• Welcome to all New Sikh Philosophy Network Forums!
    Explore Sikh Sikhi Sikhism...
    Sign up Log in

Trump's continuous onslaught on India

Dalvinder Singh Grewal

Writer
Historian
SPNer
Jan 3, 2010
1,639
433
80
Trump has been continuously targeting India. The latest is an increase of tariffs to 50%, which obviously appears to subdue India to make it accept certain trade negotiations, which India can accept only at its peril, especially the opening of agriculture-related fields so that the USA could dump its produce into India.
Increasing pressure on India before US negotiators are expected to reach India on August 25, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday doubled the tariffs on India to 50 percent, but there is a 21-day window before the additional tariff of 25 percent comes into effect, offering India a window to strike a trade deal.
A White House statement said that the US will impose an “additional 25 percent ad valorem duty” above the 25 percent reciprocal tariffs announced on August 1 to “deal with the national emergency stemming from Russia’s actions in Ukraine.” This tariff is deemed necessary and appropriate due to India’s “direct or indirect import of Russian Federation oil,” which the president judges will more effectively address the national emergency, the executive order said.
The additional tariffs dramatically raise pressure on India, as most of its competitors, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and now China, are not at lower tariffs. However, exporters said that US tariff-related uncertainty is already disrupting trade and that Indian exporters have grown wary of exporting to the US. About half of India’s total exports of $80 billion are, however, in the exemption list that includes products such as pharma and electronics goods.
While the fresh order takes the total US tariffs to their highest on any country globally, it also offers a fresh window for discussion. The Indian Express had reported on Saturday that key economic ministries have been asked for inputs to sweeten the US trade deal stuck on India’s resistance to US demand for access in the Indian agri market.

“This 25 percent ad valorem duty will be effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time 21 days after the date of the order. There are exceptions for goods that were loaded onto a vessel and in transit before this effective date and are entered for consumption or withdrawn from the warehouse for consumption before 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on September 17, 2025,” the order read.

In actuality, China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India (just under 2 million a day) and Turkey. The US had agreed to lower tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent from 145 per cent in May. The executive order does not make a mention of China, but instead stipulates a mechanism wherein the US Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with other senior officials, “will monitor if any other country (beyond India) is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil and recommend further action”.
Indian exporters are in a fix, scrambling to retain access to the US — their most valuable export market, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of India’s total outbound shipments. The newly announced duties target several of India's top-performing export sectors, like auto components, steel, aluminum, smartphones, gems and jewellery. Pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and critical minerals, however, have been excluded.
The Indian government has said that it will safegauard its national and economic interests. Indian officials have indicated that the US is unwilling to negotiate sectoral tariffs — such as those on steel and automobiles — which have already impacted nearly $5 billion worth of Indian exports. Evan A. Feigenbaum, Vice President for Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said on Monday that US-India relations may now become a political football, especially in New Delhi. He warned that the core understandings that enabled closer ties may be at serious risk, as New Delhi had largely assumed Washington would take political risks to strengthen the relationship — something Trump has not done and clearly will not do.

The split in relations is further underscored by Trump’s effusive praise for Islamabad and recent engagement with Pakistan’s army and government — developments that raise obvious concerns in New Delhi. “The United States was roiled by India’s ties to Iran, Myanmar, and later Russia. Trump and his administration are now moving to sanction and tariff India over its oil trade with Russia. This significantly shifts the bar for bilateral relations,” he said. The sweeping measure, aimed at correcting what Trump described as “obnoxious” non-tariff barriers, is being seen as both a protectionist move and a pointed diplomatic signal.
 

Dalvinder Singh Grewal

Writer
Historian
SPNer
Jan 3, 2010
1,639
433
80
ਟਰੰਪ ਦੀਆਂ ਬੇਹੁਰਮਤੀਆਂ

ਡਾ: ਦਲਵਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਗ੍ਰੇਵਾਲ



ਟਰੰਪ ਲਗਾਤਾਰ ਭਾਰਤ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਜ ਕੱਲ਼ ਲਗਾਤਾਰ ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨਾ ਬਣਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ਕਰਾਂ (ਟੈਰਿਫ) ਵਿੱਚ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ 25% ਤੇ ਹੁਣ ਤਾਜ਼ਾ 50% ਦਾ ਵਾਧਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਉਹ ਭਾਰਤ ਨੂੰ ਝੁਕਾਉਣ ਲਈ ਅਪਣੀ ਆਰਥਿਕਤਾ ਨੂੰ ਹਥਿਆਰ ਵਜੋਂ ਵਰਤ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ਸਪੱਸ਼ਟ ਤੌਰ 'ਤੇ ਉਹ ਭਾਰਤ ਨੂੰ ਅਪਣੀਆਂ ਸ਼ਰਤਾਂ ਤੇ ਵਪਾਰਕ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ ਨੂੰ ਸਵੀਕਾਰ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਮਜਬੂਰ ਕਰਦਾ ਜਾਪਦਾ ਹੈ, ਜਿਸ ਨੂੰ ਭਾਰਤ ਸਿਰਫ ਆਪਣੇ ਜੋਖਮ' ਤੇ ਹੀ ਸਵੀਕਾਰ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ। ਉਹ ਚਾਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਭਾਰਤ ਖੇਤੀਬਾੜੀ, ਪਸ਼ੂਪਾਲਣ, ਮੱਛੀ ਪਾਲਣ ਅਤ ਪੋਲਟਰੀ ਫਾਰਮਿੰਗ ਨਾਲ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਖੇਤਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਅਮਰੀਕੀ ਮੰਡੀਆਂ ਲਈ ਖੋਲ੍ਹੇ ਤਾਂ ਜੋ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਆਪਣੀ ਵਾਧੂ ਪੈਦਾਵਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੁੱਟ ਸਕੇ।ਅਮਰੀਕੀ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ ਕਰਨ ਕਰਕੇ ਇਹ ਨਵੀਂ ਕਰ ਨੀਤੀ 25 ਅਗਸਤ ਨੂੰ ਲਾਗੂ ਕਰਨ ਦਾ ਐਲਾਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆਂ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਕਿ ਭਾਰਤ ਉਤੇ ਵਪਾਰ ਸਮਝੌਤੇ ਦੌਰਾਨ ਦਬਾਅ ਬਣਿਆ ਰਹੇ।

