☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Hard Talk
A Rejoinder to Pujari Sikhs and Woke Sikhs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSikhRenaissance" data-source="post: 221512" data-attributes="member: 23670"><p>This article is in regards to certain controversial statements made by individuals claiming Sikh origins on social media in the recent few weeks.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Combustion:</strong></span></p><p>In the early 2000’s controversial Sikh intellectual Gurbaksh Singh Kala Afghana published a loaded comment,</p><p></p><p><em>“Neither the Khanda (cleaver) nor the Bata (bowl) make one a Khalsa, it is only Gurbani which retains the prerogative to make one the Khalsa…”</em></p><p></p><p>Given Singh’s anti-Dasam Granth/Sampradaic stance, it was no wonder that his words were inimically misinterpreted by his detractors to ignite controversy which witnessed total chaos across the Sikh world. Common sense, as one observer noted, had truly extended its vacation with regards to the Sikhs. Later, with the spread of Afghana’s books among the mainstream, it became evident that the man had a valid point. Falsely accused of molestation and even political treachery at one point in his life, Gurbaksh Singh is only now receiving his dues two years after his demise. Hounded by the self-proclaimed Sikh clergy at the Akal Takhat while alive, he nonetheless continued his intellectual battle against what he deemed to be the <em>Pujari </em>infiltration within Sikhi until his last breath. So what was it about his perception of <em>Amrit</em> which earned him his share of infamy?</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Amrit vs. Amrit:</strong></span></p><p>As a concept, <em>Amrit</em> is ubiquitous in Indic lore. But contrary to the modern <em>Sanataan </em>school which ignores all antecedents to impose itself as some parental umbrella of other faiths, its conceptual definition varies across the spectrum. In Vedic lore it is an ambrosial liquor which bestows divine powers and is the fount of all immortality. The forced osmosis of Jainism with proto-Vedism evolved this understanding into a concept which held that renunciation was true <em>Amrit </em>as it dispelled the illusion of false <em>Amrit </em>which is Creation.</p><p></p><p>Buddhism proposed that <em>Amrit </em>was an internal process via which mental equilibrium was acquired and connective action nullified. Connective in the sense that both good and bad attached one to the world which was the fount of all misery. The further sundering of Buddhism on regional grounds lent further dimension to the conceptual evolution of <em>Amrit. </em>In Chinese Buddhism <em>Amrit </em>emerged as a consumable sanctified by religious mantras. In Tibetan Buddhism, <em>Amrit </em>was accepted to be any consumable with restorative properties.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Nanak:</strong></span></p><p>To convey the Sikh ethos to otherwise non-Sikh masses, Guru Nanak adopted prevalent terms and redefined them in the context of his broader philosophy. As illustrated above, the concept of <em>Amrit </em>by the time of Guru Nanak’s birth was figurative for renunciation. The Guru, in line with his established practice, revamped its meaning. This new definition was preserved by his successors.</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਗੁਰ ਕਾ ਸਬਦੁ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤੁ ਹੈ ਜਿਤੁ ਪੀਤੈ ਤਿਖ ਜਾਇ ॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“The instruction of the Guru (emanating from the truth) is the ambrosia (<em>Amrit</em>) partaking of which all thirst is quenched.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 35.</p><p></p><p>What was the attraction of this new <em>Amrit</em>?</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਗੁਰਿ ਪੂਰੈ ਸਭੁ ਪੂਰਾ ਕੀਆ ॥ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਨਾਮੁ ਰਿਦ ਮਹਿ ਦੀਆ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ </strong></em></p><p></p><p>“The perfect Guru has made the human life purposeful by attaching it to the truth. The Guru has done this by planting truth within the mind. Now wisdom and virtue pervade the heart.