Guru Nanak Dev Ji: Mission, Method, and Moral Vision
- A Dialogical Inquiry
Prof. Dr. Harpal Singh Buttar Prof. Dr. Devinder Pal Singh
- A Dialogical Inquiry
Prof. Dr. Harpal Singh Buttar Prof. Dr. Devinder Pal Singh
[On 31st December 2025, Prof. Dr. Harpal Singh Buttar (HSB), Senior Scientist, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada, & Adjunct Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, contacted Dr. Devinder Pal Singh (DPS), Professor of Religious Studies, Arihanta Institute, San Jose, California, USA, & Director of the Center for Understanding Sikhism, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, to explore the various aspects of Sikh Faith, Values and Heritage. This interaction resulted in the following deliberation.]
HSB: What was the real mission of Guru Nanak Dev Ji? I am not seeking or asking for Gurbani quotes, but for a narrative on the Real Mission of Guru Nanak Dev Ji?
DPS: Guru Nanak Dev Ji’s real mission was the radical reorientation of human consciousness: from ritual, hierarchy, fear, and domination toward truthful living grounded in divine unity, ethical action, and social responsibility.
He did not come merely to critique religious practices; he came to redefine what it means to live a spiritual life. For Guru Nanak, spirituality was not withdrawal from the world but deep engagement with it: earning honestly, sharing equitably, and remembering the Divine while living amid society. His mission was to dismantle false separations: sacred vs. secular, Hindu vs. Muslim, priest vs. layperson, pure vs. impure.
At its core, his mission was:
- To expose the emptiness of external religiosity without inner transformation.
- To establish a universal spiritual ethic rooted in justice, humility, compassion, and truth.
- To make direct experience of the Divine accessible to all, without intermediaries.
DPS: Guru Nanak was born into a traditional agrarian and administrative household with expectations shaped by social norms. His parents saw intelligence but interpreted it through conventional markers of success: education, employment, and social conformity.
His silences, refusals, and inward orientation did not align with societal ideas of brilliance. Like many transformative figures, Guru Nanak’s genius lay outside the grammar of his time. His parents were loving but socially conditioned; they could not foresee a role that did not yet exist.
HSB: Did Guru Nanak Dev Ji want to create a new religion, such as Sikhism?
DPS: No, not in the institutional sense.
Guru Nanak did not set out to found “Sikhism” as a separate religion. He articulated a path (panth), a disciplined way of living rooted in truth, remembrance, and ethical action. Institutional Sikhism evolved later, especially from Guru Arjan Dev Ji onward, in response to historical pressures.
Guru Nanak’s concern was the transformation of life, not the construction of religious boundaries.
HSB: Did Guru Nanak want to reform Hindu rituals and superstitious values preached and imposed by the Brahmins?
DPS: He was not a “reformer” in the limited sense. Reform presupposes preservation of the structure.
Guru Nanak questioned the authority of ritual itself when divorced from ethics. His critique extended beyond Brahmins to all religious elites, Hindu and Muslim alike. He opposed:
- Mechanical rituals
- Birth-based spiritual hierarchy
- Fear-based theology
HSB: From where did Guru Nanak learn Sadh Bhasha?
DPS: Sadh Bhasha was not learned formally; it was absorbed organically.
Guru Nanak grew up at a crossroads of languages: Punjabi, Persian, Arabic, Sanskritic traditions, and vernacular dialects used by saints across North India. His extensive travels exposed him to living speech communities rather than to scholastic institutions.
He used Sadh Bhasha because:
- It was intelligible across regions.
- It transcended elite linguistic control.
- It allowed spiritual ideas to circulate freely among common people.
DPS: Both.
His travels were experiential laboratories, where insights were crystallized through encounters. Kartarpur later became the space of consolidation, where teachings were systematized, sung, remembered, and transmitted communally.
Kartarpur represents the embodiment of his vision: spiritual life integrated with agriculture, labour, family, and community.
HSB: Why did he collect Bhagat Bani from high- and low-caste saints?
DPS: This was a revolutionary theological act.
By preserving the voices of saints across caste, gender, and occupation, Guru Nanak:
- Rejected spiritual monopoly
- Affirmed truth as experiential, not hereditary
- Demonstrated that Divine wisdom speaks wherever humility and sincerity exist
HSB: Why did he give Gur Gaddi to Guru Angad Dev Ji, who used to be the worshiper of the Hindu Devis and Devtas, and not his sons?
DPS: Guru Nanak Dev Ji’s decision to bestow Gur Gaddi upon Guru Angad Dev Ji (Bhai Lehna) rather than his own sons was one of the most deliberate, principled, and revolutionary acts in South Asian religious history. It was not incidental, emotional, or mystical; it was deeply ethical, pedagogical, and civilizational.
1. Spiritual authority over bloodline: Guru Nanak decisively rejected hereditary succession. In the social world of 15th–16th century India, where religious authority was almost always transmitted through lineage, this choice shattered the assumption that spiritual leadership is inherited. By passing the Gur Gaddi to Guru Angad Dev Ji, he established that inner transformation, discipline, and humility, not birth, qualify one to lead.
