☀️ JOIN SPN MOBILE
Forums
New posts
Guru Granth Sahib
Composition, Arrangement & Layout
ਜਪੁ | Jup
ਸੋ ਦਰੁ | So Dar
ਸੋਹਿਲਾ | Sohilaa
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਿਰੀਰਾਗੁ | Raag Siree-Raag
Gurbani (14-53)
Ashtpadiyan (53-71)
Gurbani (71-74)
Pahre (74-78)
Chhant (78-81)
Vanjara (81-82)
Vaar Siri Raag (83-91)
Bhagat Bani (91-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਝ | Raag Maajh
Gurbani (94-109)
Ashtpadi (109)
Ashtpadiyan (110-129)
Ashtpadi (129-130)
Ashtpadiyan (130-133)
Bara Maha (133-136)
Din Raen (136-137)
Vaar Maajh Ki (137-150)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗਉੜੀ | Raag Gauree
Gurbani (151-185)
Quartets/Couplets (185-220)
Ashtpadiyan (220-234)
Karhalei (234-235)
Ashtpadiyan (235-242)
Chhant (242-249)
Baavan Akhari (250-262)
Sukhmani (262-296)
Thittee (296-300)
Gauree kii Vaar (300-323)
Gurbani (323-330)
Ashtpadiyan (330-340)
Baavan Akhari (340-343)
Thintteen (343-344)
Vaar Kabir (344-345)
Bhagat Bani (345-346)
ਰਾਗੁ ਆਸਾ | Raag Aasaa
Gurbani (347-348)
Chaupaday (348-364)
Panchpadde (364-365)
Kaafee (365-409)
Aasaavaree (409-411)
Ashtpadiyan (411-432)
Patee (432-435)
Chhant (435-462)
Vaar Aasaa (462-475)
Bhagat Bani (475-488)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੂਜਰੀ | Raag Goojaree
Gurbani (489-503)
Ashtpadiyan (503-508)
Vaar Gujari (508-517)
Vaar Gujari (517-526)
ਰਾਗੁ ਦੇਵਗੰਧਾਰੀ | Raag Dayv-Gandhaaree
Gurbani (527-536)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਹਾਗੜਾ | Raag Bihaagraa
Gurbani (537-556)
Chhant (538-548)
Vaar Bihaagraa (548-556)
ਰਾਗੁ ਵਡਹੰਸ | Raag Wadhans
Gurbani (557-564)
Ashtpadiyan (564-565)
Chhant (565-575)
Ghoriaan (575-578)
Alaahaniiaa (578-582)
Vaar Wadhans (582-594)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੋਰਠਿ | Raag Sorath
Gurbani (595-634)
Asatpadhiya (634-642)
Vaar Sorath (642-659)
ਰਾਗੁ ਧਨਾਸਰੀ | Raag Dhanasaree
Gurbani (660-685)
Astpadhiya (685-687)
Chhant (687-691)
Bhagat Bani (691-695)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਤਸਰੀ | Raag Jaitsree
Gurbani (696-703)
Chhant (703-705)
Vaar Jaitsaree (705-710)
Bhagat Bani (710)
ਰਾਗੁ ਟੋਡੀ | Raag Todee
ਰਾਗੁ ਬੈਰਾੜੀ | Raag Bairaaree
ਰਾਗੁ ਤਿਲੰਗ | Raag Tilang
Gurbani (721-727)
Bhagat Bani (727)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸੂਹੀ | Raag Suhi
Gurbani (728-750)
Ashtpadiyan (750-761)
Kaafee (761-762)
Suchajee (762)
Gunvantee (763)
Chhant (763-785)
Vaar Soohee (785-792)
Bhagat Bani (792-794)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਿਲਾਵਲੁ | Raag Bilaaval
Gurbani (795-831)
Ashtpadiyan (831-838)
Thitteen (838-840)
Vaar Sat (841-843)
Chhant (843-848)
Vaar Bilaaval (849-855)
Bhagat Bani (855-858)
ਰਾਗੁ ਗੋਂਡ | Raag Gond
Gurbani (859-869)
Ashtpadiyan (869)
Bhagat Bani (870-875)
ਰਾਗੁ ਰਾਮਕਲੀ | Raag Ramkalee
Ashtpadiyan (902-916)
Gurbani (876-902)
Anand (917-922)
Sadd (923-924)
Chhant (924-929)
Dakhnee (929-938)
Sidh Gosat (938-946)
Vaar Ramkalee (947-968)
ਰਾਗੁ ਨਟ ਨਾਰਾਇਨ | Raag Nat Narayan
Gurbani (975-980)
Ashtpadiyan (980-983)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਲੀ ਗਉੜਾ | Raag Maalee Gauraa
Gurbani (984-988)
Bhagat Bani (988)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਾਰੂ | Raag Maaroo
Gurbani (889-1008)
Ashtpadiyan (1008-1014)
Kaafee (1014-1016)
Ashtpadiyan (1016-1019)
Anjulian (1019-1020)
Solhe (1020-1033)
Dakhni (1033-1043)
ਰਾਗੁ ਤੁਖਾਰੀ | Raag Tukhaari
Bara Maha (1107-1110)
Chhant (1110-1117)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕੇਦਾਰਾ | Raag Kedara
Gurbani (1118-1123)
Bhagat Bani (1123-1124)
ਰਾਗੁ ਭੈਰਉ | Raag Bhairo
Gurbani (1125-1152)
Partaal (1153)
Ashtpadiyan (1153-1167)
ਰਾਗੁ ਬਸੰਤੁ | Raag Basant
Gurbani (1168-1187)
Ashtpadiyan (1187-1193)
Vaar Basant (1193-1196)
ਰਾਗੁ ਸਾਰਗ | Raag Saarag
Gurbani (1197-1200)
Partaal (1200-1231)
Ashtpadiyan (1232-1236)
Chhant (1236-1237)
Vaar Saarang (1237-1253)
ਰਾਗੁ ਮਲਾਰ | Raag Malaar
Gurbani (1254-1293)
Partaal (1265-1273)
Ashtpadiyan (1273-1278)
Chhant (1278)
Vaar Malaar (1278-91)
Bhagat Bani (1292-93)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਾਨੜਾ | Raag Kaanraa
Gurbani (1294-96)
Partaal (1296-1318)
Ashtpadiyan (1308-1312)
Chhant (1312)
Vaar Kaanraa
Bhagat Bani (1318)
ਰਾਗੁ ਕਲਿਆਨ | Raag Kalyaan
Gurbani (1319-23)
Ashtpadiyan (1323-26)
ਰਾਗੁ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਤੀ | Raag Prabhaatee
Gurbani (1327-1341)
Ashtpadiyan (1342-51)
ਰਾਗੁ ਜੈਜਾਵੰਤੀ | Raag Jaijaiwanti
Gurbani (1352-53)
Salok | Gatha | Phunahe | Chaubole | Swayiye
Sehskritee Mahala 1
Sehskritee Mahala 5
Gaathaa Mahala 5
Phunhay Mahala 5
Chaubolae Mahala 5
Shaloks Bhagat Kabir
