☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Do Christians And Muslims Worship The Same God?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Archived_member15" data-source="post: 161193" data-attributes="member: 17438"><p>My dear brother Auzer kaurhug</p><p> </p><p><strong><em>As-Salaam-Alaikum!</em></strong> </p><p> </p><p>Friend, would you mind if I offered my perspective on the above? This is a Sikh forum and I have come here to learn more about Sikhism and to grow in love with my Sikh brothers and sisters. As a result I would rather not discuss my own religion all that much however since this is the interfaith section and its about Muslims and Christians, I would very much appreciate it if you would allow me to comment on your above words. </p><p> </p><p>On the one hand I am happy that you have taken the time to read the Bible which some of our Islamic brothers and sisters do not read, since they regard it as a corrupted text. I greatly appreciate and admire such open-mindedness from your good self. </p><p> </p><p>I also agree with you that the Qur'an courageously speaks out against the prevalent Arabian practice of infanticide of female babies. I actually know the Sura, which is a Meccan one called the Bee (I read it many years ago when I first studied the Qur'an in depth): </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><em>"When news is brought to one of them of the birth of a female child, his face darkens and he is filled with inward grief. With shame does he hide himself from his people because of the bad news he has had! Shall he retain her on contempt or bury her in the dust? Ah! what an evil they decide on?"</em><strong> (Quran 16:59).</strong> </span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>This was certainly an Islamic improvement upon the previous state of affairs in pagan Arabia. </p><p> </p><p>In all honesty, however, I do see errors with your representation of the Bible which I think borders slightly on the disrespectful side (I don't think there was any need to insult my religion - Christianity - in retaliation to someone criticizing Islam). </p><p> </p><p>I find it very sad that you felt the need to resort to criticizing my religion in response to criticism of Islam <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> </p><p> </p><p>You write: </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I hope you don't mind me asking but could you provide us with references for the above statements my dear friend? I think it would be beneficial to this discussion. </p><p> </p><p>The Bible teaches the equality of the sexes. This equality is reflected in the Galatian baptismal formula: </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>This text was most probably an early hymn or prayer that every newly baptized Christian sang or prayed with great rejoicing.</p><p> </p><p>Certainly the Bible upholds woman's right to education - and most enfatically. Jesus courageously broke the social mores of his time by teaching women on many occassions (the Judaism of the time relegated women largely to the home. This wasn't the fault of the OT, per se, but rather the Rabbinic and priestly understanding of the era). </p><p> </p><p>In fact so much of an advocate of women was Jesus that at his trial one of the pieces of evidence used to support his execution was to do with his emancipation of women. <span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-size: 10px">A variant reading of Luke 23:2, 5 from the church father Epiphanius reads: </span></span></span></span></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></span></span></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></p><p></span><p style="text-align: left"></p><p></span><p style="text-align: left"></p><p></span><p style="text-align: left"></p><p></span><p style="text-align: left"><em><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="font-size: 12px">"They began their accusation by saying, 'We found this man inciting</span></span></span></span></em></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><em><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">our people to a revolt, opposing payment of the tribute to Caesar,</span></span></em></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><em><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">leading astray the women and the children, and claiming to be Christ,</span></span></em></span></span><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><em><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">a king:...and he has turned our children and wives away from us for</span></span></em></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><em><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">they are not bathed as we are, nor do they purify themselves."