☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Financial Incentive To Improve Punjab Sex Ratio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sinister" data-source="post: 64051" data-attributes="member: 2684"><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Hello clarkjoey,</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="color: dimgray">Well your post was more a less a hit-job on atheism than anything else of value to the debate. I have read my fair share of extraterrestrial assertions but your post tops my list. Let me address it nonetheless (because ignorance should not no go unpunished):</span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">First off that’s not an opinion it’s a cognitive/analytical prejudiced assertion.</span></span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Really Europe has become non-socially thinking? Id like some proof of that. </span></span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">No such thing as an “individual-thinking individual”. We are a social species that fundamentally believe in cooperation and group formation with an inclusive/exclusive collective consciousness. The Malthusian view of war of each against all is rather erroneous and an outdated social theory (I think you know that as well), even amongst animals this behaviour is not seen. Even animals show clear signs of group formation and cooperation. The behaviour of reciprocity is innate and the reciprocity theory holds ground today in science and social theory.</span></span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">And if European society had become “non-socially thinking communities” they would have long collapsed. No one would pay taxes, follow the laws or enforce the laws. Which is not case.</span></span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Do you seriously believe everything you just wrote above? ..lol if you do then you are in desperate need of a re-education and re-examination of your “opinions” (and that’s my opinion). I am an agnostic and my thought process lies absolutely nowhere along these lines.</span></span></span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Question:</span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Why are the most atheist and secular communities the most conscious of environmental standards? Why do they work the hardest in preserving and limiting ecological footprint?</span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Scandinavia </span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Denmark </span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Germany</span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Switzerland</span></span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Japan</span></span></span></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Again all I see is flawed logic. If atheism is truly individualistic as you claim it to be these countries would not be signing environmental accords because the citizenry would not care of the “commons”. The fact is these countries are the most aware and are taking the greatest steps to reduce harmful pollutants. This is living proof that secular humanism is more in tune with the environment than first meets the eye.</span></span></span></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">“<span style="color: red">Rampant societal atheism</span>” <span style="color: slategray"><span style="color: dimgray">lol you make it sound like a disease. When the fact is, it’s the agent for cure…. by bringing balance and equilibrium to our system</span>.</span> </span></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">“<span style="color: red">institutionalized secular humanism</span>” : I’d love to hear an example of such an institution because under your previous definition you said atheism is synonymous to individual against individual. Now a few sentences away you lay claim to the existence of “institutionalized secular humanism”. </span></span></span></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">How can atheists make an institution if they are, in your own words, “<span style="color: red">individual thinking individuals</span>”? </span></span></span></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Again you possess flawed logic, which according to my “<span style="color: red">opinion</span>” must be rectified.</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Tahoma'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="color: #5b5b5b"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">“<span style="color: red">No definitive moral right</span>”… so an atheist is devoid of all morality? Rather interesting and polar assertions you have…and if you don’t mind me asking….which school of thought does your hate filled opinion stem from?</span></span></span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Hypothetically If it were backlash what societal force would it be “backlashing” against and why? </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sinister, post: 64051, member: 2684"] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3]Hello clarkjoey,[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=dimgray]Well your post was more a less a hit-job on atheism than anything else of value to the debate. I have read my fair share of extraterrestrial assertions but your post tops my list. Let me address it nonetheless (because ignorance should not no go unpunished):[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]First off that’s not an opinion it’s a cognitive/analytical prejudiced assertion.[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Really Europe has become non-socially thinking? Id like some proof of that. [/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]No such thing as an “individual-thinking individual”. We are a social species that fundamentally believe in cooperation and group formation with an inclusive/exclusive collective consciousness. The Malthusian view of war of each against all is rather erroneous and an outdated social theory (I think you know that as well), even amongst animals this behaviour is not seen. Even animals show clear signs of group formation and cooperation. The behaviour of reciprocity is innate and the reciprocity theory holds ground today in science and social theory.[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]And if European society had become “non-socially thinking communities” they would have long collapsed. No one would pay taxes, follow the laws or enforce the laws. Which is not case.[/SIZE][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Do you seriously believe everything you just wrote above? ..lol if you do then you are in desperate need of a re-education and re-examination of your “opinions” (and that’s my opinion). I am an agnostic and my thought process lies absolutely nowhere along these lines.[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Tahoma][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Question:[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Why are the most atheist and secular communities the most conscious of environmental standards? Why do they work the hardest in preserving and limiting ecological footprint?[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Scandinavia [/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Denmark [/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Germany[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Switzerland[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Japan[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Again all I see is flawed logic. If atheism is truly individualistic as you claim it to be these countries would not be signing environmental accords because the citizenry would not care of the “commons”. The fact is these countries are the most aware and are taking the greatest steps to reduce harmful pollutants. This is living proof that secular humanism is more in tune with the environment than first meets the eye.[/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]“[COLOR=red]Rampant societal atheism[/COLOR]” [COLOR=slategray][COLOR=dimgray]lol you make it sound like a disease. When the fact is, it’s the agent for cure…. by bringing balance and equilibrium to our system[/COLOR].[/COLOR] [/SIZE][/FONT] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]“[COLOR=red]institutionalized secular humanism[/COLOR]” : I’d love to hear an example of such an institution because under your previous definition you said atheism is synonymous to individual against individual. Now a few sentences away you lay claim to the existence of “institutionalized secular humanism”. [/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]How can atheists make an institution if they are, in your own words, “[COLOR=red]individual thinking individuals[/COLOR]”? [/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Times New Roman]Again you possess flawed logic, which according to my “[COLOR=red]opinion[/COLOR]” must be rectified.[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][FONT=Verdana][COLOR=#5b5b5b][FONT=Times New Roman]“[COLOR=red]No definitive moral right[/COLOR]”… so an atheist is devoid of all morality? Rather interesting and polar assertions you have…and if you don’t mind me asking….which school of thought does your hate filled opinion stem from?[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT] [FONT=Tahoma][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Hypothetically If it were backlash what societal force would it be “backlashing” against and why? [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Financial Incentive To Improve Punjab Sex Ratio
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top