Shaloks Sheikh Farid
Swaiyyae Mahala 5
Swaiyyae in Praise of Gurus
Shaloks in Addition To Vaars
Shalok Ninth Mehl
Mundavanee Mehl 5
ਰਾਗ ਮਾਲਾ, Raag Maalaa
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Videos
New media
New comments
Library
Latest reviews
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
Sign up
Log in
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
2 Cheers For American Tolerance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spnadmin" data-source="post: 131850" data-attributes="member: 35"><p><span style="color: Blue">Here is another view on the subject of the mosque at Ground Zero. These are not my views. I am posting new content, as i do every day. The authorship and publication information can be found in the link to the original article.</span></p><p>The Ground Zero mosque controversy shows that America manages its hatreds better than others <a href="http://reason.com/people/shikha-dalmia" target="_blank">Shikha Dalmia</a> | August 17, 2010</p><p></p><p></p><p> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://reason.com/media/js/audio-player.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> AudioPlayer.setup("/media/swf/player.swf", { width: 290 }); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> // <![CDATA[ $.getJSON('/outloudopinion/2010/08/17/two-cheers-for-american-tolera', function(data){ if(data.audio != null){ $("#outloudopinion").html('<a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/' + data.rss + '" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/media/icons/outloudopinionmic19x24.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a> Listen to <a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/' + data.audio + '" target="_blank">Audio Version</a> (MP3)</p><p> </p><p>').show(); AudioPlayer.embed("outloudaudio", {soundFile: data.audio, titles:"Two Cheers for American Tolerance"}); }else{ //$("#outloudopinion").html('<a href="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/' + data.rss + '" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/media/icons/outloudopinionmic19x24.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> Listen to Reason.com articles on OutloudOpinion</a></p><p>'); } }); // ]]> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> GA_googleFillSlot("inner1"); </script><script src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?correlator=1282093202318&output=json_html&callback=GA_googleSetAdContentsBySlotForSync&impl=s&prev_afc=8&a2ids=%2CPjxQ%2CN2yQ%2CBO3LQ%2C%2C%2CSziw%2CBOPVQ&cids=%2CLoleNs%2CK7Uu08%2CUf9hC0%2C%2C%2CNV2xiE%2CUZO4L0&pstok=IBlANom6pgAKAAoOCgoIxccPENvxldELEAAKDgoKCMntDRDP9tL2ChAACg4KCgit7k4QrYj2vxQQAAoFELKekQQKAAoOCgoIi-cSEKGM26sNEAAKDgoKCNWeThC9wbuyFBAA&client=ca-pub-4864286300355536&slotname=inner1&page_slots=popups%2Cheader1%2Cheader2%2Cleft1%2Cleft2%2Cleft3%2Cleft4%2Cleft5%2Cinner1&cookie=ID%3D52c735d19e57b76a%3AT%3D1282093267%3AS%3DALNI_Mbyd2Okw-UcL_hBkDrFBIlsil0qXw&cookie_enabled=1&ga_vid=102274211.1282093202&ga_sid=1282093202&ga_hid=1117617899&url=http%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2Farchives%2F2010%2F08%2F17%2Ftwo-cheers-for-american-tolera&lmt=1282093198&dt=1282093204499&cc=100&biw=1007&bih=399&ifi=9&adk=3825352754&u_tz=-240&u_his=1&u_java=true&u_h=600&u_w=1024&u_ah=570&u_aw=1024&u_cd=24&u_nplug=23&u_nmime=115&flash=10.1.53"></script> <ins style="width: 300px; height: 250px; border: 0pt none; display: inline-table; position: relative;"></ins>Sarah Palin has not only revealed herself to be linguistically challenged in "refudiating" the proposed "mosque" near Ground Zero, but also emotionally overwrought. "It stabs hearts," she <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/07/18/sarah-palin-to-muslims-reject-ground-zero-mosque/" target="_blank"> tweeted</a> to her fellow mosque-bashers. But Palin notwithstanding, the way this country has comported itself during this controversy represents a damn fine moment for humanity. As a naturalized American, let me just say that if every country handled its hatreds as well as this one, this world wouldn't be a half-bad place to live in.</p><p></p><p></p><p> <script>GA_googleCreateDomIframe('google_ads_div_inner1' ,'inner1');</script></p><p> It is painfully obvious that opposition to the Cordoba House, as this structure would be called, is motivated less by a desire to protect the memory of 9/11 victims and more by a knee-jerk suspicion of Muslims. If it were not, mosque-bashers wouldn't have so much difficulty processing some basic but crucial facts about the structure. The "mosque," for instance, is not really a mosque but an Islamic community center--complete with a swimming pool, auditorium, bookstores and restaurants—along the lines of the many YMCAs or Jewish community centers around the country.