</span></span></em></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black">Some Jewish Rabbis firmly declared "Let the words of Torah rather be destroyed by fire than imparted to women". The male-dominated society of the time didn't generaly value women's lives and work. An example of this can be found in the work <em>Special Laws</em> by the Jewish philosopher Philo: "<em>The women are best suited to the indoor life which never strays from the house</em> …" </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black">The terrible sexism which Jesus had to fight is highlighted by this passage: </span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">"...Just then his disciples came. <strong>They were astonished that he was speaking with a woman</strong>, but no one said, "What do you want?" or, "Why are you speaking with her?..." </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">- (John 4:27)</span> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="color: black">Jesus' attitude could not have been more different. One of the best stories highighting this is Jesus' interaction with Mary and Martha. It is, as one interpreter says, "<em>perhaps the strongest and clearest affirmation on the part of Jesus that the spiritual and intellectual life was just as proper for women as to men</em>" (Swidler 1979:192). </span>: </p><p> </p><p>And here it is in the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible: </p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="font-size: 12px"><strong>Now as they went on their way, he entered a certain village, where a woman named Martha welcomed him into her home. She had a sister named Mary, who sat at the Lord's feet and listened to what he was saying. But Martha was distracted by her many tasks; so she came to him and asked, "Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to do all the work by myself? Tell her then to help me." But the Lord answered her, "Martha, Martha, you are worried and distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken away from her."</strong></span> </p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>"Sat at the Lord's feet" (10:39) is a particularly significant phrase, because Jewish disciples or students sat at the feet of their chosen rabbis or teachers. The apostle Paul, for example, says that he was "<em>brought up. . . at the feet of Gamaliel</em>" (Acts 22:3). In our Mary-Martha story, "<em>Luke is intimating that Mary is a disciple, and as such her behavior is to be emulated</em>" (Witherington 1990:100). Disciples attached themselves and gave their allegiance to particular teachers and the movements they led, as did Jesus' followers, including Mary. To "sit at one's feet" then is a first century Rabbinic phrase indicating that one is receiving instruction in Torah; that is education from one's Rabbi. </p><p> </p><p>"<em>The teaching of women by Jesus is particularly significant when we consider the customs of Judaism in his time. Women. . . were not permitted to study the Scriptures with a rabbi. . . .The story of Mary and Martha (Luke 10:38-42) clearly shows Jesus' willingness to consider women as worthy students. In this text, Mary takes the traditional male role of 'sitting at the feet' or studying with the rabbi. Jesus approves of her interest in intellectual and spiritual matters, for she is told that she has chosen the better part</em>" (McHaffie 1986:15). </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><u>Property/inheritance:</u> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Not an area the New Testament speaks on specifically, since its not a matter of faith and morals (but a secular matter for the state to determine not religion) however women are equal heirs in every respect: </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">"...You husbands in the same way, live with <em>your wives</em> in an understanding way...since she is a woman; and <strong>show her honor as an equal heir</strong> of the grace of life, so that your prayers will not be hindered..." </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>- 1 Peter 3:7</em></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><u>Right to divorce</u></p><p> </p><p>In Jesus' time, a man could divorce his wife, but the wife had no right to divorce her husband. There were no references to a woman giving her husband such a bill. In Mark 10:11-12, Jesus overthrows this tradition and states that neither spouse can divorce the other; he treats the wife and husband equally. In a similar passage in Mark 10:11–12, Jesus widens the scope of the teaching to show that such dissolution may apply to the behavior of either the man or the woman (even though in Jewish custom women could not divorce their husbands, Jesus includes women equally in his charge): "<em>Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery</em>."</p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'"><u>Right to do <em>independent</em> business</u></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">Jesus' ministry was funded by many women of independent means. One of these, his chief provider, was Mary Magdalene an unmarried, wealthy, self-made woman who possesed her own resources and freely lended her patronage to the Jesus Movement: </span></p><p> </p><p>Luke 8:2, 3: "<em>and certain women who had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities—<strong>Mary called Magdalene</strong>, out of whom had come seven demons, <SUP>3</SUP> and Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others <strong>who provided for Him from their substance</strong>."