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 1184.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Life:</strong></span></p><p>The Sikh life is one in which the <em>Amrit </em>of human intelligence is paramount. This Sikh ambrosia is not second party i.e. it is received from any exterior source. The physical Guru (Guru Nanak-Guru Granth) posits one on the path to discover it within themselves. It cannot be unlocked through either meditation or alluding Creation to be false. To partake of this ambrosia one requires a purposeful life in which virtue is cultivated and then utilized to better oneself and the world.</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਪੀਊ ਦਾਦੇ ਕਾ ਖੋਲਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਖਜਾਨਾ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਤਾ ਮੇਰੈ ਮਨਿ ਭਇਆ ਨਿਧਾਨਾ ॥੧॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਰਤਨ ਲਾਲ ਜਾ ਕਾ ਕਛੂ ਨ ਮੋਲੁ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਭਰੇ ਭੰਡਾਰ ਅਖੂਟ ਅਤੋਲ ॥੨॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਖਾਵਹਿ ਖਰਚਹਿ ਰਲਿ ਮਿਲਿ ਭਾਈ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਤੋਟਿ ਨ ਆਵੈ ਵਧਦੋ ਜਾਈ ॥੩॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਕਹੁ ਨਾਨਕ ਜਿਸੁ ਮਸਤਕਿ ਲੇਖੁ ਲਿਖਾਇ ॥</strong></em></p><p><em><strong></strong></em></p><p><em><strong>ਸੁ ਏਤੁ ਖਜਾਨੈ ਲਇਆ ਰਲਾਇ ॥੪॥੩੧॥੧੦੦॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“The ancestral treasure trove of humanity, upon opening it my mind found perpetual solace. Within it I discovered countless, precious jewels. It is such a trove which is forever full. Gather and partake of it as you will. Add to it, take from it there is no debt incurred. Nanak says that they who make their own destiny worthy, they receive the keys to this treasure.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 186.</p><p></p><p>And,</p><p></p><p><em><strong>ਮਤਿ ਵਿਚਿ ਰਤਨ ਜਵਾਹਰ ਮਾਣਿਕ ਜੇ ਇਕ ਗੁਰ ਕੀ ਸਿਖ ਸੁਣੀ ॥</strong></em></p><p></p><p>“Within the (human) intellect there are priceless jewels, these can only be acquired if the Sikh heeds the Guru’s instructions.”</p><p></p><p>-Guru Granth, 2.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>1698:</strong></span></p><p>In light of the above, how are the events of 1698 in which Guru Gobind Singh initiated the practice of <em>Khande Bate Da Amrit </em>to be interpreted? It should be remembered that contrary to the current Postmodernist/<em>Sanataan </em>narrative, Guru Nanak was never an ultra-orthodox pacifist in the same vein as the Vedic religiosity. He established the foundations of an unique lifestyle in which dignity and virtue were to be used to contribute towards the progress of Creation. While a plethora of inter-contradictory texts exist arguing that prior to 1698 the practice of initiation into Sikhi consisted of an acolyte drinking water in which the incumbent Guru’s feet were washed, this does not seem viable in the light of <em>Gurbani. </em>The Gurus by no means were attaching Sikhs with themselves but orienting them towards the path of truth. It is probable that the early Sikh initiation consisted of an acolyte retaining unshorn hair and publicly being confirmed as a Sikh after forfeiting their ancestral faith.</p><p></p><p>The emphasis placed by the progenitor Guru on resistance to tyranny and living a life encumbered by any form of oppression witnessed the Sikhs take up arms to protect themselves under the fifth Guru onwards. In 1698 Guru Gobind Singh created a highly conspicuous ceremony via which to initiate the Sikhs into Sikhi post-Guru era. He took a <em>Khanda </em>(broadsword) and dissolved sugar crystals into a cauldron full of water while stirring with the said <em>Khanda. </em>This symbolized death and when the Sikh partook of the resultant mixture it underscored their acceptance of human mortality and desire to use it to impel change in the worldly paradigm.