ਵ੍ਹਾਈਟ ਹਾਊਸ ਦੇ ਬਿਆਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਿਹਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ "ਯੂਕ੍ਰੇਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਰੂਸ ਦੀਆਂ ਕਾਰਵਾਈਆਂ ਤੋਂ ਪੈਦਾ ਹੋਈ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ ਐਮਰਜੈਂਸੀ ਨਾਲ ਨਜਿੱਠਣ" ਲਈ 1 ਅਗਸਤ ਨੂੰ ਐਲਾਨੇ ਗਏ 25 ਪ੍ਰਤੀਸ਼ਤ ਪਰਸਪਰ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਤੋਂ ਉੱਪਰ "ਵਾਧੂ 25 ਪ੍ਰਤੀਸ਼ਤ ਐਡ ਵੈਲੋਰਮ ਡਿਊਟੀ" ਲਗਾਏਗਾ। ਕਾਰਜਕਾਰੀ ਆਦੇਸ਼ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਿਹਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ "ਰੂਸੀ ਸੰਘ ਦੇ ਤੇਲ ਦੇ ਸਿੱਧੇ ਜਾਂ ਅਸਿੱਧੇ ਆਯਾਤ" ਕਾਰਨ ਜ਼ਰੂਰੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਚਿਤ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਜਿਸ ਨਾਲ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਪਤੀ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ ਐਮਰਜੈਂਸੀ ਨੂੰ ਵਧੇਰੇ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਸ਼ਾਲੀ ਢੰਗ ਨਾਲ ਹੱਲ ਕਰਨਗੇ।ਵਾਧੂ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਨਾਟਕੀ ਢੰਗ ਨਾਲ ਭਾਰਤ ਉੱਤੇ ਦਬਾਅ ਵਧਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ, ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਇਸ ਦੇ ਜ਼ਿਆਦਾਤਰ ਪ੍ਰਤੀਯੋਗੀ, ਜਿਵੇਂ ਕਿ ਵੀਅਤਨਾਮ, ਬੰਗਲਾਦੇਸ਼ ਅਤੇ ਹੁਣ ਚੀਨ, ਘੱਟ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਉੱਤੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਹਨ। ਹਾਲਾਂਕਿ, ਬਰਾਮਦਕਾਰਾਂ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਅਮਰੀਕੀ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਨਾਲ ਸਬੰਧਤ ਅਨਿਸ਼ਚਿਤਤਾ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਹੀ ਵਪਾਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਿਘਨ ਪਾ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਬਰਾਮਦਕਾਰ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਨੂੰ ਨਿਰਯਾਤ ਕਰਨ ਤੋਂ ਸਾਵਧਾਨ ਹੋ ਗਏ ਹਨ। ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ ਕੁੱਲ 80 ਬਿਲੀਅਨ ਡਾਲਰ ਦੇ ਨਿਰਯਾਤ ਦਾ ਲਗਭਗ ਅੱਧਾ ਹਿੱਸਾ, ਹਾਲਾਂਕਿ, ਛੋਟ ਸੂਚੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੈ ਜਿਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਫਾਰਮਾ ਅਤੇ ਇਲੈਕਟ੍ਰੌਨਿਕਸ ਸਮਾਨ ਵਰਗੇ ਉਤਪਾਦ ਸ਼ਾਮਲ ਹਨ।

ਇਹ ਤਾਜ਼ਾ ਆਦੇਸ਼ ਵਿਸ਼ਵ ਪੱਧਰ 'ਤੇ ਕਿਸੇ ਵੀ ਦੇਸ਼' ਤੇ ਕੁੱਲ ਅਮਰੀਕੀ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਨੂੰ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਉੱਚੇ ਪੱਧਰ 'ਤੇ ਲੈ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਇਸ ਲਈ ਵਿਸ਼ਵ ਪੱਧਰੀ ਚਰਚਾ ਵੀ ਚਾਲੂ ਹੋ ਗਈ ਹੈ । ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਮੁੱਖ ਆਰਥਿਕ ਮੰਤਰਾਲਿਆਂ ਨੇ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਖੇਤੀਬਾੜੀ ਬਾਜ਼ਾਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਮਰੀਕੀ ਸਪਲਾਈ ਹੋ ਜਾਣ ਦੇ ਖਤਰੇ ਦਾ ਗੰਭੀਰ ਅੀਧਐਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਇਹ ਸਾਹਮਣੇ ਆਇਆ ਹ ੈਕਿ ਕਿਸਾਨੀ ਵਟਗ ਹੀ ਨਹੀਨ ਸਮੁੱਚੇ ਦੇਸ਼ ਨੂੰ ਨੀਵਾਣ ਵੱਲ ਲੈ ਜਾਏਗਾ ਇਸ ਲਈ ਖਤਰਨਾਕ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਨਾਲ ਮਾਰੂ ਵੀ ਸਿ!ਧ ਹੋ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ।