</em></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I honestly cannot see this as being the medeival European criticism of Islam given that Christianity had all but eradicated slavery from the Christian populations of Europe by the 1100s. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-size: 15px">"Nature having made no slaves, all men have an equal right to liberty" </span></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-size: 18px"><em>- Pope Alexander III, 1159</em></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-size: 18px">"Not only the Christian religion, but nature herself, cries out against slavery" </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="font-size: 15px"><em>- Pope Leo X, 1513</em></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 18px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"></span>James Bowden writes of Leo: </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>"...Pope Leo X declared against slavery at a very early stage of its existence, and he did so under somewhat extraordinary circumstances...Leo X was one of the most learned of the popes, and, doubtless was fully aware that, mainly by the voice of the Church, slavery had been extinguished in western Europe..."</strong> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>"...<strong>The maternal love of the Catholic Church embraces all people. As you know, venerable brother, the Church from the beginning sought to completely eliminate slavery, whose wretched yoke has oppressed many people. It is the industrious guardian of the teachings of its Founder [Jesus] who, by His words and those of the apostles, taught men the fraternal necessity which unites the whole world. From Him we recall that everybody has sprung from the same source, was redeemed by the same ransom, and is called to the same eternal happiness. He assumed the neglected cause of the slaves and showed Himself the strong champion of freedom. Insofar as time and circumstances allowed, He gradually and moderately accomplished His goal. Of course, pressing constantly with prudence and planning, He showed what He was striving for in the name of religion, justice, and humanity. In this way He put national prosperity and civilization in general into His debt. This zeal of the Church for liberating the slaves has not languished with the passage of time; on the contrary, the more it bore fruit, the more eagerly it glowed... St. Gregory the Great, Hadrian I, Alexander III, Innocent III, Gregory IX, Pius II, Leo X, Paul III, Urban VIII, Benedict XIV, Pius VII, and Gregory XVI stand out. They applied every effort to eliminate the institution of slavery wherever it existed. They also took care lest the seeds of slavery return to those places from which this evil institution had been cut away</strong>..." </p><p> </p><p><em>- Pope Leo XIII, </em><span style="color: #663300"><em>CATHOLICAE ECCLESIAE, 1890</em> </span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>A Protestant historian Rodney Stark has a great article on how the Catholic Church fought against the institution of slavery: </p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2003/julyweb-only/7-14-53.0.html" target="_blank">http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2003/julyweb-only/7-14-53.0.html</a></p><p> </p><p>Also see this website:</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cuf.org/news/newsdetail.asp?newID=81" target="_blank">http://www.cuf.org/news/newsdetail.asp?newID=81</a></p><p> </p><p>Much love to you!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Archived_member15, post: 161193, member: 17438"] My dear brother Auzer kaurhug [B][I]As-Salaam-Alaikum![/I][/B] Friend, would you mind if I offered my perspective on the above? This is a Sikh forum and I have come here to learn more about Sikhism and to grow in love with my Sikh brothers and sisters. As a result I would rather not discuss my own religion all that much however since this is the interfaith section and its about Muslims and Christians, I would very much appreciate it if you would allow me to comment on your above words. On the one hand I am happy that you have taken the time to read the Bible which some of our Islamic brothers and sisters do not read, since they regard it as a corrupted text. I greatly appreciate and admire such open-mindedness from your good self. I also agree with you that the Qur'an courageously speaks out against the prevalent Arabian practice of infanticide of female babies. I actually know the Sura, which is a Meccan one called the Bee (I read it many years ago when I first studied the Qur'an in depth): [FONT=Arial][I]"When news is brought to one of them of the birth of a female child, his face darkens and he is filled with inward grief. With shame does he hide himself from his people because of the bad news he has had! Shall he retain her on contempt or bury her in the dust? Ah! what an evil they decide on?"[/I][B] (Quran 16:59).