☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
Bachittar Natak
Explain This In Dasam Granth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vijaydeep Singh" data-source="post: 48495" data-attributes="member: 313"><p>Gurfateh</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Dear Brother,</p><p> </p><p>If we lack faith in God we have fear and due to fear we do good lots of lies.</p><p> </p><p>Say if Adolf Hitler did years of reseach on fake things then it may not mean that Years were truly utilised.We have Dr Jakir Nayak who does research a lies so that is not eh point.</p><p> </p><p>Well coming to Gyan Gurdit Singh Ji,</p><p> </p><p>Reason for Tankha for him is this lie.He has never seen the manuscripts of Guru Granth Sahib Ji at Patna Sahib.We both can revisit Patna Sahib and reconfirm it.As he says there is not manuscript in Patna Sahib without Raagmala.So it is up to you to still belive in lies.</p><p> </p><p>There is thread over Mundvini here also.As you talk of Bhai Kahan Singh Ji Nabha.He said that at Kartarpuri Berrh(primary version) there are interpoltated verses like Jit Dar Lakh Mohamada etc. and Raagmala is there.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>But Bhai Jodh Singh himslef carried research on intance of Panthic boides and found that Bhai Kahan Singh Nabha also lied as there is no such verse like Jit Dar Lakh mohamada etc. in </p><p>Kartarpuri Beerh.In the same copy only after 1 and half page from Mundavini Raagmala is wrritan and before that also there are mnay pages which had blank pages.Raagmala in same and ink and hand writing is found on perhaps 975 Page(das could be mistaken).</p><p> </p><p>Das was told that Bhai Sahib Kahan Singh Ji were shown another version by Sodi Family.while they say that they have oonly one version of the copy.There seems to be no motive either for Sodis to show wrong thing.</p><p> </p><p>And in fact withiin this Beerh on some empty page some one has wrritan a formula of alchemy but in differnt writing and ink.Had sodis fabricated something then they would not have shown this alchemy formula also.</p><p> </p><p>And thing does not ends here.As per Dr Sengar(Hindi Litrature Historian) Alam was at the time of Bahadur Shah(contmeporary of Guru Gobind Singh Ji).So how could Alam went in past to write Raagmala as it is also found in Bhai Bannu Beerh(can be seen at Kanpur Gurudwara Bhai Bannu).</p><p> </p><p>And the oldest version of Madhav Nal Kam Kandala from wherre people claim that Raagmal is taken can be seen at Kankroli in UP and it is called Kankroli Manuscript.There are 20% differance and if we say we do tranlitration from Nagri to Gurmukhi differance can go upto 80% but wants to neutral over here that as writan in Gurumukhi same sounds may have diffenr Chaercter to depict.So das still say 80% similar.Yet Its time is about that of Guru Gobind Singh Ji.Last winter das spent a great lot of time to research and das put that thing over here on this site also with scaaned file and tranlitration from Nagri to Roman.</p><p> </p><p>Still if you say Gyani Gurdit Singh ji are OK then das has no objection.Das say as a Sikh that Akal can get anyone salvage and that one also who does not read Raagmala.Anyway another school of people say that there was another Alam who was Sufi, and he was at the time of Akbar.Yet there is no prrof of that then single description of Akabar's time in Madhav Nal Kamkandala.There are mnay more works on same stroy and there is perhaps Triya Charitar 91 which has stroy of Madhavnal Kamkandala.</p><p> </p><p>Reson for single Alam describing the time of Akbar could be more due to his being poet and Akbar period was golden era and his time we had Aurangzeb who made hell for litrary people.</p><p> </p><p>Das wants to say that Das started from the fact that Raagmala is from Alam the First and when moved backword found this not true.</p><p> </p><p>If say youself have not visited Thamu Ji Sahib Kartarpur and not seen the Beerh which they show on Vaishakhi,Yuo may use other sourses to say aboput that.They can be wrong.So do ti yourself.Now as you say Gyani Gurdit Singh ji worked,it is not your first Hand info.Das request you to collect primary data then relying upon secondary data which could be biased.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vijaydeep Singh, post: 48495, member: 313"] Gurfateh Dear Brother, If we lack faith in God we have fear and due to fear we do good lots of lies. Say if Adolf Hitler did years of reseach on fake things then it may not mean that Years were truly utilised.We have Dr Jakir Nayak who does research a lies so that is not eh point. Well coming to Gyan Gurdit Singh Ji, Reason for Tankha for him is this lie.He has never seen the manuscripts of Guru Granth Sahib Ji at Patna Sahib.We both can revisit Patna Sahib and reconfirm it.As he says there is not manuscript in Patna Sahib without Raagmala.So it is up to you to still belive in lies. There is thread over Mundvini here also.As you talk of Bhai Kahan Singh Ji Nabha.He said that at Kartarpuri Berrh(primary version) there are interpoltated verses like Jit Dar Lakh Mohamada etc. and Raagmala is there. But Bhai Jodh Singh himslef carried research on intance of Panthic boides and found that Bhai Kahan Singh Nabha also lied as there is no such verse like Jit Dar Lakh mohamada etc. in Kartarpuri Beerh.In the same copy only after 1 and half page from Mundavini Raagmala is wrritan and before that also there are mnay pages which had blank pages.Raagmala in same and ink and hand writing is found on perhaps 975 Page(das could be mistaken). Das was told that Bhai Sahib Kahan Singh Ji were shown another version by Sodi Family.while they say that they have oonly one version of the copy.There seems to be no motive either for Sodis to show wrong thing. And in fact withiin this Beerh on some empty page some one has wrritan a formula of alchemy but in differnt writing and ink.Had sodis fabricated something then they would not have shown this alchemy formula also. And thing does not ends here.As per Dr Sengar(Hindi Litrature Historian) Alam was at the time of Bahadur Shah(contmeporary of Guru Gobind Singh Ji).So how could Alam went in past to write Raagmala as it is also found in Bhai Bannu Beerh(can be seen at Kanpur Gurudwara Bhai Bannu). And the oldest version of Madhav Nal Kam Kandala from wherre people claim that Raagmal is taken can be seen at Kankroli in UP and it is called Kankroli Manuscript.There are 20% differance and if we say we do tranlitration from Nagri to Gurmukhi differance can go upto 80% but wants to neutral over here that as writan in Gurumukhi same sounds may have diffenr Chaercter to depict.So das still say 80% similar.Yet Its time is about that of Guru Gobind Singh Ji.Last winter das spent a great lot of time to research and das put that thing over here on this site also with scaaned file and tranlitration from Nagri to Roman. Still if you say Gyani Gurdit Singh ji are OK then das has no objection.Das say as a Sikh that Akal can get anyone salvage and that one also who does not read Raagmala.Anyway another school of people say that there was another Alam who was Sufi, and he was at the time of Akbar.Yet there is no prrof of that then single description of Akabar's time in Madhav Nal Kamkandala.There are mnay more works on same stroy and there is perhaps Triya Charitar 91 which has stroy of Madhavnal Kamkandala. Reson for single Alam describing the time of Akbar could be more due to his being poet and Akbar period was golden era and his time we had Aurangzeb who made hell for litrary people. Das wants to say that Das started from the fact that Raagmala is from Alam the First and when moved backword found this not true. If say youself have not visited Thamu Ji Sahib Kartarpur and not seen the Beerh which they show on Vaishakhi,Yuo may use other sourses to say aboput that.They can be wrong.So do ti yourself.Now as you say Gyani Gurdit Singh ji worked,it is not your first Hand info.Das request you to collect primary data then relying upon secondary data which could be biased. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
Bachittar Natak
Explain This In Dasam Granth
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top