</p><p></p><p></p><p> It will house a place of worship, but it won't blare muezzin calls summoning Muslims to pray five times a day, suggesting that it has a fairly relaxed attitude toward Quranic strictures. Nor will it be a Muslim-only place where members of other faiths are unwelcome; rather it will be open to anyone willing to pay its dues. Best (or worst) of all, it <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-sledge/just-how-far-is-the-groun_b_660585.html" target="_blank"> won't be</a> "on" Ground Zero, but two blocks and a bend away at a spot not visible to World Trade Center visitors.</p><p></p><p></p><p> None of this is preventing some opponents from bizarrely suggesting that the center represents a surreptitious attempt to glorify Islamic victory on American soil. But a victory statement communicated through esoteric means negates itself because such means signal weakness, not strength. What's more, it is one odd victory statement when its alleged authors are not claiming any moral high ground for their putative side. To the contrary, the couple, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf and his wife Daisy Khan, who are spearheading the center, have "refudiated" the 9/11 attacks in particular and Islamic terrorism in general.</p><p></p><p></p><p> They have qualms about U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East that plenty of nonterrorist Americans would share. And they are Sufis, the moderate and mystical sect of Islam that is known for its refined music and art, not its militancy. In fact, by all auguries, they are modern and liberated Muslims who seem rather embarrassed by the hot-headed jihadis who speak for their religion. Their whole project was conceived in order to highlight the more benign, moderate side of Islam and build bridges with other faiths. <em>Newsweek</em> Editor Fareed Zakaria is <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/06/the-real-ground-zero.html" target="_blank">absolutely right</a> when he notes that, "if there is ever going to be a reformist movement in Islam, it is going to emerge from places like the proposed mosque."</p><p></p><p></p><p> It is possible that the center is really an elaborate ruse for some sinister anti-American agenda—just as it is possible that America's next president could be a Manchurian candidate installed by the Chinese. But to suspect such an agenda in the face of massive evidence to the contrary testifies to just how deep-seated the suspicion against Muslims is in this country.</p><p> But this is precisely why it is all the more remarkable that this resentment hasn't boiled over into active persecution—something that would hardly be possible any place else in the world. To be sure, this controversy has triggered a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/us/08mosque.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1" target="_blank"> backlash</a> against other proposed mosques in the country, with opponents holding protest rallies with dogs in tow to taunt Muslims who regard dogs as <em>napaak,</em> or impure. And Republicans in some races have turned this controversy into something of a rallying cry to energize their base.</p><p></p><p></p><p> But that's about the worst of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p> On the other hand, to this country's enormous credit, New York City's Landmark Preservation Commission unanimously rejected demands that it subvert local zoning ordinances allowing houses of worship in the area "as a right" to scuttle the project. (Mosque opponents had wanted the commission to declare the existing Burlington Coat Factory on the site a landmark so that nothing else could be built there.)</p><p></p><p></p><p> The losers have appealed the decision, although they know they have virtually <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2262674" target="_blank">no chance</a> of prevailing. Yet so far they have resorted not to violence but persuasion to convince the couple to go elsewhere. Even Palin's silly tweets are infused with a sweet civility, asking Muslims to reconsider as a gesture of goodwill toward their fellow Americans.