[/B] [/FONT] This was certainly an Islamic improvement upon the previous state of affairs in pagan Arabia. In all honesty, however, I do see errors with your representation of the Bible which I think borders slightly on the disrespectful side (I don't think there was any need to insult my religion - Christianity - in retaliation to someone criticizing Islam). I find it very sad that you felt the need to resort to criticizing my religion in response to criticism of Islam :( You write: I hope you don't mind me asking but could you provide us with references for the above statements my dear friend? I think it would be beneficial to this discussion. The Bible teaches the equality of the sexes. This equality is reflected in the Galatian baptismal formula: This text was most probably an early hymn or prayer that every newly baptized Christian sang or prayed with great rejoicing. Certainly the Bible upholds woman's right to education - and most enfatically. Jesus courageously broke the social mores of his time by teaching women on many occassions (the Judaism of the time relegated women largely to the home. This wasn't the fault of the OT, per se, but rather the Rabbinic and priestly understanding of the era). In fact so much of an advocate of women was Jesus that at his trial one of the pieces of evidence used to support his execution was to do with his emancipation of women. [FONT=Arial][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial][SIZE=3][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=2]A variant reading of Luke 23:2, 5 from the church father Epiphanius reads: [/SIZE][/FONT] [LEFT][/LEFT][/SIZE][LEFT][/left][/FONT][LEFT][/left][/SIZE][LEFT][/left][/FONT][LEFT][I][FONT=Arial][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial][SIZE=3]"They began their accusation by saying, 'We found this man inciting[/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/I] [SIZE=3][FONT=Arial][I][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial]our people to a revolt, opposing payment of the tribute to Caesar,[/FONT][/SIZE][/I][/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Arial][I][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial]leading astray the women and the children, and claiming to be Christ,[/FONT][/SIZE][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial] [I][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial]a king:...and he has turned our children and wives away from us for[/FONT][/SIZE][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][/LEFT][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial] [I][SIZE=3][FONT=Arial]they are not bathed as we are, nor do they purify themselves."[/FONT][/SIZE][/I] [/FONT][/SIZE] [COLOR=black]Some Jewish Rabbis firmly declared "Let the words of Torah rather be destroyed by fire than imparted to women". The male-dominated society of the time didn't generaly value women's lives and work. An example of this can be found in the work [I]Special Laws[/I] by the Jewish philosopher Philo: "[I]The women are best suited to the indoor life which never strays from the house[/I] …" [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]The terrible sexism which Jesus had to fight is highlighted by this passage: [/COLOR] [SIZE=3]"...Just then his disciples came. [B]They were astonished that he was speaking with a woman[/B], but no one said, "What do you want?" or, "Why are you speaking with her?..." [/SIZE] [SIZE=3]- (John 4:27)[/SIZE] [COLOR=black]Jesus' attitude could not have been more different. One of the best stories highighting this is Jesus' interaction with Mary and Martha. It is, as one interpreter says, "[I]perhaps the strongest and clearest affirmation on the part of Jesus that the spiritual and intellectual life was just as proper for women as to men[/I]" (Swidler 1979:192). [/COLOR]: And here it is in the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible: [INDENT][SIZE=3][B]Now as they went on their way, he entered a certain village, where a woman named Martha welcomed him into her home. She had a sister named Mary, who sat at the Lord's feet and listened to what he was saying. But Martha was distracted by her many tasks; so she came to him and asked, "Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to do all the work by myself? Tell her then to help me." But the Lord answered her, "Martha, Martha, you are worried and distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken away from her."[/B][/SIZE] [/INDENT]"Sat at the Lord's feet" (10:39) is a particularly significant phrase, because Jewish disciples or students sat at the feet of their chosen rabbis or teachers. The apostle Paul, for example, says that he was "[I]brought up. . . at the feet of Gamaliel[/I]" (Acts 22:3). In our Mary-Martha story, "[I]Luke is intimating that Mary is a disciple, and as such her behavior is to be emulated[/I]" (Witherington 1990:100). Disciples attached themselves and gave their allegiance to particular teachers and the movements they led, as did Jesus' followers, including Mary. To "sit at one's feet" then is a first century Rabbinic phrase indicating that one is receiving instruction in Torah; that is education from one's Rabbi. "[I]The teaching of women by Jesus is particularly significant when we consider the customs of Judaism in his time. Women. . . were not