Recent content by fsf

Tejwant ji & Seeker9 ji, Thank you for your response! I can see a few possible responses to it, but (spoiler alert!) at the end of the day I was wrong. First, I could hold fast and say that the type of paradigm shift we see in science isn't present in Sikhi. While we certainly learn new...

No, science is a method that is necessarily fallible. Religious inquiry need not be fallible (though it can be). To the extent that the religious inquirer uses the scientific (ie prediction-making, falsifiable, methodologically and ontologically reviseable) method, then their inquiry can be a...

Hello, I'm an educator working on a PhD in philosophy. I realized that I know next to nothing about Sikhi, and wish to learn more for three disparate but (to my mind) equally important reasons: first, there are deep resonances between my own work on rationality and justification and Sikh...