This single act prevented Sikh thought from collapsing into dynastic priesthood, a fate that had weakened many religious traditions before.
2. Guru Angad’s prior worship of Devis and Devtas was irrelevant: Bhai Lehna’s earlier devotion to Hindu deities was not a disqualification; it was evidence of spiritual sincerity. Guru Nanak did not judge seekers by where they started, but by how completely they transformed.
What mattered was that Bhai Lehna:
- Completely reoriented his consciousness toward the One Reality.
- Demonstrated absolute surrender of ego.
- Lived the Guru’s teaching with unwavering discipline.
- Served without ambition, hesitation, or self-importance.
3. A living demonstration that transformation is possible: By choosing someone who had once practiced deity worship, Guru Nanak sent a profound message: Spiritual truth is not inherited, nor frozen in past beliefs; it is realized through transformation.
This decision made Sikh thought radically open: anyone, regardless of previous theology, caste, or practice, could embody the Guru’s path if they lived it fully.
4. Why not his sons? Guru Nanak’s sons were not rejected as individuals, but they did not embody the spiritual orientation required for Gur Gaddi.
They were shaped by:
- Social expectations of inheritance.
- Attachment to status or authority.
- Partial acceptance rather than total surrender.
5. Establishing the Sikh principle of merit-based leadership: This succession established a core Sikh principle that later Gurus upheld: leadership flows from ethical and spiritual maturity, not genealogy. This principle later enabled:
- Resistance to caste hierarchy.
- Institutional discipline.
- Collective authority (eventually leading to the Guru Panth).
Guru Nanak Dev Ji did not choose Guru Angad Dev Ji despite his past; he chose him because Angad Dev Ji's life proved that the Guru’s path works. The Gur Gaddi was not a reward; it was a responsibility entrusted to the one who had erased himself enough to let the Guru’s vision flow through him unaltered.
HSB: Did he want to unite Hindus and Muslims and create harmony and peace among them?
DPS: Yes, but not by blending religions.
Guru Nanak sought ethical and spiritual unity, not theological compromise. He exposed hypocrisy on both sides and insisted that being Hindu or Muslim was meaningless without justice, humility, and compassion.
His goal was human solidarity grounded in divine unity.
HSB: Did he work to uplift the status of women, oppose the custom of Sati, and support the marriage of divorced or widowed Hindu women?
DPS: Yes, structurally and philosophically.
Guru Nanak:
- Rejected misogynistic theology.
- Affirmed women’s spiritual autonomy.
- Supported dignity in marriage and widowhood.
- Opposed practices like Sati implicitly by rejecting purity-pollution ideology.
HSB: Did he work to uplift the fate of untouchables and abandon the caste system practiced by the Hindus?
DPS: Absolutely.
Guru Nanak:
- Ate with all.
- Sang with all.
- Elevated labour as sacred.
- Rejected ritual purity.
HSB: Why did he go to the religious gatherings of the Sidh Yogis and hold conversations with them, as well as Hindu and Muslim saints and sages and visit the holy shrines of the Hindus and Muslims during his travels?
DPS: Because truth must be tested in dialogue.
He engaged Sidhs, yogis, ulema, and saints to:
- Challenge spiritual escapism.
- Demonstrate spirituality within social life.
- Expose contradictions between belief and conduct.
HSB: Did he want to show the Hindu and Muslim clergy the new way of thinking and preach the Oneness of God and the Oneness of Humanity?
DPS: Yes; this is the axis of his vision.
Divine unity implied human equality. Fragmented humanity was, for Guru Nanak, evidence of spiritual ignorance. Ethical life was the proof of theological understanding.
HSB: Why did he join Namaz with Daulat Khan Lodhi to teach him a lesson that his Namaz was fake and false?
DPS: This was symbolic pedagogy.
By standing in Namaz and then revealing distraction and hypocrisy, Guru Nanak demonstrated that external conformity without inner presence is spiritual fraud. The lesson was universal, not anti-Islamic.
HSB: Did Guru Nanak believe in or perform any miracles during his life?
DPS: No.
He believed in inner transformation, not spectacle. Janam-sakhi miracle stories emerged later as devotional embellishments. Guru Nanak consistently redirected attention from wonder to wisdom.
HSB: Was his disappearance for 2-3 days in the rivulet at Sultanpur Lodhi a miracle?
DPS: Historically, it marks a spiritual awakening moment, not a supernatural event.
It symbolizes a break from prior identity, a rebirth into universal mission. Whether literal or symbolic, its meaning lies in what followed, not in mystification.
Guru Nanak Dev Ji was not a prophet of fear, ritual, or exclusion, nor a miracle-worker seeking followers. He was a teacher of consciousness, a radical humanist grounded in divine unity, who laid the foundations of a truth-centred civilization.
HSB: Dear Veer Devinder Pal Singh Ji! I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your scholarly answers to my questions.
DPS: Professor Sahib, I sincerely appreciate your curiosity and your thoughtful interest in engaging with candid questions about the Sikh faith.
******
Last edited:
