☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Evolution & Sikhism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="P_Sikh" data-source="post: 53829" data-attributes="member: 4765"><p><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Conclusion:</span></span></strong><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></span></strong><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Evolution occurred by chance. Humans came from single-celled organisms possibly even PNA or TNA molecules. Where did the p-RNA, TNA and PNA come from? …WHO KNOWS, WHO CARES?</span></span></strong><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: red"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Well, this is the DUMBEST answer you could expect from any BY CHANCE/ACCIDENT EVOLUTISTNISTS (Now I’m not saying you are dumb)</span></span></strong></p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Your conclusion (And every conclusion of any theory) leads us to SINGLE SOURCE = CREATOR = GOD and yet saying WHO KNOWS, WHO CARES? Well, MILLIONS OF people do care who believe in GOD. By Chance/Accident Evolutionists do want us to believe them 100% and gave up the ‘GOD EXISTS’ and still DON ‘T CARE about answering all the questions. WELL THAT IS DUMB.</span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">And the scientists have predicted the previous death(s) of the universe and predict the death of this universe as well. ‘BY CHANCE’ can’t happen again and again. THEY SEEM TO BE SAYING THIS HAPPENED ‘BY CHANCE’ AND PREDICTING ANOTHER ‘BY CHANCE’ TO HAPPEN.</span></strong></li> </ul><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">What you saying is Chronological Snobbery,</span></span></strong><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"> The fallacy which occurs when a point is refuted or proven by simply dating the evidence as very old thus making it impossible to be verified or be proven.</span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Nobel laureate James Watson stated, “In contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid” (The Double Helix, p. 14).</span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: #3366ff">Once evolution is allowed the assumption of an orderly universe favorable for life, they “do a little better” in explaining how life might have evolved. However, the origin of such a universe can never be assumed—it simply could not have occurred without detailed, creative forethought</span></strong><strong><span style="color: #00ccff">.</span></strong></span></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: #33cccc"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">A few decades ago, Harlow Shapley, a noted astronomer, made an interesting admission that still defines the predicament that evolutionists have always faced: “We appear, therefore, to be rather helpless with regard to explaining the origin of the universe. But once it is set going, we can do a little better at interpretation” (The Evolution of Life, Vol. 1).</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><u><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica-Condensed-Black'"><strong>The Trilobite’s Eye: Evolution Reversed?</strong></span></span></u></span></p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The crux of the theory of evolution is that all living animals have evolved from simpler creatures. It all started as a puddle of living matter, which evolved into more complex and diverse creatures, and then animals. This whole concept is based on the assumption that, over time, all organisms improve by natural selection—survival of the fittest. While that concept is riddled with holes, let’s assume it true for a moment. </span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">You would expect to find that the fossil record shows that, as time passed, creatures grew more and more complicated. This would be especially true in vision systems. Because vision, in even the simplest of creatures, is very complex, you would expect it to take millions of years for any “advanced” vision system to appear.</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Anything complex that appeared too quickly, or appeared without any prior organism being its precursor, would be an embarrassment to proponents of evolution.</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">So introduces the trilobite. These extinct invertebrates existed in vast numbers throughout the world’s oceans, and date back to the Cambrian period—approximately 400-500 million years ago. What is most amazing about these creatures is that they had remarkably complex vision systems. So complex were their eyes, that no invertebrates—or even many vertebrates—possess anything comparable today! Also, these creatures seem to have appeared suddenly, with no fossil record of anything of the like before</span></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">them.</span></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"> </span></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Professor Richard Fortey, a researcher at the Natural History Museum in London states, “We know that the first trilobites already had a well-developed visual system. Indeed, the large eyes found in the genus Fallotaspis, from Morocco, prove that sophisticated vision goes back at least 540 million years to the Cambrian period.” Of the Phacops trilobite genus, he went on to state, “Clearly a very sophisticated structure (even more so than the [usual] hexagonal-lensed trilobite eye), Phacops’s crystal eye is a sports coupe in the age of the boneshaker” (“Crystal Eyes,” Natural History 109, no. 8, pp. 70-71).</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: fuchsia"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">With such statements from a world-renowned paleobiologist, it is quite obvious that another leg “supporting” the theory of By Chance evolution is nothing more than smoke and mirrors.</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: #00ccff"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Albert Einstein—made this keen observation about the order, laws and forethought that God put into His creation. Einstein expressed the following (condensed and paraphrased here): He was fully confident of the existence of a superior intelligence that he perceived to be at work in the universe. He expressed belief in a God who revealed Himself in the orderly harmony of what existed. His perception of religion</span></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #00ccff"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">as a scientist took on a “rapturous amazement” at the harmony of natural laws, which revealed an intelligence of such superiority that all the collective systematic thinking of human beings was an utterly insignificant reflection (Out of My Later Years).</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><u><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The Universe</span></span></u></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">EVOLUTIONISTS’ assumptions of a creation without a Creator should not go unchallenged. Mathematical probabilities alone disprove the mere existence of matter coming about by random chance. Even the existence of a universe containing biological life prohibits any possibility of countless intricate balances occurring by chance. Yet, evolution ignores the overwhelming probabilities prohibiting the existence of this creation by random chance.</span></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The seven of the numerous, very specific conditions required in order for matter to exist in a form that is favourable to sustain life are (I’m not going to get into detail of each of these but again if you are not sure of any of these, ask for explanantion)</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Neutron Mass ~ Proton Mass</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Proton Charge = Electron Charge</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Strong Nuclear Force</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Epsilon Constant ~ Gravitational Fine Structure</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Primordial Escape Velocity = Primordial Expansion Velocity</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The Cosmological Constant ~ 0</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Weak Nuclear Force</span></span></strong></li> </ul><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Now what are the probabilities? A Software program, Universal Analyser, helped in calculating the mathematical probability of an undersigned universe meeting the 7 requirements for the existence of life.</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">This software demonstrated how remote the probabilities were for all of these requirements to be met purely by random chance. One demonstration featured a total of 2,129 separate universe models. These models give a realistic picture of what the chances would be, given various requirements being met by random chance. Below is the list as to how many requirements were met.</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Models meeting 1 of the 7 requirements—404</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Models meeting 2 of the 7 requirements—8</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Models meeting 3 of the 7 requirements—0</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Models meeting 4 of the 7 requirements—0</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Models meeting 5 of the 7 requirements—0</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Models meeting 6 of the 7 requirements—0 </span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Models meeting 7 of the 7 requirements—0</span></span></strong></li> </ul><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Notice that of the 2,129 separate universe models, only 404 met at least one requirement by random chance. (The only requirements for which the random number generation program were able to qualify were requirements 1, 3, 4 and</span></span></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">7.) </span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Of the 2,129 models, only eight met two of the necessary requirements. Not a single model was able to meet three or more. The program user could alter the parameters to differ from the forces and constants found in the universe and score a higher probability than the demonstration covered. The point is this: Given the constants, forces and other parameters in the known universe, the probability of these seven requirements being met by chance would be nil for millions upon millions of separate models conducted continually across time!</span></span></span></strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: #993366"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">FEW OTHER FACTORS, IF WASN’T AT THE PRICISE PLACE/CONDITION, THE LIFE WOULD NOT BE HERE</span></span></span></strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">PRECISE Orbits of the earth and moon</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The PRECISE TILT of the earth</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">Issues of PRECISE temperatures, pressure and composition of the atmosphere</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">PRECISE filteration of radiation</span></span></strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">The continuous water cycle</span></span></strong></li> </ul><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><strong><span style="color: #993366">STILL EVERYTHING HAPPENED BY CHANCE, AGAIN AND AGAIN AND YET AGAIN. MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF CHANCES HAPPENED FOR THE LIFE TO REACH HERE WITHOUT ANY INTERVENTION, </span></strong><strong><span style="color: red">WELL DONE BY CHANCE EVOLUTIONISTS.</span></strong></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="P_Sikh, post: 53829, member: 4765"] [B][COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana]Conclusion:[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana]Evolution occurred by chance. Humans came from single-celled organisms possibly even PNA or TNA molecules. Where did the p-RNA, TNA and PNA come from? …WHO KNOWS, WHO CARES?