ਇਸ ਨਵੇਂ ਕਾਰਜਕਾਰੀ ਆਦੇਸ਼ ਵਿੱਚ ਚੀਨ ਦਾ ਜ਼ਿਕਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ, ਬਲਕਿ ਇਸ ਦੀ ਬਜਾਏ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਧੀ ਨਿਰਧਾਰਤ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ ਹੈ ਜਿਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਮਰੀਕੀ ਵਣਜ ਸਕੱਤਰ, ਹੋਰ ਸੀਨੀਅਰ ਅਧਿਕਾਰੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਤਾਲਮੇਲ ਨਾਲ, "ਨਿਗਰਾਨੀ ਕਰੇਗਾ ਕਿ ਕੀ ਕੋਈ ਹੋਰ ਦੇਸ਼ (ਭਾਰਤ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਹਰ) ਸਿੱਧੇ ਜਾਂ ਅਸਿੱਧੇ ਤੌਰ 'ਤੇ ਰੂਸੀ ਸੰਘ ਦੇ ਤੇਲ ਦੀ ਦਰਾਮਦ ਕਰ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਅਗਲੇਰੀ ਕਾਰਵਾਈ ਦੀ ਸਿਫਾਰਸ਼ ਕਰੇਗਾ। ਅਸਲ ਵਿੱਚ, ਚੀਨ ਲਗਭਗ 2 ਮਿਲੀਅਨ ਬੈਰਲ ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਦਿਨ, ਰੂਸੀ ਤੇਲ ਦਾ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਖਰੀਦਦਾਰ ਹੈ, ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਭਾਰਤ (ਸਿਰਫ 2 ਮਿਲੀਅਨ ਪ੍ਰਤੀ ਦਿਨ) ਅਤੇ ਤੁਰਕੀ ਆਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ। ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਨੇ ਮਈ 'ਚ ਚੀਨੀ ਵਸਤਾਂ' ਤੇ ਟੈਰਿਫ 145 ਫੀਸਦੀ ਤੋਂ ਘਟਾ ਕੇ 30 ਫੀਸਦੀ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਸਹਿਮਤੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਸੀ।

ਭਾਰਤੀ ਬਰਾਮਦਕਾਰ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਤੱਕ ਪਹੁੰਚ ਬਣਾਈ ਰੱਖਣ ਲਈ ਸੰਘਰਸ਼ ਕਰ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ-ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਕੀਮਤੀ ਨਿਰਯਾਤ ਬਾਜ਼ਾਰ ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ ਕੁੱਲ ਸਮੁੰਦਰ ਜ਼ਰੀਏ ਨਿਰਯਾਤ ਦਾ ਲਗਭਗ 20 ਪ੍ਰਤੀਸ਼ਤ ਬਣਦਾ ਹੈ। ਨਵੀਆਂ ਐਲਾਨੀਆਂ ਗਈਆਂ ਡਿਊਟੀ ਦਰਾਂ ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ ਕਈ ਚੋਟੀ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਲੇ ਨਿਰਯਾਤ ਖੇਤਰਾਂ, ਜਿਵੇਂ ਕਿ ਆਟੋ ਪੁਰਜ਼ਿਆਂ, ਸਟੀਲ, ਅਲਮੀਨੀਅਮ, ਸਮਾਰਟਫੋਨ, ਰਤਨ ਅਤੇ ਗਹਿਣਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਵੀ ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨਾ ਬਣਾਉਂਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਹਾਲਾਂਕਿ, ਫਾਰਮਾਸਿਊਟੀਕਲ, ਸੈਮੀਕੰਡਕਟਰ ਅਤੇ ਮਹੱਤਵਪੂਰਨ ਖਣਿਜਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਾਹਰ ਰੱਖਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ।

ਭਾਰਤ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਆਪਣੇ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ ਅਤੇ ਆਰਥਿਕ ਹਿੱਤਾਂ ਦੀ ਰਾਖੀ ਕਰੇਗੀ। ਭਾਰਤੀ ਅਧਿਕਾਰੀਆਂ ਨੇ ਸੰਕੇਤ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਸਟੀਲ ਅਤੇ ਆਟੋਮੋਬਾਈਲਜ਼ ਵਰਗੇ ਟੈਰਿਫ 'ਤੇ ਗੱਲਬਾਤ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਤਿਆਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ-ਜਿਸ ਨਾਲ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਹੀ ਲਗਭਗ 5 ਅਰਬ ਡਾਲਰ ਦੇ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਨਿਰਯਾਤ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਿਤ ਹੋਏ ਹਨ। ਕਾਰਨੇਗੀ ਐਂਡੋਮੈਂਟ ਫਾਰ ਇੰਟਰਨੈਸ਼ਨਲ ਪੀਸ ਦੇ ਵਾਈਸ ਪ੍ਰੈਜ਼ੀਡੈਂਟ ਫਾਰ ਸਟੱਡੀਜ਼ ਇਵਾਨ ਏ. ਫੀਗੇਨਬੌਮ ਨੇ ਸੋਮਵਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ-ਭਾਰਤ ਸਬੰਧ ਖ਼ਾਸਕਰ ਨਵੀਂ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੁਣ ਸਿਆਸੀ ਫੁੱਟਬਾਲ ਬਣ ਸਕਦੇ ਹਨ, । ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਚੇਤਾਵਨੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਨਜ਼ਦੀਕੀ ਸਬੰਧਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਮਰੱਥ ਬਣਾਉਣ ਵਾਲੀ ਮੁੱਖ ਸਮਝ ਗੰਭੀਰ ਜੋਖਮ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋ ਸਕਦੀ ਹੈ, ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਨਵੀਂ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਨੇ ਵੱਡੇ ਪੱਧਰ 'ਤੇ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਵਾਸ਼ਿੰਗਟਨ ਸਬੰਧਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਮਜ਼ਬੂਤ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਰਾਜਨੀਤਿਕ ਜੋਖਮ ਚੁੱਕੇਗਾ-ਜੋ ਕਿ ਟਰੰਪ ਨੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਸਪੱਸ਼ਟ ਤੌਰ' ਤੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰੇਗਾ। ਪ੍ਰਧਾਨ ਮੰਤਰੀ ਮੋਦੀ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਸਪਸ਼ਟ ਸ਼ਬਦਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਉਸ ਅਪਣੇ ਅਸੂਲਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਕਿਸਾਨਾਂ, ਮਛੂਆਰਿਆਂ ਅਤੇ ਪਸ਼ੂਪਾਲਣ ਦੇ ਹਿਤਾਂ ਵਿਰੁਧ ਕੋਈ ਸਮਝੌਤਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਨਗੇ।

ਸਬੰਧਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਫੁੱਟ ਨੂੰ ਟਰੰਪ ਵੱਲੋਂ ਇਸਲਾਮਾਬਾਦ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰਸ਼ੰਸਾ ਅਤੇ ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਦੀ ਫੌਜ ਅਤੇ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਨਾਲ ਹਾਲ ਹੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋਏ ਰੁਝੇਵਿਆਂ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਦਰਸਾਇਆ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ-ਜੋ ਨਵੀਂ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਚਿੰਤਾਵਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਾਫ ਤੌਰ ਤੇ ਵਧਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ। "ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਜ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਇਰਾਨ, ਮਿਆਂਮਾਰ ਅਤੇ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਰੂਸ ਨਾਲ ਭਾਰਤ ਦੇ ਸਬੰਧਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਖੁਸ਼ ਨਹੀਂ। ਟਰੰਪ ਅਤੇ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਸ਼ਾਸਨ ਹੁਣ ਰੂਸ ਨਾਲ ਤੇਲ ਵਪਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਲੈ ਕੇ ਭਾਰਤ 'ਤੇ ਪਾਬੰਦੀਆਂ ਅਤੇ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਲਗਾਉਣ ਵੱਲ ਵiਧਆ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਨਾਲ ਭਾਰਤ-ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਵਿਚਲੇ ਦੁਵੱਲੇ ਸਬੰਧਾਂ ਦੇ ਪੱਧਰ ਤੇ ਮਹੱਤਵਪੂਰਨ ਅਸਰ ਪੈ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ।

ਟ੍ਰੰਪ ਦੀ ਬੇਹਰਮਤੀਆਂ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਹੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਬਲਕਿ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਹਰ ਵੱਡੇ ਦੇਸ਼ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁਧ ਹਨ। ਉਸ ਨੇ ਰੂਸ ਵਿਰਿਹਾ।ਰੁਧ ਯੁਕਰੇਨ ਨੂੰ ਲਗਾਤਾਰ ਮਾਇਕ ਅਤੇ ਜੰਗੀ ਹਥਿਆਰ ਦੇ ਕੇ ਤੇ ਰੂਸ ਅਤੇ ਭਾਰਤ ਉਤੇ ਟੈਰਿਫ ਅਤੇ ਪਾਬੰਦੀਆਂ ਲਗਾ ਕੇ, ਇਜ਼ਰਾਈਲ ਨੂੰ ਹਮਾਸ, ਇਰਾਨ, ਸੀਰੀਆ ਅਤੇ ਯਮਨ ਨੂੰ ਖਤਮ ਕਰਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਦਦ ਦੇ ਕੇ; ਪਾਕਿਸਤਾਨ ਨੂੰ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਲਗਾਤਾਰ ਹੱਲਾਸ਼ੇਰੀ, ਹਥਿਆਰ, ਸਹੂਲਤਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਫੰਡ ਮੁਹਈਆ ਕਰਵਾ ਕੇ ੳਤੇ ਵਿਸ਼ਵ ਵਿੱਚ ਸ਼ਾਂਤੀ ਦਾ ਰੌਲਾ ਪਾ ਕੇ ਅਸ਼ਾਂਤੀ ਵਧਾਈ ਹੈ ਉਸ ਲਈ ਤਾਂ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਅਪਣੇ ਦੇਸ਼ ਵਾਸੀ ਵੀ ਖਫਾ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਉਸਦਾ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਨਜ਼ਦੀਕੀ ਆਦਮੀ ਉਸਦੇ ਵਿਰੁਧ ਹੋ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ। ਟ੍ਰੰਪ ਕੋਈ ਇਡੀ ਵੱਡੀ ਤੋਪ ਨਹੀਂ ਜੋ ਇੱਕ ਗੋਲੇ ਨਾਲ ਸੱਭ ਨੂੰ ਮਾਰ ਦੇਵੇਗੀ। ਉਸ ਦੇ ਤਾਂ ਰਾਖਵੇਂ ਗੋਲੇ ਵੀ ਠੁੱਸ ਹੋ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ। ਇੱਕ ਅਮਰੀਕਨ ਨੇ ਠੀਕ ਹੀ ਕਿਹਾ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਕਦਰਾਂ ਕਰੇ ਵਿਸ਼ਵ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੰਬਿਆਂ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਸੀ ਹੁਣ ਉਹ ਸਭ ਕਦਰਾਂ ਕੀਮਤਾਂ ਮਿੱਟੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਿਲਾ ਦਿਤੀਆਂ ਗਈਆਂ ਹਨ ਤੇ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਹੁਣ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿਚ ਕੌਡੀ ਬਰਾਬਰ ਵੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ।

ਟਰੰਪ ਦੀ ਦਾਦਾਗੀਰੀ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁਧ ਭਾਰਤੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਜੁਟ ਜਾਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਅੱਜ ਤੋਂ ਹੀ ਕੋਕਾ ਕੋਲਾ, ਫੈਂਟਾ, ਥੰਮਸਅੱਪ, ਪੈਪਸੀ, ਮਕਡਾਨਲਡ, ਡੋਮੀਨੋ ਪੀਜ਼ਾ, ਬਰਗਰ ਕਿੰਗ, ਸਬਵੇ, ਪੀਜ਼ਾ ਹੱਟ ਆਦਿ ਦਾ ਬਾਈਕਾਟ ਕਰ ਦੇਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ।ਅਮਰੀਕਨ ਕਾਰਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਮੋਟਰ ਸਾਈਕਲਾਂ ਵੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਖਰੀਦਣੀਆਂ ਚਾਹੀਦੀਆਂ। ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਆਵਾਜ਼ ਅਤ ਸਮੁੱਚੀ ਵਿਰੋਧਤਾ ਟਰੰਪ ਤੱਕ ਨੂੰ ਵੀ ਹਿਲਾ ਸਕਦੀ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਸਿੱਧੇ ਰਸਤੇ ਪਾ ਸਕਦੀ ਹੈ
 

Dalvinder Singh Grewal

Writer
Historian
SPNer
Jan 3, 2010
1,639
433
80
India plans digital action against the USA by taking action against Amazon, Google, and other digital means that are earning money from India through advertisement and are not paying due taxes. All the money earned through the operations, including advertisement, will now be made taxable.
 