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong><strong>Gurbaksh Singh:</strong></strong></span></p><p>So what was it about Gurbaksh Singh’s statement which brought the sky down atop his head? The contentious scholar pointed out the dichotomy between the Gurus’ understanding of <em>Amrit </em>and the current understanding of the issue. For Guru Gobind Singh, keeping in consort with Guru Nanak’s philosophy, the mixture made in the cauldron was not <em>Amrit. </em>It was a semiotic ceremony through which the initiate discarded all forms of orthopraxy and belief in past faiths to conform their pledge to follow the Sikh way of life wholly. Such a Sikh would be the Khalsa-the perfect embodiment of Sikhi. The Khalsa, itself, would be a fraternity forever confronting societal atrophy through its very beliefs.</p><p></p><p>For Gurbaksh Singh the devil was in the detail. The fact that since the dormancy of the Lahore Singh-Sabha, Sikh <em>Pujaris </em>were promoting that the ceremony alone was divine had hampered the Sikhs at countless turns in their history.</p><p></p><p><em>“Neither the Khanda (cleaver) nor the Bata (bowl) make one a Khalsa, it is only Gurbani which retains the prerogative to make one the Khalsa…”</em></p><p></p><p>His statement essentially articulated that the ceremony devised by the tenth Guru was not the ends but a means to an ends. Had it been the ends then the institute of Sikh <em>Amrit </em>would have been divine and resistant to abuse. The recent history of the Sikhs, the 80’s which he witnessed, evinced that this was not the case. The <em>Khanda</em> and the <em>Bata </em>were the keys to the true <em>Amrit </em>which lent the ceremony its name. This <em>Amrit</em> was intelligence and could only be partake of through living as per <em>Gurbani.</em></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>Rehat:</strong></span></p><p>Gurbaksh Singh left no stone unturned in exposing the allegedly divine <em>Rehats </em>of the <em>Pujari </em>factions. This was misinterpreted by his detractors to argue that he was anti-<em>Rehat. </em>His genuine words, in his books, convey the authenticity of his views which are analogous to <em>Gurbani. Rehat</em> was the simplified discipline which allowed a Sikh to imbibe <em>Gurbani </em>in their life. Its parameters were decided by <em>Gurbani</em> rather than human culturalism.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 22px"><strong>In Ending:</strong></span></p><p>Quoting Gurbaksh Singh is a controversial act. The man might have died but his legacy continues to confront the <em>Pujari </em>orbit pervading Sikhi today. But in today’s age where unfounded allegations are being made that Guru Nanak was a closet homosexual or statements being made to the effect that <em>{censored} Rehat</em>, maybe it is high time we unearth Gurbaksh Singh’s words and understand them for what they truly are. An explanation of true Sikhi as opposed to <em>Pujari Sikhi </em>and today’s <em>woke </em>neo-Sikhi which would have us alter <em>Gurbani </em>in order to synchronize ourselves with whatever vogue permeates the world’s attention at present.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/the-pursuit-of-purity[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSikhRenaissance, post: 221512, member: 23670"] This article is in regards to certain controversial statements made by individuals claiming Sikh origins on social media in the recent few weeks. [SIZE=6][B]Combustion:[/B][/SIZE] In the early 2000’s controversial Sikh intellectual Gurbaksh Singh Kala Afghana published a loaded comment, [I]“Neither the Khanda (cleaver) nor the Bata (bowl) make one a Khalsa, it is only Gurbani which retains the prerogative to make one the Khalsa…”[/I] Given Singh’s anti-Dasam Granth/Sampradaic stance, it was no wonder that his words were inimically misinterpreted by his detractors to ignite controversy which witnessed total chaos across the Sikh world. Common sense, as one observer noted, had truly extended its vacation with regards to the Sikhs. Later, with the spread of Afghana’s books among the mainstream, it became evident that the man had a valid point. Falsely accused of molestation and even political treachery at one point in his life, Gurbaksh Singh is only now receiving his dues two years after his demise. Hounded by the self-proclaimed Sikh clergy at the Akal Takhat while alive, he nonetheless continued his intellectual battle against what he deemed to be the [I]Pujari [/I]infiltration within Sikhi until his last breath. So what was it about his perception of [I]Amrit[/I] which earned him his share of infamy? [SIZE=6][B]Amrit vs. Amrit:[/B][/SIZE] As a concept, [I]Amrit[/I] is ubiquitous in Indic lore. But contrary to the modern [I]Sanataan [/I]school which ignores all antecedents to impose itself as some parental umbrella of other faiths, its conceptual definition varies across the spectrum. In Vedic lore it is an ambrosial liquor which bestows divine powers and is the fount of all immortality. The forced osmosis of Jainism with proto-Vedism evolved this understanding into a concept which held that renunciation was true [I]Amrit [/I]as it dispelled the illusion of false [I]Amrit [/I]which is Creation. Buddhism proposed that [I]Amrit [/I]was an internal process via which mental equilibrium was acquired and connective action nullified. Connective in the sense that both good and bad attached one to the world which was the fount of all misery. The further sundering of Buddhism on regional grounds lent further dimension to the conceptual evolution of [I]Amrit. [/I]In Chinese Buddhism [I]Amrit [/I]emerged as a consumable sanctified by religious mantras. In Tibetan Buddhism, [I]Amrit [/I]was accepted to be any consumable with restorative properties. [SIZE=6][B]Nanak:[/B][/SIZE] To convey the Sikh ethos to otherwise non-Sikh masses, Guru Nanak adopted prevalent terms and redefined them in the context of his broader philosophy. As illustrated above, the concept of [I]Amrit [/I]by the time of Guru Nanak’s birth was figurative for renunciation. The Guru, in line with his established practice, revamped its meaning. This new definition was preserved by his successors. [I][B]ਗੁਰ ਕਾ ਸਬਦੁ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤੁ ਹੈ ਜਿਤੁ ਪੀਤੈ ਤਿਖ ਜਾਇ ॥[/B][/I] “The instruction of the Guru (emanating from the truth) is the ambrosia ([I]Amrit[/I]) partaking of which all thirst is quenched.” -Guru Granth, 35. What was the attraction of this new [I]Amrit[/I]? [I][B]ਗੁਰਿ ਪੂਰੈ ਸਭੁ ਪੂਰਾ ਕੀਆ ॥ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਨਾਮੁ ਰਿਦ ਮਹਿ ਦੀਆ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ [/B][/I] “The perfect Guru has made the human life purposeful by attaching it to the truth. The Guru has done this by planting truth within the mind. Now wisdom and virtue pervade the heart.” -Guru Granth, 1184. [SIZE=6][B]Life:[/B][/SIZE] The Sikh life is one in which the [I]Amrit [/I]of human intelligence is paramount. This Sikh ambrosia is not second party i.e. it is received from any exterior source. The physical Guru (Guru Nanak-Guru Granth) posits one on the path to discover it within themselves. It cannot be unlocked through either meditation or alluding Creation to be false. To partake of this ambrosia one requires a purposeful life in which virtue is cultivated and then utilized to better oneself and the world. [I][B]ਪੀਊ ਦਾਦੇ ਕਾ ਖੋਲਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਖਜਾਨਾ ॥ ਤਾ ਮੇਰੈ ਮਨਿ ਭਇਆ ਨਿਧਾਨਾ ॥੧॥ ਰਤਨ ਲਾਲ ਜਾ ਕਾ ਕਛੂ ਨ ਮੋਲੁ ॥ ਭਰੇ ਭੰਡਾਰ ਅਖੂਟ ਅਤੋਲ ॥੨॥ ਖਾਵਹਿ ਖਰਚਹਿ ਰਲਿ ਮਿਲਿ ਭਾਈ ॥ ਤੋਟਿ ਨ ਆਵੈ ਵਧਦੋ ਜਾਈ ॥੩॥ ਕਹੁ ਨਾਨਕ ਜਿਸੁ ਮਸਤਕਿ ਲੇਖੁ ਲਿਖਾਇ ॥ ਸੁ ਏਤੁ ਖਜਾਨੈ ਲਇਆ ਰਲਾਇ ॥੪॥੩੧॥੧੦੦॥[/B][/I] “The ancestral treasure trove of humanity, upon opening it my mind found perpetual solace. Within it I discovered countless, precious jewels. It is such a trove which is forever full. Gather and partake of it as you will. Add to it, take from it there is no debt incurred. Nanak says that they who make their own destiny worthy, they receive the keys to this treasure.” -Guru Granth, 186. And, [I][B]ਮਤਿ ਵਿਚਿ ਰਤਨ ਜਵਾਹਰ ਮਾਣਿਕ ਜੇ ਇਕ ਗੁਰ ਕੀ ਸਿਖ ਸੁਣੀ ॥[/B][/I] “Within the (human) intellect there are priceless jewels, these can only be acquired if the Sikh heeds the Guru’s instructions.” -Guru Granth, 2. [SIZE=6][B]1698:[/B][/SIZE] In light of the above, how are the events of 1698 in which Guru Gobind Singh initiated the practice of [I]Khande Bate Da Amrit [/I]to be interpreted? It should be remembered that contrary to the current Postmodernist/[I]Sanataan [/I]narrative, Guru Nanak was never an ultra-orthodox pacifist in the same vein as the Vedic religiosity. He established the foundations of an unique lifestyle in which dignity and virtue were to be used to contribute towards the progress of Creation. While a plethora of inter-contradictory texts exist arguing that prior to 1698 the practice of initiation into Sikhi consisted of an acolyte drinking water in which the incumbent Guru’s feet were washed, this does not seem viable in the light of [I]Gurbani. [/I]The Gurus by no means were attaching Sikhs with themselves but orienting them towards the path of truth. It is probable that the early Sikh initiation consisted of an acolyte retaining unshorn hair and publicly being confirmed as a Sikh after forfeiting their ancestral faith. The emphasis placed by the progenitor Guru on resistance to tyranny and living a life encumbered by any form of oppression witnessed the Sikhs take up arms to protect themselves under the fifth Guru onwards. In 1698 Guru Gobind Singh created a highly conspicuous ceremony via which to initiate the Sikhs into Sikhi post-Guru era. He took a [I]Khanda [/I](broadsword) and dissolved sugar crystals into a cauldron full of water while stirring with the said [I]Khanda. [/I]This symbolized death and when the Sikh partook of the resultant mixture it underscored their acceptance of human mortality and desire to use it to impel change in the worldly paradigm. [SIZE=6][B][B]Gurbaksh Singh:[/B][/B][/SIZE] So what was it about Gurbaksh Singh’s statement which brought the sky down atop his head? The contentious scholar pointed out the dichotomy between the Gurus’ understanding of [I]Amrit [/I]and the current understanding of the issue. For Guru Gobind Singh, keeping in consort with Guru Nanak’s philosophy, the mixture made in the cauldron was not [I]Amrit. [/I]It was a semiotic ceremony through which the initiate discarded all forms of orthopraxy and belief in past faiths to conform their pledge to follow the Sikh way of life wholly. Such a Sikh would be the Khalsa-the perfect embodiment of Sikhi. The Khalsa, itself, would be a fraternity forever confronting societal atrophy through its very beliefs. For Gurbaksh Singh the devil was in the detail. The fact that since the dormancy of the Lahore Singh-Sabha, Sikh [I]Pujaris [/I]were promoting that the ceremony alone was divine had hampered the Sikhs at countless turns in their history. [I]“Neither the Khanda (cleaver) nor the Bata (bowl) make one a Khalsa, it is only Gurbani which retains the prerogative to make one the Khalsa…”[/I] His statement essentially articulated that the ceremony devised by the tenth Guru was not the ends but a means to an ends. Had it been the ends then the institute of Sikh [I]Amrit [/I]would have been divine and resistant to abuse. The recent history of the Sikhs, the 80’s which he witnessed, evinced that this was not the case. The [I]Khanda[/I] and the [I]Bata [/I]were the keys to the true [I]Amrit [/I]which lent the ceremony its name. This [I]Amrit[/I] was intelligence and could only be partake of through living as per [I]Gurbani.[/I] [SIZE=6][B]Rehat:[/B][/SIZE] Gurbaksh Singh left no stone unturned in exposing the allegedly divine [I]Rehats [/I]of the [I]Pujari [/I]factions. This was misinterpreted by his detractors to argue that he was anti-[I]Rehat. [/I]His genuine words, in his books, convey the authenticity of his views which are analogous to [I]Gurbani. Rehat[/I] was the simplified discipline which allowed a Sikh to imbibe [I]Gurbani [/I]in their life. Its parameters were decided by [I]Gurbani[/I] rather than human culturalism. [SIZE=6][B]In Ending:[/B][/SIZE] Quoting Gurbaksh Singh is a controversial act. The man might have died but his legacy continues to confront the [I]Pujari [/I]orbit pervading Sikhi today. But in today’s age where unfounded allegations are being made that Guru Nanak was a closet homosexual or statements being made to the effect that [I]{censored} Rehat[/I], maybe it is high time we unearth Gurbaksh Singh’s words and understand them for what they truly are. An explanation of true Sikhi as opposed to [I]Pujari Sikhi [/I]and today’s [I]woke [/I]neo-Sikhi which would have us alter [I]Gurbani [/I]in order to synchronize ourselves with whatever vogue permeates the world’s attention at present. [URL unfurl="true"]https://thesikhrenaissance.substack.com/p/the-pursuit-of-purity[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Hard Talk
A Rejoinder to Pujari Sikhs and Woke Sikhs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top