☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Answer Evil With Goodness !
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sinister" data-source="post: 53473" data-attributes="member: 2684"><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Dear Surinder Kaur.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Your words do not hurt me…they simply do not have any validity on a philosophy DISCUSSION site. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">All I ask from you is to refrain from labeling people (especially people you don’t know) as egoists. Passing labels around is an easy job whether this stems from some form of insecurity or not I don’t know and I don’t really care. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">But from examining many of the posts you have participated in I have noticed one element that is distinguishable…they all end up in personalized discussion of someone else’s persona. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">I get no sense of humble/respectful opinion just discrediting character assessment and labeling? </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Incognito or not these attacks are meant to degrade a person self-image rather than debate the topic at hand. Could you imagine if the scientific community or any other community started to debase theories/translations simply on the basis of personalized issues? They would achieve nothing but hate mongering. I strongly believe that you and I are past the stage of life where we need to result in name calling.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">“you cannot tell others to leave their ideas at the door because you don't like them or their ideas.” –SKC.</span></span></span></strong><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Now you are distorting what I said…which is ….refrain from labeling NOT from adding ideas. And now that we are at the topic; exactly what ideas did you add to this debate? …none to my recollection</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">So refrain from calling people egoists, distorters, massalla-talkers and the like if you have no valuable input (helps improve the debate and give it direction).</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Use words like; I disagree because…. Because….</span></span></p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">We can be benign or we can be S-I-N-I-S-T-E-R, it all depends how we explore the issue on hand.</span></span></strong><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">What is this suppose to mean? </span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">To be sinister is to be a leftist. That is what I am…that is what I believe a Sikh should be…unconventional and always questioning authority or the dominant voices of society (a liberal movement…always in favour of positive reform).</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">There are many more things, if one want, every panna of Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Granth Sahib Ji can provide you this kind of masalaa, if this is what you are looking for :{-<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </span></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">…</span></span></span></strong><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">you can debate on the issue of why Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Nanak Dev Ji and Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Gobind Singh Ji have a different lifestyle <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /> </span></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">....</span></span></span></strong><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">you are not the first one lost in these issues and you are not the only one either :hmm: </span></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">... </span></span></span></strong><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span><strong><span style="color: blue"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">lots of history you can find that can confuse you, support you, reject you, AND satisfy your ego :whisling: </span></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px">........ </span></span></span></strong><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"></span></p><p><span style="color: black"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">What is this suppose to mean? </span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="color: black">I am out to satisfy my big ego, right? How does that relate to the debate at hand? How am I lost? Please bless me with your Gyaan then by debating the issue at hand!</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="color: black"></span>PS: this is my last post directed towards yourself. I possess neither the time nor stamina to participate in more erroneous personalized discussions that you so “tenderly” construct.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: red"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Wingdings'"><span style="font-family: 'Wingdings'">à</span></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">Look at the eloquence of Ripdrool’s or aad0002 statements…explaining “answer evil with goodness” as a metaphor (which we all understand it to be). But if you don’t read between the lines here then you will most likely be disappointed because most evil cannot be answered with goodness (which is common sense)…thus the shabad as I initially stated carries a larger aesthetic value rather than dictating some universal principle. (can we at least agree on this?)</span></span></strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sinister, post: 53473, member: 2684"] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Dear Surinder Kaur.[/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Your words do not hurt me…they simply do not have any validity on a philosophy DISCUSSION site. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]All I ask from you is to refrain from labeling people (especially people you don’t know) as egoists. Passing labels around is an easy job whether this stems from some form of insecurity or not I don’t know and I don’t really care. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]But from examining many of the posts you have participated in I have noticed one element that is distinguishable…they all end up in personalized discussion of someone else’s persona. [/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]I get no sense of humble/respectful opinion just discrediting character assessment and labeling? [/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Incognito or not these attacks are meant to degrade a person self-image rather than debate the topic at hand. Could you imagine if the scientific community or any other community started to debase theories/translations simply on the basis of personalized issues? They would achieve nothing but hate mongering. I strongly believe that you and I are past the stage of life where we need to result in name calling.[/SIZE][/FONT] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]“you cannot tell others to leave their ideas at the door because you don't like them or their ideas.” –SKC.[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=black] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Now you are distorting what I said…which is ….refrain from labeling NOT from adding ideas. And now that we are at the topic; exactly what ideas did you add to this debate? …none to my recollection[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]So refrain from calling people egoists, distorters, massalla-talkers and the like if you have no valuable input (helps improve the debate and give it direction).[/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Use words like; I disagree because…. Because….[/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE] [B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman]We can be benign or we can be S-I-N-I-S-T-E-R, it all depends how we explore the issue on hand.[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=black] [/COLOR] [COLOR=black][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]What is this suppose to mean? [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]To be sinister is to be a leftist. That is what I am…that is what I believe a Sikh should be…unconventional and always questioning authority or the dominant voices of society (a liberal movement…always in favour of positive reform).[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [B][COLOR=blue][SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]There are many more things, if one want, every panna of Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Granth Sahib Ji can provide you this kind of masalaa, if this is what you are looking for :{-(: [/FONT][/SIZE][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]…[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=black] [/COLOR][B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]you can debate on the issue of why Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Nanak Dev Ji and Dhan Dhan Siri Guru Gobind Singh Ji have a different lifestyle :cool: [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]....[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=black] [/COLOR][B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]you are not the first one lost in these issues and you are not the only one either :hmm: [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]... [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=black] [/COLOR][B][COLOR=blue][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]lots of history you can find that can confuse you, support you, reject you, AND satisfy your ego :whisling: [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]........ [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=black] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman]What is this suppose to mean? [/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=black]I am out to satisfy my big ego, right? How does that relate to the debate at hand? How am I lost? Please bless me with your Gyaan then by debating the issue at hand! [/COLOR]PS: this is my last post directed towards yourself. I possess neither the time nor stamina to participate in more erroneous personalized discussions that you so “tenderly” construct.[/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3][/SIZE][/FONT] [COLOR=red][B][FONT=Wingdings][FONT=Wingdings]à[/FONT][/FONT][FONT='Times New Roman'][SIZE=2]Look at the eloquence of Ripdrool’s or aad0002 statements…explaining “answer evil with goodness” as a metaphor (which we all understand it to be). But if you don’t read between the lines here then you will most likely be disappointed because most evil cannot be answered with goodness (which is common sense)…thus the shabad as I initially stated carries a larger aesthetic value rather than dictating some universal principle. (can we at least agree on this?)[/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
Answer Evil With Goodness !
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top