Dalvinder Singh Grewal

Writer
Historian
SPNer
Jan 3, 2010
1,639
433
80
One must wonder whether Mr. Modi's efforts to wine and dine the Big Two of today's world were seen as a sign of weakness rather than a proffered arm of friendship, points out R Jagannathan.
1755578910406.png

IMAGE: Prime Minister Narendra Modi and United States President Donald Trump hug as they meet at the White House, February 13, 2025. Photograph: ANI Photo

For a country that is soon to overtake Japan to become the world's fourth-largest economy, and possibly the third before the end of the decade, India punches below its weight in terms of diplomacy. While Prime Minister Narendra Modi is routinely seen as a rising global leader, he has to get more done through active diplomacy. A visible personal rapport with global leaders is not a solid enough basis for conducting the kind of hard-nosed diplomacy that delivers net gains for the country. We saw this recently when, despite a seemingly close relationship with Donald Trump, he managed to deeply embarrass India by claiming that the United States had mediated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after Operation Sindoor. Worse, we are now stuck with 25 percent tariffs on exports to the US and have been warned of further 25 percent tariffs over our ties with long-time friend Russia. Earlier, after Mr. Modi personally hosted China's Xi Jinping in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, we ended up with the Galwan clashes and the remilitarization of the India-China border. Worse, during Operation Sindoor, China fully supported Pakistan in targeting Indian air and other assets with its weapons and intelligence. In fact, one must wonder whether Mr. Modi's efforts to wine and dine the Big Two of today's world were seen as a sign of weakness rather than a proffered arm of friendship. His trademark hugs may have played well with an Indian audience, but it's unclear how world leaders interpreted them. We need to move from demonstrative style to hard substance, both in diplomacy and action. Reducing our dependence on foreign military supplies by focusing on indigenous supply chains and technology is a no-brainer. What we must ponder is whether our diplomacy so far has been more reactive than proactive. We can't just be responding to the wars and growing instability around us with mere statements. We have to make things happen and mitigate the threats, both to ourselves and the world. Our diplomacy needs an activist role, even if it is behind the scenes
1755579131562.png
IMAGE: Modi with Russia's President Vladimir Putin, left, and China's President Xi Jinping, right, at a meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan, June 28, 2019. Photograph: Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Kremlin/Reuters To list just some of the challenges, there is pressure building up for us to reduce our economic and military ties to Russia. In West Asia, as Israel gets more and more isolated from Western opinion due to its actions in Gaza, France and some European Union members have recognized Palestine, and the United Kingdom may follow suit, and India will be under pressure to do something about Palestine. It will be difficult to maintain our close strategic partnerships with Israel, especially if domestic Muslim opinion—never very comfortable with the Modi government—starts piling on the pressure through opposition parties. It is not in India's interest to let either Russia or Israel be undermined too much or go down in flames. While the US will probably stand by Israel, domestic opinion in the US and Europe—especially on the political Left—is rapidly turning anti-Israel. And most of Europe and the US would not mind Russia's effective demise as a major power. In our own neighborhood, we already have a Pakistan-China axis to contend with but may soon have to add Bangladesh to the list of potential hostile powers. The fact that India has not been able to protect Hindus in Bangladesh or even seal its borders against infiltrators says a lot. One of Mr. Modi's statements that did not age well is that 'This is not the era of war.'Soon after he said this in the context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, we ended up with another West Asian war that is still ongoing and our own mini-war with Pakistan. Even in Southeast Asia, two ASEAN members, Cambodia and Thailand, were recently involved in a deadly border skirmish. One may not want war, but this doesn't quite look like an age of peace either, with every country now seeking to boost its defense capabilities. The fact that our own defense exports are booming should tell us that the scent of war is rising everywhere—after the collapse of the old world order and the rise of China. India needs to do more to help end wars while making sure that our own strategic interests are protected. It is not in our interest to see Russia diminished, for that would push it deeper into China's hands and worsen our own strategic interests.We must take an active part in defusing the Ukraine war by using people like National Security Advisor Ajit Doval (and some others, who can remain unnamed) to discuss possible ways to end the war.This cannot happen without the EU and Russia coming to some sort of agreement on how Ukraine is to be divided or governed in the future.Russia is a European power, and Europe should not have to think of it as a perpetual enemy, especially when Russia is one of the world's biggest sources of energy and critical minerals. We must ask whether Ukraine should become a neutral, non-EU/non-NATO state—as Finland was during the Cold War. Can Russia be allowed to keep troops in the Donbas region of Ukraine, which it has already annexed, as part of a diplomatic solution? In West Asia, world opinion is moving towards a two-state solution, but that will not work. A fully independent Gaza could quite easily fall into the arms of Hamas and, as a legitimate state, will be able to build up its own independent military might in addition to hosting terror assets.Solutions short of independence may have to be considered.Should Gaza be a protectorate of Israel along with one neighbouring power (Jordan?), with independence in most areas barring foreign policy and defence?The India-Bhutan relationship offers one kind of solution.India must think beyond just defence capabilities, weaving in diplomacy that enables new alliances to emerge. India could facilitate—without being overconfident of its ability to influence this shift—a slow détente between Russia and Germany (and, indirectly, the EU) to make it possible for the former to reduce its dependence on China. If Pakistan could facilitate a US-China rapprochement in the 1970s, why can't India do the same between Europe and Russia? Today, Germany and Japan are not led by men like Hitler and Hideki Tojo. If anything, that Axis of Potential Evil is led by China's Xi Jinping, Iran's ayatollahs, Pakistan's military generals, and Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is dreaming of heading the next Islamic caliphate. Threats to world peace usually come from powers that want big changes in the status quo, and this does not include other rising powers like India, Indonesia, Brazil, or South Africa. None of these countries have overambitious territorial claims or a grab-what-you-can attitude.
1755579179162.png
IMAGE: Modi and Philippines President Bongbong Marcos witness the exchange of MoUs between India and the Philippines at Hyderabad House in New Delhi, August 5, 2025. Photograph: Rahul Singh/ANI PhotoIndia must raise its diplomatic game from passive to active, both to create a new power balance and to protect its own strategic interests. Rediff
 

Dalvinder Singh Grewal

Writer
Historian
SPNer
Jan 3, 2010
1,639
433
80
Sikhs and Muslims react sharply to ‘No beards; trimming hair’ orders by US Secretary of Defence Hegseth
1759720888649.png

Hegeseth addresses Generals
1759720849513.png

The addresses by Trump and Hegseth, after top military brass were summoned from commands around the world, came as Trump has ordered U.S. troops into a growing number of cities to support deportations and suppress crime.

On September 30, 2025 U.S. Military Secretary Hegseth announced 10 new directives, including implementing physical fitness standards, bringing combat arms positions up to the "highest male standard" and ordering troops to shave their beards and cut their hair short. While generals and admirals at the meeting wouldn't be forced to take their own physical fitness test, every member of the joint force would be required to take a physical fitness test twice a year and meet height and weight standards." ‘We’re not talking hot yoga and stretching," Hegseth added.

‘No more beards’: Hegseth gives military branches 60 days to end shaving waivers for almost all US troops. The Pentagon will cease granting permanent medical shaving exemptions and end most religious exemptions that have allowed some U.S. military troops to wear beards in uniform in recent years, according to a Tuesday memorandum from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Hegseth issued the memo after lambasting a military culture that has allowed thousands of troops to sport beards in the last 15 years during his 45-minute speech Tuesday before hundreds of generals, admirals and senior enlisted troops at Marine Corps Base Quantico, in Virginia. The memo gives the Pentagon’s military branches 60 days to construct plans for implementing the new grooming policies and about 90 days to enforce them.

Hegseth wrote in his memo that the new standards were “not about appearance,” but instead “about survivability, interoperability, and mission execution” — including the need to wear properly-sealed protective masks in some environments — he took aim at service members’ appearance in his Tuesday speech, calling out “fat troops” and those with beards. “No more beards,” Hegseth said during the presentation, which he ordered top officers and their enlisted advisers from around the world to attend. “The era of rampant and ridiculous shaving profiles is done.

Hegseth has railed against bearded troops for months and ordered a military-wide review of grooming standards in March. The Army and Marine Corps tightened rules on medical shaving waivers shortly after that order. The memo issued Tuesday ends virtually all religious exemptions that have allowed some service members to wear beards in recent years, including Sikh, Norse Pagan and some Muslim troops. It instructs the Defense Department to return to pre-2010 standards, referring to the first year the Army granted an exemption to a Sikh soldier to wear a beard in uniform. The service began granting permanent religious accommodations to Sikh soldiers in 2017, and other troops have been granted religious beard waivers on a case-by-case basis since 2019. Under Hegseth’s new policy, “facial hair waivers are generally not authorized,” and those who have been granted an exemption will face “individualized reviews” and must provide documentation proving their “sincerity of the religious or sincerely held belief” to be considered for an accommodation. The policy also ends permanent shaving profiles for those who suffer from pseudofolliculitis barbae, or razor bumps. Current troops with razor-bump profiles can be granted shaving exemptions for up to 12 months, but they must also have a treatment plan. Those with permanent conditions will be considered for administrative separation, Hegseth wrote. Pseudofolliculitis barbae, caused by curly hairs growing back into the skin, disproportionately affect Black men and is associated with frequent shaving, according to a study by the Society of Federal Health Professionals. Army officials said in July they would help train soldiers suffering from the condition to shave properly. Hegseth said the new policy will bar military hopefuls from entering the ranks if they cannot meet his new grooming standards — including those diagnosed with pseudofolliculitis barbae. The memo also orders all service members to complete annual training to include a mask-fit test to ensure they can achieve a proper seal on a gas or firefighting mask, he wrote. Those who refuse to comply with Hegseth’s new shaving standards or fail mask-seal tests will not be allowed to deploy, and “repeated noncompliance may result in administrative separation,” according to the memo. Hegseth’s policy allows male soldiers to wear sideburns “above ear openings” and “neatly trimmed” moustaches which cannot “extend past the mouth corners or into a respirator seal zone.”

For communities like Sikhs, Orthodox Jews, and Muslims, who are religiously mandated to maintain unshorn hair, the ban forces a direct conflict between their faith and their military career. The Sikh Coalition, a prominent advocacy group, expressed deep concern, stating the policy could compel hundreds of devout soldiers to choose between their beliefs and serving their country. Historically, Sikh soldiers have only been able to serve with their articles of faith—including turbans and beards (kesh)—since 2010 through a system of individual, hard-won waivers, which were later formalised in 2017 to create a “strong presumption" in favour of religious requests. Sikh minorities in the US military voiced strong objections to defense secretary Pete Hegseth’s announcement mandating stricter grooming standards, including a ban on beards, long hair, and other personal expressions. “The Sikh Coalition, a group that has advocated for Sikhs in the military who want to wear visible signs of their faith, has issued a statement saying it is ‘angered and deeply concerned’ about Hegseth’s comments about grooming standards,” the organisation said. Critics, including civil rights groups and veterans, argue the policy is discriminatory and a massive rollback of religious freedom protections guaranteed by the First Amendment. They contend that the government has the burden of proving that allowing a beard substantially harms military readiness, a standard that had previously favoured accommodation.The new rules also impact Black troops who often require medical waivers for Pseudofolliculitis Barbae (PFB), a painful skin condition caused by shaving. Medical waivers are now limited to 12 months, with a requirement for a treatment plan, after which soldiers face potential involuntary separation if the condition persists.