</p><p></p><p></p><p> Her request might be wrong-headed, but can anyone think of another country where a major national figure would resort to gentle cajoling to win over members of a vilified minority? Certainly not in continental Europe, which is busy enacting <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/05/19/burqa-france-clothing-women-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html" target="_blank"> burqa bans</a> for no other reason except that the majority wants to bend a minority to its norms. And it would never happen in India, my native country, where Hindu lynch mobs, aided and abetted by the ruling Congress Party, orchestrated a mini pogrom of Sikhs following the 1984 assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguard.</p><p></p><p></p><p> It is out of question that a Sikh gurudwara could ever be erected next to Gandhi's residence, where she was assassinated, against the will of the majority Hindu population. And Indian Muslims have yet not been allowed to rebuild the mosque that Hindus led a national march to tear down with their bare hands in 1991—not even as recompense for the bloodletting they visited upon Muslims following the mosque razing.</p><p></p><p></p><p> The point is not to pick on any country. The point is that it is not easy, even for liberal democracies, to rein in the tyranny of the majority. That in America no majority can forcibly evict the imam and his family against his will is not nothing. Nor is the fact that if anyone tried to, they would have to contend with the full force of the law, in contrast to India where the perpetrators of the Sikh and Muslim massacres have still not been brought to justice. No people anywhere has yet found a way to rationally examine its hatreds before venting them. But at least America's commitment to property rights and religious liberties runs deep enough that it can contain that hatred.</p><p></p><p></p><p> America, in short, represents not just how far humanity has yet to travel on the road to complete civility, but how far humanity has already traveled. For now, if the rest of the world just caught up with America, it would be a huge leap forward for the cause of toleration.</p><p></p><p></p><p> <em>Shikha Dalmia is a Reason Foundation senior analyst and a columnist at Forbes. This article</em> <em><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/12/america-mosque-controversy-politics-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html?boxes=opinionschannellatest" target="_blank"> originally appeared</a></em> <em>at Forbes.</em></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://reason.com/archives/2010/08/17/two-cheers-for-american-tolera" target="_blank">http://reason.com/archives/2010/08/17/two-cheers-for-american-tolera</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spnadmin, post: 131850, member: 35"] [COLOR=Blue]Here is another view on the subject of the mosque at Ground Zero. These are not my views. I am posting new content, as i do every day. The authorship and publication information can be found in the link to the original article.[/COLOR] The Ground Zero mosque controversy shows that America manages its hatreds better than others [URL="http://reason.com/people/shikha-dalmia"]Shikha Dalmia[/URL] | August 17, 2010 <script type="text/javascript" src="http://reason.com/media/js/audio-player.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> AudioPlayer.setup("/media/swf/player.swf", { width: 290 }); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> // <![CDATA[ $.getJSON('/outloudopinion/2010/08/17/two-cheers-for-american-tolera', function(data){ if(data.audio != null){ $("#outloudopinion").html('[URL="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/' + data.rss + '"][IMG]http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/media/icons/outloudopinionmic19x24.gif[/IMG][/URL] Listen to [URL="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/' + data.audio + '"]Audio Version[/URL] (MP3) ').show(); AudioPlayer.embed("outloudaudio", {soundFile: data.audio, titles:"Two Cheers for American Tolerance"}); }else{ //$("#outloudopinion").html('[URL="http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/' + data.rss + '"][IMG]http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/media/icons/outloudopinionmic19x24.gif[/IMG] Listen to Reason.com articles on OutloudOpinion[/URL] '); } }); // ]]> </script> <script type="text/javascript"> GA_googleFillSlot("inner1"); </script><script src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?correlator=1282093202318&output=json_html&callback=GA_googleSetAdContentsBySlotForSync&impl=s&prev_afc=8&a2ids=%2CPjxQ%2CN2yQ%2CBO3LQ%2C%2C%2CSziw%2CBOPVQ&cids=%2CLoleNs%2CK7Uu08%2CUf9hC0%2C%2C%2CNV2xiE%2CUZO4L0&pstok=IBlANom6pgAKAAoOCgoIxccPENvxldELEAAKDgoKCMntDRDP9tL2ChAACg4KCgit7k4QrYj2vxQQAAoFELKekQQKAAoOCgoIi-cSEKGM26sNEAAKDgoKCNWeThC9wbuyFBAA&client=ca-pub-4864286300355536&slotname=inner1&page_slots=popups%2Cheader1%2Cheader2%2Cleft1%2Cleft2%2Cleft3%2Cleft4%2Cleft5%2Cinner1&cookie=ID%3D52c735d19e57b76a%3AT%3D1282093267%3AS%3DALNI_Mbyd2Okw-UcL_hBkDrFBIlsil0qXw&cookie_enabled=1&ga_vid=102274211.1282093202&ga_sid=1282093202&ga_hid=1117617899&url=http%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2Farchives%2F2010%2F08%2F17%2Ftwo-cheers-for-american-tolera&lmt=1282093198&dt=1282093204499&cc=100&biw=1007&bih=399&ifi=9&adk=3825352754&u_tz=-240&u_his=1&u_java=true&u_h=600&u_w=1024&u_ah=570&u_aw=1024&u_cd=24&u_nplug=23&u_nmime=115&flash=10.1.53"></script> <ins style="width: 300px; height: 250px; border: 0pt none; display: inline-table; position: relative;"></ins>Sarah Palin has not only revealed herself to be linguistically challenged in "refudiating" the proposed "mosque" near Ground Zero, but also emotionally overwrought. "It stabs hearts," she [URL="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/07/18/sarah-palin-to-muslims-reject-ground-zero-mosque/"] tweeted[/URL] to her fellow mosque-bashers. But Palin notwithstanding, the way this country has comported itself during this controversy represents a damn fine moment for humanity. As a naturalized American, let me just say that if every country handled its hatreds as well as this one, this world wouldn't be a half-bad place to live in. <script>GA_googleCreateDomIframe('google_ads_div_inner1' ,'inner1');</script> It is painfully obvious that opposition to the Cordoba House, as this structure would be called, is motivated less by a desire to protect the memory of 9/11 victims and more by a knee-jerk suspicion of Muslims. If it were not, mosque-bashers wouldn't have so much difficulty processing some basic but crucial facts about the structure. The "mosque," for instance, is not really a mosque but an Islamic community center--complete with a swimming pool, auditorium, bookstores and restaurants—along the lines of the many YMCAs or Jewish community centers around the country. It will house a place of worship, but it won't blare muezzin calls summoning Muslims to pray five times a day, suggesting that it has a fairly relaxed attitude toward Quranic strictures. Nor will it be a Muslim-only place where members of other faiths are unwelcome; rather it will be open to anyone willing to pay its dues. Best (or worst) of all, it [URL="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-sledge/just-how-far-is-the-groun_b_660585.html"] won't be[/URL] "on" Ground Zero, but two blocks and a bend away at a spot not visible to World Trade Center visitors. None of this is preventing some opponents from bizarrely suggesting that the center represents a surreptitious attempt to glorify Islamic victory on American soil. But a victory statement communicated through esoteric means negates itself because such means signal weakness, not strength. What's more, it is one odd victory statement when its alleged authors are not claiming any moral high ground for their putative side. To the contrary, the couple, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf and his wife Daisy Khan, who are spearheading the center, have "refudiated" the 9/11 attacks in particular and Islamic terrorism in general. They have qualms about U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East that plenty of nonterrorist Americans would share. And they are Sufis, the moderate and mystical sect of Islam that is known for its refined music and art, not its militancy. In fact, by all auguries, they are modern and liberated Muslims who seem rather embarrassed by the hot-headed jihadis who speak for their religion. Their whole project was conceived in order to highlight the more benign, moderate side of Islam and build bridges with other faiths. [I]Newsweek[/I] Editor Fareed Zakaria is [URL="http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/06/the-real-ground-zero.html"]absolutely right[/URL] when he notes that, "if there is ever going to be a reformist movement in Islam, it is going to emerge from places like the proposed mosque." It is possible that the center is really an elaborate ruse for some sinister anti-American agenda—just as it is possible that America's next president could be a Manchurian candidate installed by the Chinese. But to suspect such an agenda in the face of massive evidence to the contrary testifies to just how deep-seated the suspicion against Muslims is in this country. But this is precisely why it is all the more remarkable that this resentment hasn't boiled over into active persecution—something that would hardly be possible any place else in the world. To be sure, this controversy has triggered a [URL="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/us/08mosque.