permitted to study the Scriptures with a rabbi. . . .The story of Mary and Martha (Luke 10:38-42) clearly shows Jesus' willingness to consider women as worthy students. In this text, Mary takes the traditional male role of 'sitting at the feet' or studying with the rabbi. Jesus approves of her interest in intellectual and spiritual matters, for she is told that she has chosen the better part[/I]" (McHaffie 1986:15). [U]Property/inheritance:[/U] Not an area the New Testament speaks on specifically, since its not a matter of faith and morals (but a secular matter for the state to determine not religion) however women are equal heirs in every respect: [SIZE=3]"...You husbands in the same way, live with [I]your wives[/I] in an understanding way...since she is a woman; and [B]show her honor as an equal heir[/B] of the grace of life, so that your prayers will not be hindered..." [/SIZE] [SIZE=3][I]- 1 Peter 3:7[/I][/SIZE] [U]Right to divorce[/U] In Jesus' time, a man could divorce his wife, but the wife had no right to divorce her husband. There were no references to a woman giving her husband such a bill. In Mark 10:11-12, Jesus overthrows this tradition and states that neither spouse can divorce the other; he treats the wife and husband equally. In a similar passage in Mark 10:11–12, Jesus widens the scope of the teaching to show that such dissolution may apply to the behavior of either the man or the woman (even though in Jewish custom women could not divorce their husbands, Jesus includes women equally in his charge): "[I]Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery[/I]." [FONT=Trebuchet MS][U]Right to do [I]independent[/I] business[/U][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]Jesus' ministry was funded by many women of independent means. One of these, his chief provider, was Mary Magdalene an unmarried, wealthy, self-made woman who possesed her own resources and freely lended her patronage to the Jesus Movement: [/FONT] Luke 8:2, 3: "[I]and certain women who had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities—[B]Mary called Magdalene[/B], out of whom had come seven demons, <SUP>3</SUP> and Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others [B]who provided for Him from their substance[/B]."[/I] I honestly cannot see this as being the medeival European criticism of Islam given that Christianity had all but eradicated slavery from the Christian populations of Europe by the 1100s. [SIZE=5][SIZE=4]"Nature having made no slaves, all men have an equal right to liberty" [/SIZE] [SIZE=5][I]- Pope Alexander III, 1159[/I][/SIZE] [SIZE=5]"Not only the Christian religion, but nature herself, cries out against slavery" [/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=5][SIZE=4][I]- Pope Leo X, 1513[/I][/SIZE] [/SIZE]James Bowden writes of Leo: [B]"...Pope Leo X declared against slavery at a very early stage of its existence, and he did so under somewhat extraordinary circumstances...Leo X was one of the most learned of the popes, and, doubtless was fully aware that, mainly by the voice of the Church, slavery had been extinguished in western Europe..."[/B] "...[B]The maternal love of the Catholic Church embraces all people. As you know, venerable brother, the Church from the beginning sought to completely eliminate slavery, whose wretched yoke has oppressed many people. It is the industrious guardian of the teachings of its Founder [Jesus] who, by His words and those of the apostles, taught men the fraternal necessity which unites the whole world. From Him we recall that everybody has sprung from the same source, was redeemed by the same ransom, and is called to the same eternal happiness. He assumed the neglected cause of the slaves and showed Himself the strong champion of freedom. Insofar as time and circumstances allowed, He gradually and moderately accomplished His goal. Of course, pressing constantly with prudence and planning, He showed what He was striving for in the name of religion, justice, and humanity. In this way He put national prosperity and civilization in general into His debt. This zeal of the Church for liberating the slaves has not languished with the passage of time; on the contrary, the more it bore fruit, the more eagerly it glowed... St. Gregory the Great, Hadrian I, Alexander III, Innocent III, Gregory IX, Pius II, Leo X, Paul III, Urban VIII, Benedict XIV, Pius VII, and Gregory XVI stand out. They applied every effort to eliminate the institution of slavery wherever it existed. They also took care lest the seeds of slavery return to those places from which this evil institution had been cut away[/B]..." [I]- Pope Leo XIII, [/I][COLOR=#663300][I]CATHOLICAE ECCLESIAE, 1890[/I] [/COLOR] A Protestant historian Rodney Stark has a great article on how the Catholic Church fought against the institution of slavery: [URL]http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2003/julyweb-only/7-14-53.0.html[/URL] Also see this website: [URL]http://www.cuf.org/news/newsdetail.asp?newID=81[/URL] Much love to you! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Do Christians And Muslims Worship The Same God?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top