[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Verdana][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Verdana]Well, this is the DUMBEST answer you could expect from any BY CHANCE/ACCIDENT EVOLUTISTNISTS (Now I’m not saying you are dumb)[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Verdana] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [LIST] [*][B][FONT=Verdana]Your conclusion (And every conclusion of any theory) leads us to SINGLE SOURCE = CREATOR = GOD and yet saying WHO KNOWS, WHO CARES? Well, MILLIONS OF people do care who believe in GOD. By Chance/Accident Evolutionists do want us to believe them 100% and gave up the ‘GOD EXISTS’ and still DON ‘T CARE about answering all the questions. WELL THAT IS DUMB.[/FONT][/B] [*][B][FONT=Verdana]And the scientists have predicted the previous death(s) of the universe and predict the death of this universe as well. ‘BY CHANCE’ can’t happen again and again. THEY SEEM TO BE SAYING THIS HAPPENED ‘BY CHANCE’ AND PREDICTING ANOTHER ‘BY CHANCE’ TO HAPPEN.[/FONT][/B][/LIST][B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Verdana] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Verdana]What you saying is Chronological Snobbery,[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Verdana] The fallacy which occurs when a point is refuted or proven by simply dating the evidence as very old thus making it impossible to be verified or be proven.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Verdana] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Verdana]Nobel laureate James Watson stated, “In contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid” (The Double Helix, p. 14).[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Verdana] [/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=#3366ff]Once evolution is allowed the assumption of an orderly universe favorable for life, they “do a little better” in explaining how life might have evolved. However, the origin of such a universe can never be assumed—it simply could not have occurred without detailed, creative forethought[/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=#00ccff].[/COLOR][/B][/FONT][/SIZE] [B][COLOR=#00ccff][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#33cccc][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]A few decades ago, Harlow Shapley, a noted astronomer, made an interesting admission that still defines the predicament that evolutionists have always faced: “We appear, therefore, to be rather helpless with regard to explaining the origin of the universe. But once it is set going, we can do a little better at interpretation” (The Evolution of Life, Vol. 1).[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#00ccff][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [FONT=Times New Roman][U][COLOR=fuchsia][FONT=Helvetica-Condensed-Black][B]The Trilobite’s Eye: Evolution Reversed?[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][/U][U][COLOR=fuchsia][FONT=Helvetica-Condensed-Black][/FONT][/COLOR][/U][/FONT] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]The crux of the theory of evolution is that all living animals have evolved from simpler creatures. It all started as a puddle of living matter, which evolved into more complex and diverse creatures, and then animals. This whole concept is based on the assumption that, over time, all organisms improve by natural selection—survival of the fittest. While that concept is riddled with holes, let’s assume it true for a moment. [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]You would expect to find that the fossil record shows that, as time passed, creatures grew more and more complicated. This would be especially true in vision systems. Because vision, in even the simplest of creatures, is very complex, you would expect it to take millions of years for any “advanced” vision system to appear.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Anything complex that appeared too quickly, or appeared without any prior organism being its precursor, would be an embarrassment to proponents of evolution.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]So introduces the trilobite. These extinct invertebrates existed in vast numbers throughout the world’s oceans, and date back to the Cambrian period—approximately 400-500 million years ago. What is most amazing about these creatures is that they had remarkably complex vision systems. So complex were their eyes, that no invertebrates—or even many vertebrates—possess anything comparable today! Also, these creatures seem to have appeared suddenly, with no fossil record of anything of the like before[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]them.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Professor Richard Fortey, a researcher at the Natural History Museum in London states, “We know that the first trilobites already had a well-developed visual system. Indeed, the large eyes found in the genus Fallotaspis, from Morocco, prove that sophisticated vision goes back at least 540 million years to the Cambrian period.” Of the Phacops trilobite genus, he went on to state, “Clearly a very sophisticated structure (even more so than the [usual] hexagonal-lensed trilobite eye), Phacops’s crystal eye is a sports coupe in the age of the boneshaker” (“Crystal Eyes,” Natural History 109, no. 8, pp. 70-71).[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]With such statements from a world-renowned paleobiologist, it is quite obvious that another leg “supporting” the theory of By Chance evolution is nothing more than smoke and mirrors.