At the unusual meeting, addressing nearly 800 generals, admirals and senior enlisted leaders, Hegseth, a former Army National Guard officer, also mocked servicemembers with facial hair, referring to them as "beardo-s" and "fat generals," in the presence of President Donald Trump who too in his address threatened to fire top military leaders who disagree with him while his defense secretary accused the Pentagon of suffering from weakness and "woke" decay. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told the country's military elite new reforms would weed political correctness from the U.S. armed forces. The president told a packed meeting of commanders in Quantico, Virginia, "If you don't like what I'm saying, you can leave the room. Of course, there goes your rank, there goes your future, but you just feel nice and loose, ok?" At one point during his 72-minute address, Trump referenced a racial slur while discussing nuclear weapons. “I call it the N-word," he told his audience of mostly stone-faced officers. "There are two N-words and you can’t use either of them.” With Trump as his backstop, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth unleashed a new array of directives, telling the country's military elite that they had gone soft and his new reforms would weed out political correctness from the world's most powerful armed forces.

Hegseth, a former Fox News host, railed against "decay" at the Defense Department, telling the assembled commanders he would crack down on physical fitness and grooming standards, and throw out "woke" policies. He spoke of “fat generals and admirals.”

Trump vowed to fire military leaders ''right on the spot" as he left for the high-stakes summit on Sept. 30. Echoing Trump's threats, Hegseth said if any senior officers did not resonate with his message, they should resign.

"If the words I’m speaking today are making your heart sink, you should do the honorable thing and resign." According to Pentagon policy memos, fitness tests will increase in frequency and intensity for active-duty troops, who must now pass twice-yearly tests. Military members will also have their body fat measured twice per year.

Troops with combat-focused jobs, such as infantrymen or tank crew members, must meet male-based test standards in their annual general fitness test, and they must also complete a "combat field test" once yearly.

Hegseth, who has long argued that women benefited from lowered fitness standards when they entered combat arms jobs during former President Barack Obama's administration, said the move "is not about preventing women from serving."

Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-New York, the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, blasted Trump and Hegseth for what he called empty posturing that failed to address the country's national security challenges.

“President Trump offered no national security vision, just rambling grievances and partisan attacks," Meeks said in a statement. "Even worse, his call to use U.S. cities as ‘training grounds’ for the military is chilling. This is what dictators do.""For his part, Secretary Hegseth’s rants about ‘dudes in dresses’ and other culture-war bogeymen only underscored his unfitness to lead," Meeks said. He called for Hegseth to resign over his "overall lack of professionalism and experience."

Trump told the assembled generals and admirals of his plans to take on "the enemy within" using military power.

"Last month, I signed an executive order to provide training for a quick reaction force that can help quell civil disturbances," he said. "So this is going to be a big thing for the people in this room, because it's the enemy from within, and we have to handle it before it gets out of control."

Using street crime and anti-deportation protests as his justification, Trump has ordered National Guard troops to Los Angeles, Washington, DC, Memphis and Portland. He also ordered active-duty Marines to Los Angeles.

Retired Lt. Gen Mark Hertling said Trump's speech was "somewhat shocking" and "filled with mistruths."

Hertling, the former commander of Army forces in Europe, said, "I found my mouth open. I just couldn't believe some of the things that were being said to this group of individuals who have such experience." "I find it really offensive that anyone is insulting them, and claiming that their promotions and their advancement through the services are the result of policies or 'wokeness' or DEI," Hertling said. "It's just not true." Trump told U.S. military leaders at Quantico on Sept. 30 that he refers to the nuclear threat as the “N-word,” referencing a racial slur.

The president noted he sent nuclear submarines “over to the coast of Russia” in response to provocative comments by a Russian spokesperson referencing a nuclear control system.

“We can’t let people throw around that word,” Trump said. “I call it the N-word. There are two N-words and you can’t use either of them.”

Hegseth's remarks dovetailed with his long-held views − the subject of his 2024 book, The War on Warriors − that diversity initiatives, political correctness and a perceived lowering of standards on behalf of women made the military weaker.

At the Quantico meeting, Hegseth said those convictions led him to fire a number of top officers, an apparent allusion to the abrupt retirements of Joint Chiefs chairman Air Force Gen. C.Q. Brown, former Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti, the top lawyers of the Army and Air Force, and Army Gen. Timothy Haugh of U.S. Cyber Command and the National Security Agency, among others.

"It's nearly impossible to change a culture with the same people who helped create, or even benefitted from, that culture," Hegseth said, explaining he has attempted to spare officers who were merely complying with the previous administration's orders and to fire those who "are truly invested in the 'Woke Department.'"

Days after he dispatched the National Guard to Portland, Trump said “dangerous cities” should be used as military “training grounds.”

“We should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military,” Trump said.

Trump has already deployed the National Guard to the southern border, to Los Angeles to quell protests against mass deportations, and to the streets of Washington, DC, where many are now tasked with "beatification" projects like picking up trash and raking leaves. "Washington, DC, went from our most unsafe city to just about our safest city in a period of a month," he told the Quantico audience.

These statements struck Mark Cancian, a senior defense advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, as worrisome.

"If he puts out some directive specifying that the military should use lethal force, then that could be a huge problem," Cancian said. "The military is just not trained in the nuances about civilian rights and the use of lethal force," he added.

The audience was made up of men and women of various ages in military uniforms with neat haircuts. Pool reports indicate the crowd was much more still and quiet than what Trump is accustomed to at political events or campaign rallies.

Several officers were sitting in a row, looking expressionless and inscrutable, with few smiles.

The president's attacks on former President Joe Biden were met with silence, the pool report said. Some of Trump's lines elicited polite ripples of laughter. One man in a Navy uniform was taking notes in a book. Another was rolling his head and looking restless as the president railed against the media.

Trump praised the generals as “incredible people” straight out of “central casting.”

He said it was his idea to make the Defense Department’s name the War Department, a name it carried before it was changed in the years after World War II.

“That was probably the first sign of wokeness,” he said of the name change.

Hundreds of the U.S. military's seniormost officers and enlisted troops attended the event, including top generals from around the world.

