☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
Does Waheguru Intervene?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harkiran Kaur" data-source="post: 204533" data-attributes="member: 18224"><p>Also my understanding of the relationship of observer to universe comes from Quantum Physics, and an insaitable appetite for the weird things in science, but when I read Gurbani I can easily see how it is referring to the same principles!</p><p> </p><p>This article might give a better understanding than I can explain (<a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2002/jun/featuniverse" target="_blank">http://discovermagazine.com/2002/jun/featuniverse</a>)... I am not a science writer, so it`s difficult to explain the implications of the double slit experiment, and even more, the results of a more comprehensive experiment that suggests we also shapwhat happened in the pastby obseation! I always had this feeling that we create as we observe. It actually crossed my mind long before I was into quantum physics that `what if`when we had primitive measuring devices, and could only see limited stars and no galaxies as of yet, that those galaxies didn`t actually exist until we looked a`observed them? Kind of like again yes a dream... when Itravel down a road in my dream, is what`s at the other end of the road already created or do I create it as I g while I am dreaming it? I always kind of put that thinking to the Univserse as well so when quantum physics seems to agree with it, its a bit awe inducing! What the experiments showed were that photons received from a distant quasar, when measured showed the same behaviour... collapse of the wave function... as the double slit experiment. The thing is, these photons from the quasar would have had to `decide`to pass through one lens or the other (galaxies in between which acted as lenses focusing them) which were many many light years away! This means the photons had to decide LONG before we set up the experiment, in some cases long before humans would have been on earth! And without observation, every time they behaved as waves... this is significant! It means that our conscious observation caused something to occur thousands of years in the past... that is, whther the photons acted as waves or particles!! So the big question is did the quasar even exist at all until we observed it?? The suggestion and implication of the experiment is no it did not! And this is from prominent physicists!</p><p> </p><p>In fact the idea is that the whole universe is existing as merely this big pool of infinite probabilities, until it`s observed into existence by a conscious observer. Yes this even implies that when you look away from something, it collapses into its wave function! Creepy and weird! So then, if observation is required for reality to even exist, then who is doing the observing?? Remember that the physical brain is part of this! WHO is observing your brain into being, so that your emergent property consciousness can exist at all?? This to me is strong evidence against the emergent property theory!!</p><p> </p><p>Ishna Ji, if ALL is being observed into existence by ONE observer, then ALL is being continually influenced by that observer!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harkiran Kaur, post: 204533, member: 18224"] Also my understanding of the relationship of observer to universe comes from Quantum Physics, and an insaitable appetite for the weird things in science, but when I read Gurbani I can easily see how it is referring to the same principles! This article might give a better understanding than I can explain ([URL]http://discovermagazine.com/2002/jun/featuniverse[/URL])... I am not a science writer, so it`s difficult to explain the implications of the double slit experiment, and even more, the results of a more comprehensive experiment that suggests we also shapwhat happened in the pastby obseation! I always had this feeling that we create as we observe. It actually crossed my mind long before I was into quantum physics that `what if`when we had primitive measuring devices, and could only see limited stars and no galaxies as of yet, that those galaxies didn`t actually exist until we looked a`observed them? Kind of like again yes a dream... when Itravel down a road in my dream, is what`s at the other end of the road already created or do I create it as I g while I am dreaming it? I always kind of put that thinking to the Univserse as well so when quantum physics seems to agree with it, its a bit awe inducing! What the experiments showed were that photons received from a distant quasar, when measured showed the same behaviour... collapse of the wave function... as the double slit experiment. The thing is, these photons from the quasar would have had to `decide`to pass through one lens or the other (galaxies in between which acted as lenses focusing them) which were many many light years away! This means the photons had to decide LONG before we set up the experiment, in some cases long before humans would have been on earth! And without observation, every time they behaved as waves... this is significant! It means that our conscious observation caused something to occur thousands of years in the past... that is, whther the photons acted as waves or particles!! So the big question is did the quasar even exist at all until we observed it?? The suggestion and implication of the experiment is no it did not! And this is from prominent physicists! In fact the idea is that the whole universe is existing as merely this big pool of infinite probabilities, until it`s observed into existence by a conscious observer. Yes this even implies that when you look away from something, it collapses into its wave function! Creepy and weird! So then, if observation is required for reality to even exist, then who is doing the observing?? Remember that the physical brain is part of this! WHO is observing your brain into being, so that your emergent property consciousness can exist at all?? This to me is strong evidence against the emergent property theory!! Ishna Ji, if ALL is being observed into existence by ONE observer, then ALL is being continually influenced by that observer! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Sikh Sikhi Sikhism
Does Waheguru Intervene?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top