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=fuchsia][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#00ccff][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Albert Einstein—made this keen observation about the order, laws and forethought that God put into His creation. Einstein expressed the following (condensed and paraphrased here): He was fully confident of the existence of a superior intelligence that he perceived to be at work in the universe. He expressed belief in a God who revealed Himself in the orderly harmony of what existed. His perception of religion[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#00ccff][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]as a scientist took on a “rapturous amazement” at the harmony of natural laws, which revealed an intelligence of such superiority that all the collective systematic thinking of human beings was an utterly insignificant reflection (Out of My Later Years).[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#00ccff][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][U][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman]The Universe[/FONT][/COLOR][/U][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]EVOLUTIONISTS’ assumptions of a creation without a Creator should not go unchallenged. Mathematical probabilities alone disprove the mere existence of matter coming about by random chance. Even the existence of a universe containing biological life prohibits any possibility of countless intricate balances occurring by chance. Yet, evolution ignores the overwhelming probabilities prohibiting the existence of this creation by random chance.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]The seven of the numerous, very specific conditions required in order for matter to exist in a form that is favourable to sustain life are (I’m not going to get into detail of each of these but again if you are not sure of any of these, ask for explanantion)[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [LIST] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Neutron Mass ~ Proton Mass[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Proton Charge = Electron Charge[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Strong Nuclear Force[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Epsilon Constant ~ Gravitational Fine Structure[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Primordial Escape Velocity = Primordial Expansion Velocity[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]The Cosmological Constant ~ 0[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Weak Nuclear Force[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/LIST][B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Now what are the probabilities? A Software program, Universal Analyser, helped in calculating the mathematical probability of an undersigned universe meeting the 7 requirements for the existence of life.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]This software demonstrated how remote the probabilities were for all of these requirements to be met purely by random chance. One demonstration featured a total of 2,129 separate universe models. These models give a realistic picture of what the chances would be, given various requirements being met by random chance. Below is the list as to how many requirements were met.[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [LIST] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Models meeting 1 of the 7 requirements—404[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Models meeting 2 of the 7 requirements—8[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Models meeting 3 of the 7 requirements—0[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Models meeting 4 of the 7 requirements—0[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Models meeting 5 of the 7 requirements—0[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Models meeting 6 of the 7 requirements—0 [/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Models meeting 7 of the 7 requirements—0[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/LIST][B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Notice that of the 2,129 separate universe models, only 404 met at least one requirement by random chance. (The only requirements for which the random number generation program were able to qualify were requirements 1, 3, 4 and[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]7.) [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Of the 2,129 models, only eight met two of the necessary requirements. Not a single model was able to meet three or more. The program user could alter the parameters to differ from the forces and constants found in the universe and score a higher probability than the demonstration covered. The point is this: Given the constants, forces and other parameters in the known universe, the probability of these seven requirements being met by chance would be nil for millions upon millions of separate models conducted continually across time![/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [B][COLOR=#993366][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]FEW OTHER FACTORS, IF WASN’T AT THE PRICISE PLACE/CONDITION, THE LIFE WOULD NOT BE HERE[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [LIST] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]PRECISE Orbits of the earth and moon[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]The PRECISE TILT of the earth[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]Issues of PRECISE temperatures, pressure and composition of the atmosphere[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]PRECISE filteration of radiation[/FONT][/SIZE][/B] [*][B][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]The continuous water cycle[/FONT][/SIZE][/B][/LIST][B][COLOR=#993366][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman][B][COLOR=#993366]STILL EVERYTHING HAPPENED BY CHANCE, AGAIN AND AGAIN AND YET AGAIN. MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF CHANCES HAPPENED FOR THE LIFE TO REACH HERE WITHOUT ANY INTERVENTION, [/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=red]WELL DONE BY CHANCE EVOLUTIONISTS.[/COLOR][/B][/FONT][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Evolution & Sikhism
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top