you have said god discovers, again, if god is still discovering, then he is not perfect, perfection already knows, does not need to discover, please clarify this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How can I twist this statement that you made below</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong>discover verb</strong></span></p><p>UK /dɪˈskʌv.ər/ US /dɪˈskʌv.ɚ/</p><p><a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/help/codes.html" target="_blank">[ T ]</a> to <a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/find" target="_blank">find</a> <a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/information" target="_blank">information</a>, a <a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/place" target="_blank">place</a>, or an <a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/object" target="_blank">object</a>, <a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/especially" target="_blank">especially</a> for the first <a href="http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/time" target="_blank">time</a>:</p><p></p><p>If God is perfect then he knows all, discover is not a word that can be used for a perfect god.</p><p></p><p>Please clarify this, thank you.</p><p>[doublepost=1478064989,1478064675][/doublepost]</p><p></p><p>Flowery is a word I used, I would say it describes writing that is full of buzz words but has no substance or fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harry Haller, post: 211057, member: 14641"] You have yet to answer a single question I have asked of you, you post links to websites that laud a living Guru, you write as if you know all the answers, yet seem unable to back this up with any substance, I think I have been quite tactful and patient, as a moderator I have to ensure that any definitive writings are backed up with definitive proof, otherwise, its quite easy, stop writing definitively, try using the words, 'in my opinion', or 'it is my thinking', but you don't you keep posting huge tracts of definitive statements that you then attribute to the SGGS. I would be failing in my job if this was not pointed out, it is nothing personal. Yes it does, and how that is interpreted is up to the individual, having said that, flowery writing, ie, writing that on the face of it sounds good, but has no substance, achieves nothing, it is surface writing, purely for the ego, SGGS is not written in that fashion, it is written to prompt deep thinking, it is factual, it can be backed up, if you are not prepared to backup what you are writing, then don't write it, otherwise we will have a forum filled with everyone's personal opinion that no one feels the need to substantiate, there are other forums that operate like this, not this one. Thank you for your opinion but I am not a scientist, I find the SGGS full of worldly logic, I am surprised you have written this. Are you saying the SGGS has no worldly logic? You have said many times God is learning, what other conclusion can one draw from such a statement? You see this is the problem with surface flowery writing, you forget that your words actually mean things if you follow them through, do you not wish me to take your writings seriously? Should I just read them and bow down before your wisdom? If god is learning then he is not perfect, would you not say? Above you have said god discovers, again, if god is still discovering, then he is not perfect, perfection already knows, does not need to discover, please clarify this. How can I twist this statement that you made below [SIZE=4][B]discover verb[/B][/SIZE] UK /dɪˈskʌv.ər/ US /dɪˈskʌv.ɚ/ [URL='http://dictionary.cambridge.org/help/codes.html'][ T ][/URL] to [URL='http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/find']find[/URL] [URL='http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/information']information[/URL], a [URL='http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/place']place[/URL], or an [URL='http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/object']object[/URL], [URL='http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/especially']especially[/URL] for the first [URL='http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/time']time[/URL]: If God is perfect then he knows all, discover is not a word that can be used for a perfect god. Please clarify this, thank you. [doublepost=1478064989,1478064675][/doublepost] Flowery is a word I used, I would say it describes writing that is full of buzz words but has no substance or fact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Questions & Answers
How To See God In All?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top