Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

Atheism Richard Dawkins: The Man Who Gave Atheism a Bad Name

Discussion in 'Interfaith Dialogues' started by spnadmin, Mar 20, 2010.

  1. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    Richard Dawkins – The Man Who Gave Atheism a Bad Name

    zenbullets.com
    home of matt pearson, maker of abstract things.

    Richard Dawkins – evolutionary biologist, popular science writer, professional atheist and all round very clever person. I’ve read a number of Dawkins’ books; he is a very entertaining writer. He talks knowledgeably about biology and general science and delights in the hypocrisy and irrationality of the modern religions. He also invented one of my favourite pseudo-sciences – memetics. In theory he should be my hero, today he’s going to be the opposite. Mister Dawkins, j’accuse – you are the man who gave atheism a bad name.

    I hate organized religion as much as the next son of an evangelist. It is no secret that irrational belief has done more damage to human society than anything else in history. We spent 1,000 years in the “Dark Ages”, when an out of control hyper-meme called ‘Christianity’ almost extinguished the wisdom of the Ancients Greeks, and probably successfully eradicated many more fragile ideologies (we have no way of knowing). The amount of blood shed in religious wars, and the amount still to be shed, appalls me, but no longer surprises me. Organised religion is the worst of tribal mentality, and we of the Age of Reason should be above that.

    Richard Dawkins writes upon this subject in his most recent book, The God Delusion. He correctly points out that the human mind is vulnerable to certain types of memetic viruses, those that play on our fear of death, the unknown, and our arrogance as a species. Religions are the most sophisticated and resilient of these memes. But there is hypocrisy to his message, because while he writes eloquently of atheism, he doesn’t acknowledge that he has his own belief system, one that he clings to as desperately, and espouses as vocally, as any evangelical Christian.

    Richard Dawkins has been the loudest prophet of Darwinism the world has ever known. He is Saul level. He has been perhaps the most significant single influence in the current popularity of the Theory of Evolution since Darwin himself. He calls Evolution a science, but this is a common misconception. It is a faith.

    Darwin’s great theory is most probably right on the mark, there is a lot for evidence for it. But Evolution is not the kind of theory that can be conclusively proved in the same way gravity, heliocentricism, or a round earth can be proved. You cannot make a prediction of a state that can be measured after time t, which can then be tested at time t to see if it meets the prediction. The fossil record is very incomplete (representing less than 1% of all species who have lived on our planet), so if you were to look at time t for a fossil, it is very unlikely you would find it there.

    The Theory, while a wonderful idea, and a beautifully elegant explanation for the question of how we got here, does not fit the bill of a conventional scientific theory. It also still has a few gaps in it’s explanation, gaps that requires a faith they will one day be filled. Evolution is a wonderful, elegant and popular idea, but we still have to choose whether we believe it or not.

    In The Origin of Species, Darwin worried that Evolution was without sufficient proof, but held tightly to the belief that one day the fossil record would provide it. But Dawkins simply believes the theory to be ‘the truth’, i.e. beyond questioning, which is why his writings, entertaining though they are, always remind me of theological conversations with my Dad, who dismisses any viewpoint that doesn’t include the existence of God as simply irrelevant. Evolution is Dawkins ideology, and he suffers the same problem. Dawkins is an Evolutionary Fundamentalist.

    But one advantage an Evolutionary Fundamentalist has over a Christian Fundamentalist is that Dawkins’ belief is in line with the zeitgeist right now, just as Creationism was only 90 years ago (prior to the Scopes trial in 1925). So he will sell a lot of books, because he is telling us what we want to hear. Whereas I won’t. But it’s nice to think that, what would have got you burned at the stake a 1000 years ago, can make you a multi-millionaire these days, so good on him.
    Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.
    - Richard Dawkins
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Loading...


  3. Tejwant Singh

    Tejwant Singh United States
    Expand Collapse
    Mentor Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,559
    Likes Received:
    6,988
    In other words: Dawkins is the head of the " Evolutionist Dera".

    Interesting arguments made by Matt Pearson about convictions, no matter which conviction one holds dear to oneself.

    Thanks Narayanjot ji.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    Tejwant ji

    The commentary under that article - in the form of a blog - is fascinating - giving arguments for and against the scientific status of evolution. Though natural selection as the best explanation so far of evolution, including Mr. Pearson, they differ as to whether as a theory it can be tested. And whether it rises to the status of something to "believe" That conversation alone is worth the read. Mr. Pearson's critique of the theory of evolution as a theory may be a tad stretched, however, indeed his point is that Dawkins' can at times sound like a Darwin derawale.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Gursikh Singh

    Gursikh Singh
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2010
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    16
    Evolution is a scientific fact, however there are theories on how it occurs, one of which is "Through Natural Selection".

    To summarise.

    Evolution is a scientific fact
    Evolution through natural selection is a theory.

    Don't get the two confused!
    :geeksingh:
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. ArshSingh1984

    ArshSingh1984
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    3

    Theory is a model to explain a fact. It is not a stretch to imagine that over millions of years the faster animals that can outrun lions would be able to propagate their species. Richard Dawkins is the voice of reason for our generation. He argues against superstitious thought and promotes rationality. I happen to agree with the God Delusion and think that religiosity gives credence to irrationality. Dawkins cannot be a Derawala because unlike God-promoters, Dawkins has facts and statistics and science on his side. Please do not put science under the same microscope as religion. Religion cannot hold its own against science.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page