The Pentagon did not provide an attendee list.

A camera pan during Hegseth's remarks appeared to capture two of the military's most far-flung brass in the auditorium: Army Gen. Xavier Brunson, who leads American and United Nations forces in South Korea, and Navy Adm. Samuel Paparo, who heads U.S. Indo-Pacific Command from his Hawaii headquarters.

Many other top generals also appeared on the official video feed, including U.S. Northern Command leader Air Force Gen. Gregory Guillot, who oversees the military's work along the Mexico border and its immigration enforcement support; Army Gen. Bryan Fenton, who heads U.S. Special Operations Command; and Air Force Gen. Anthony Cotton, who oversees the nation's nuclear {censored}nal atop U.S. Strategic Command.

On just a week's notice, Hegseth mandated all senior commanders at the rank of brigadier general or rear admiral lower half and above to report to the Virginia base around 40 miles south of Washington, DC. President Donald Trump revealed days before the meeting that he would also address the generals.
Defense experts said the volume of top generals and their entourages descending on the base and the small town it surrounds was likely to create traffic snarls and a security nightmare. Beginning the day before the meeting, "residents can expect increased security checks, altered traffic patterns and increased security personnel," read a public notice on the town of Quantico's Facebook page.

The cost of the meeting – bringing the senior officers and their staff to Quantico, lodging them, and securing the area – could add up to millions of dollars, experts told USA TODAY.

"A thing like this has never been done before because they came from all over the world and there’s a little bit of expense, not much, but there’s a little expense for that," Trump said of the unprecedented meeting.

Democratic lawmakers and other critics blasted the meeting as a waste of money and said taking the nation's top generals off their jobs for a pep rally-type event was a bad idea.
 
Last edited:

Warriorlight

Writer
SPNer
Mar 6, 2025
77
3
38
Trump has been continuously targeting India. The latest is an increase of tariffs to 50%, which obviously appears to subdue India to make it accept certain trade negotiations, which India can accept only at its peril, especially the opening of agriculture-related fields so that the USA could dump its produce into India.
Increasing pressure on India before US negotiators are expected to reach India on August 25, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday doubled the tariffs on India to 50 percent, but there is a 21-day window before the additional tariff of 25 percent comes into effect, offering India a window to strike a trade deal.
A White House statement said that the US will impose an “additional 25 percent ad valorem duty” above the 25 percent reciprocal tariffs announced on August 1 to “deal with the national emergency stemming from Russia’s actions in Ukraine.” This tariff is deemed necessary and appropriate due to India’s “direct or indirect import of Russian Federation oil,” which the president judges will more effectively address the national emergency, the executive order said.
The additional tariffs dramatically raise pressure on India, as most of its competitors, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and now China, are not at lower tariffs. However, exporters said that US tariff-related uncertainty is already disrupting trade and that Indian exporters have grown wary of exporting to the US. About half of India’s total exports of $80 billion are, however, in the exemption list that includes products such as pharma and electronics goods.
While the fresh order takes the total US tariffs to their highest on any country globally, it also offers a fresh window for discussion. The Indian Express had reported on Saturday that key economic ministries have been asked for inputs to sweeten the US trade deal stuck on India’s resistance to US demand for access in the Indian agri market.

“This 25 percent ad valorem duty will be effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time 21 days after the date of the order. There are exceptions for goods that were loaded onto a vessel and in transit before this effective date and are entered for consumption or withdrawn from the warehouse for consumption before 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on September 17, 2025,” the order read.

In actuality, China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India (just under 2 million a day) and Turkey. The US had agreed to lower tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent from 145 per cent in May. The executive order does not make a mention of China, but instead stipulates a mechanism wherein the US Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with other senior officials, “will monitor if any other country (beyond India) is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil and recommend further action”.
Indian exporters are in a fix, scrambling to retain access to the US — their most valuable export market, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of India’s total outbound shipments. The newly announced duties target several of India's top-performing export sectors, like auto components, steel, aluminum, smartphones, gems and jewellery. Pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and critical minerals, however, have been excluded.
The Indian government has said that it will safegauard its national and economic interests. Indian officials have indicated that the US is unwilling to negotiate sectoral tariffs — such as those on steel and automobiles — which have already impacted nearly $5 billion worth of Indian exports. Evan A. Feigenbaum, Vice President for Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said on Monday that US-India relations may now become a political football, especially in New Delhi. He warned that the core understandings that enabled closer ties may be at serious risk, as New Delhi had largely assumed Washington would take political risks to strengthen the relationship — something Trump has not done and clearly will not do.

The split in relations is further underscored by Trump’s effusive praise for Islamabad and recent engagement with Pakistan’s army and government — developments that raise obvious concerns in New Delhi. “The United States was roiled by India’s ties to Iran, Myanmar, and later Russia. Trump and his administration are now moving to sanction and tariff India over its oil trade with Russia. This significantly shifts the bar for bilateral relations,” he said. The sweeping measure, aimed at correcting what Trump described as “obnoxious” non-tariff barriers, is being seen as both a protectionist move and a pointed diplomatic signal.
For a president who maintains overly friendly ties with Netanyahu, a leader responsible for the deliberate holocaust of thousands of children and civilians in Gaza, this move is hardly surprising. Fairness and moral consideration cannot be expected from such leadership. Similarly, Prime Minister Modi, given his track record as the Butcher of Gujarat, cannot be assumed to act independently of external pressures. Politics today is ruthlessly driven by power, often at the expense of innocent lives, and it is sad that ordinary, decent people in India may now bear the consequences of decisions made by those indifferent to human suffering.

It must be acknowledged that the US has crossed into police-state territory. Troops patrolling cities, stripping religious freedoms in the military, and threatening civilians show that basic rights and freedoms are being sidelined. This isn’t security, it’s authoritarian control, and it must be challenged. History proves That governments often chip away at freedoms incrementally, gradually exposing citizens to unchecked authority.
 
Last edited:
📌 For all latest updates, follow the Official Sikh Philosophy Network Whatsapp Channel:
Top