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1"] backlash[/URL] against other proposed mosques in the country, with opponents holding protest rallies with dogs in tow to taunt Muslims who regard dogs as [I]napaak,[/I] or impure. And Republicans in some races have turned this controversy into something of a rallying cry to energize their base. But that's about the worst of it. On the other hand, to this country's enormous credit, New York City's Landmark Preservation Commission unanimously rejected demands that it subvert local zoning ordinances allowing houses of worship in the area "as a right" to scuttle the project. (Mosque opponents had wanted the commission to declare the existing Burlington Coat Factory on the site a landmark so that nothing else could be built there.) The losers have appealed the decision, although they know they have virtually [URL="http://www.slate.com/id/2262674"]no chance[/URL] of prevailing. Yet so far they have resorted not to violence but persuasion to convince the couple to go elsewhere. Even Palin's silly tweets are infused with a sweet civility, asking Muslims to reconsider as a gesture of goodwill toward their fellow Americans. Her request might be wrong-headed, but can anyone think of another country where a major national figure would resort to gentle cajoling to win over members of a vilified minority? Certainly not in continental Europe, which is busy enacting [URL="http://www.forbes.com/2010/05/19/burqa-france-clothing-women-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html"] burqa bans[/URL] for no other reason except that the majority wants to bend a minority to its norms. And it would never happen in India, my native country, where Hindu lynch mobs, aided and abetted by the ruling Congress Party, orchestrated a mini pogrom of Sikhs following the 1984 assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguard. It is out of question that a Sikh gurudwara could ever be erected next to Gandhi's residence, where she was assassinated, against the will of the majority Hindu population. And Indian Muslims have yet not been allowed to rebuild the mosque that Hindus led a national march to tear down with their bare hands in 1991—not even as recompense for the bloodletting they visited upon Muslims following the mosque razing. The point is not to pick on any country. The point is that it is not easy, even for liberal democracies, to rein in the tyranny of the majority. That in America no majority can forcibly evict the imam and his family against his will is not nothing. Nor is the fact that if anyone tried to, they would have to contend with the full force of the law, in contrast to India where the perpetrators of the Sikh and Muslim massacres have still not been brought to justice. No people anywhere has yet found a way to rationally examine its hatreds before venting them. But at least America's commitment to property rights and religious liberties runs deep enough that it can contain that hatred. America, in short, represents not just how far humanity has yet to travel on the road to complete civility, but how far humanity has already traveled. For now, if the rest of the world just caught up with America, it would be a huge leap forward for the cause of toleration. [I]Shikha Dalmia is a Reason Foundation senior analyst and a columnist at Forbes. This article[/I] [I][URL="http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/12/america-mosque-controversy-politics-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html?boxes=opinionschannellatest"] originally appeared[/URL][/I] [I]at Forbes.[/I] [url]http://reason.com/archives/2010/08/17/two-cheers-for-american-tolera[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Discussions
Interfaith Dialogues
2 Cheers For American Tolerance
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top