Sign Up |  Live StatsLive Stats    Articles 35,344| Comments 159,770| Members 17,818, Newest mohindersingh| Online 261
Home Contact
 (Forgotten?): 
    Sikhism

   
                                                                     Your Banner Here!    

Of Berets and Turbans

Our Donation Goal : Why Donate? : Donate Today! : Donate Anonymously (ਗੁਪਤ) : Our Family of Supporters
Goal this month: 400 USD, Received: 35 USD (9%)
Please Donate...
Related Topics...
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbans are ok !! Gyani Jarnail Singh Sikh Youth 0 16-Apr-2010 17:57 PM
Nihang Turbans Hardip Singh Sanatan Sikhism 2 30-Oct-2009 04:47 AM
Let's Talk Turbans :) Narayanjot Kaur Sikh Youth 1 23-Sep-2009 10:26 AM
Turbans set for a comeback kds1980 Sikh News 0 20-Feb-2007 05:28 AM
women and turbans sarahkaur History of Sikhism 6 29-Jan-2005 18:23 PM


Tags
berets, turbans
Reply Post New Topic In This Forum Stay Connected to Sikhism, Click Here to Register Now!
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 18-Nov-2009, 01:35 AM
Aman Singh's Avatar Aman Singh Aman Singh is offline
 
Enrolled: Jun 1st, 2004
Location: Sikh Philosophy Network
Age: 36
Posts: 4,979
Aman Singh has disabled reputation
   
Adherent: Sikhi
Blog Entries: 4
Liked 3,648 Times in 1,728 Posts
   
Of Berets and Turbans

  Donate Today!   Email to Friend  Tell a Friend   Show Printable Version  Print   Contact sikhphilosophy.net Administraion for any Suggestions, Ideas, Feedback.  Feedback  

Register to Remove Advertisements
Elaine Donnelly at NRO goes overboard in castigating the Army for allowing a Sikh doctor (and potentially a Sikh dentist) to retain the beards and turbans their faith requires of them. Donnelly (whose work I usually admire) compares this dispensation to the Army's deliberately turning a blind eye to the blatant jihadism of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. The two are in no way comparable. The latter was an egregious dereliction of duty on the part of the authorities, while the former is merely bureaucratic nitpicking of the sort that Paul Fussell characterized so accurately as "chickenshit."
Donnelly should consider that the Sikhs have a long and distinguished history of military service in the British Indian Army. Sikh regiments were not only unfailingly loyal (once the British had conquered the Sikhs, a feat that required two wars between 1845 and 1849) but were usually in the forefront of the battle. Only the Gurkhas equal or exceed the military reputation of the Sikhs. Throughout their service to the Raj, which ended only with Indian independence, the Sikhs were allowed to retain their beards and distinctive headwear. It did not affect their performance in combat; rather, it was a mark of distinction, of regimental loyalty and unit cohesion--the intangible moral factors that lead to high combat effectiveness.


Unfortunately, the United States Army has a tin ear when it comes to such matters. Take, for example, a simple matter such as headgear. Up through the tenure of General Eric Shinseki as Army Chief of Staff, only elite units were permitted to wear a beret--a privilege earned in blood. The Army Rangers wore a black beret, the paratroopers of the 82nd and 101st airborne wore maroon, and the Special Forces wore the famous green beret. In an effort to "transform" the Army and make it more "expeditionary oriented," Shinseki directed all troops to begin wearing the black beret. That's right--we'll turn the Army into a lean, mean, fighting machine by making all the troops wear Monica Lewinski's hat. It was a fitting gesture for the Clinton era in military affairs. The Rangers, of course, were outraged--a black beret means something, just as the maroon beret and jump boots mean something to paratroops, and the green beret to the Special Forces. And now a bunch of fat, sloppy REMFs were wearing it and walking around with Ranger swagger. As for the paratroops and the Special Forces, well, they didn't want to be mistaken for Rangers, either. There was pretty close to a full blown headgear rebellion that was squelched only when the Army relented and allowed the Special Forces and Airborne to retain their distinctive colors. As for the poor Rangers, they were given a rather washed-out looking tan beret, and still haven't gotten over it.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/27543-of-berets-and-turbans.html
The point is seemingly minor matters such as headgear and footwear matter when it comes to morale, unit cohesion and combat effectiveness. These small marks of individuality, especially when earned, allows the soldier to gain pride in himself and his unit. It makes him part of a larger tradition, not just a cog in the Big Green Machine, and should be encouraged, not suppressed. A truly clever Army would not try to make Sikhs shave their beards and discard their turbans, but would go so far as make them special marks of distinction. Tap into the Sikh community, form Sikh platoons, companies and battalions wearing the traditional Sikh uniform. I wager the Sikhs will serve the United States with the same zeal and loyalty they showed to the British Raj.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=27543


And while we are on that subject, I understand that there are a great many under-employed Gurkha soldiers now that the British army is cutting back once again. An offer of citizenship in return for service might get a very favorable response from some of the best soldiers in the world.




 
Do share your immediate thoughts or reactions on this issue? We value your views! Login Now! or Sign Up Today! to share your views with us.. Gurfateh!
Reply With Quote
The following member appreciates Aman Singh Ji for the above message.
Sponsored Links
   Click Here to Donate Now!

Support Us!
Become a Promoter!
Gurfateh ji, you can become a SPN Promoter by Donating as little as $10 each month. With limited resources & high operational costs, your donations make it possible for us to deliver a quality website and spread the teachings of the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, to serve & uplift humanity. Every contribution counts. Donate Generously. Gurfateh!
ReplyPost New Topic In This Forum Stay Connected to Sikhism, Click Here to Register Now!

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Tools Search
Search:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Gurbani Jukebox
Listen to Gurbani while surfing SPN!
» Active Discussions
sikhism On a Scale of Most...
Today 21:42 PM
30 Replies, 1,246 Views
sikhism I became victim by...
Today 19:50 PM
0 Replies, 16 Views
sikhism How important is Matha...
By Ishna
Today 19:05 PM
58 Replies, 1,005 Views
sikhism Sikh Diamonds Video...
Today 17:42 PM
5 Replies, 101 Views
sikhism Who is "Mohan"?
By Chinu
Today 17:07 PM
17 Replies, 257 Views
sikhism Sikh Books downloads
Today 15:39 PM
2 Replies, 45 Views
sikhism ਨਾਮਾ
Today 11:06 AM
0 Replies, 29 Views
sikhism Salok Sheikh Farid ji...
Today 09:35 AM
0 Replies, 31 Views
sikhism In Punjab, three farmers...
Today 05:36 AM
0 Replies, 37 Views
sikhism Supernatural Sikhs, what...
Today 03:45 AM
19 Replies, 401 Views
sikhism Sukhmani Sahib Astpadi...
Yesterday 22:57 PM
0 Replies, 38 Views
Herman Hesse,...
Yesterday 14:06 PM
12 Replies, 214 Views
Do You Think You Are...
Yesterday 09:59 AM
94 Replies, 8,252 Views
Sukhmani Sahib Astpadi...
Yesterday 05:18 AM
0 Replies, 56 Views
Truth Stranger Than...
Yesterday 02:52 AM
0 Replies, 62 Views
» Books You Should Read...
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT +6.5. The time now is 22:27 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2 Copyright © 2004-12, All Rights Reserved. Sikh Philosophy Network


Page generated in 0.32931 seconds with 29 queries