Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

Opinion Beyond Chamkaur: Wars, Battles & Memories

Discussion in 'Sikh Sikhi Sikhism' started by IJSingh, Dec 23, 2015.

  1. IJSingh

    IJSingh United States
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    371
    Around us the world, particularly the Christians are busier than a bee celebrating Christmas. These are intriguing times for Sikhs across the globe as well. We celebrate the 350th anniversary of the birth of the Tenth Master, Guru Gobind Singh whose stewardship of the then 200 years old Sikh movement was transformational. He put the finishing touches to the Sikh message. Guru Gobind Singh fought many battles with the forces of that time that were inimical to Sikhi – the Islamists of the day aided and abetted by Hindu chieftains and satraps who were intolerant of the universal but unique message of Sikhism.

    chamkaur.jpg

    Another seminal event continues to connect us to those times – Chamkaur, where the two older sons of Guru Gobind Singh were martyred in battle. Days later the two younger sons were in custody of the Muslim rulers and were sentenced to death.

    Many historians, as well as some kathavachaks, look at this as a “lost” battle. For better than 300 years Sikhs worldwide have been commemorating the siege and “fall” of the fort of Chamkaur in December 1705. Our local gurduaras are now in the midst of elaborate commemorations.

    And that’s the way most, if not all, historians – Sikhs or non-Sikhs -- have looked at it as a historic fall and setback to the Khalsa led by Guru Gobind Singh. My take is more nuanced and different.

    History tells us that Anandpur was besieged by an overwhelming force of the Imperial troops and their Hindu ruling allies. Anandpur was vacated by Guru Gobind Singh on the night of December 5th and 6th accompanied by his family and four sons, because the besieging forces had falsely promised the Guru safe passage. The column of Sikhs and their Guru was attacked enroute. They reached the Sirsa River which was in spate. The Guru and his two older sons, Ajit Singh and Jujhar Singh with a small retinue of Sikhs successfully forded the river and reached Chamkaur on the evening of December 6th. But in the process they got separated from the two younger sons, Zorawwer Singh, barely 9 years old and Fateh Singh who was almost 7, and also their grandmother, the Guru’s mother. Such was the chaos of battle.

    History tells us that there were few Sikh warriors with Guru Gobind Singh when he arrived at Chamkaur. With the Guru were his two older sons. The Imperial troops, egged on and abetted by the local Hindu chieftains, saw an unparalleled opportunity to deliver a final lethal blow to the Sikh movement. And they seized the moment. Carpe diem, as they say.

    The battle raged fiercely. The numbers of fighters on each side were grossly mismatched. The Imperialist enemy forces were larger than the Sikh defenders by a magnitude. This meant that from within the fort Sikh fighters emerged in groups of five one sally at a time, to engage the enemy and they fought until martyred. Then a new Sikh fighter emerged from the fort to carry the battle forward. Thus, Ajit Singh and Jujhar Singh, the two older sons of Guru Gobind Singh, attained martyrdom.

    Days later, because of the perfidy of their attendant Gangu Brahmin, these young boys barely 7 and 9 years old, along with their grandmother were in the custody of the Nawab of Sirhand. At a trial in a kangaroo court where they pointedly refused to recant their faith, the two were sentenced to death and bricked up alive.

    This, in a nutshell, ended four promising young lives. These events have become defining markers of Sikhi and the worldwide Sikhs, a nation without borders, has always commemorated the day with intense emotional connection to it. We hear these details at every gurduara across the world every year, and we rue the callousness of those who wielded power. In fact, the four sons – martyrs all, are specifically remembered at every Sikh prayer.

    Do these events mark a historic defeat and setback for the Khalsa and Guru Gobind Singh as many historians posit even while they charitably underplay it and gloss over it?

    Most readers know the details so I will not touch them any further. Today, I aim to offer you a slightly different perspective on it. My take today is not a tear jerker at all.

    These weeks, sermons in gurduaras repeat the message of a setback in Sikh fortunes by the fall of Chamkaur. Just days ago we heard a good one along these lines and then when at home those close to me took the same direction as well, they jolted awake my contrarian instincts.

    Why didn’t Guru Gobind Singh and his few surviving Sikhs set up a stand like the small unit of barely 21 Sikhs at Saragarhi 200 years later? In this every Sikh perished in a historic battle with Afghani hordes and won top honors and medals for courage?

    Think a moment with me. The warof life offers us a plate full of battles. Ergo any significant war is likely to be composed of many battles.

    A good commander will see the whole vista that is the sum of many parts; the larger scene of many possible or active fronts, as well as the particular battle being fought at that specific time; weigh the resources at his command and the relative strength of the enemy. Visualize the long-term repercussions of a contemplated action, and order a strategic change of tactics that allows a resifting and retooling of energy and tactics. Look at any major war and the shifting fronts and tactics that often dot the landscape.

    This is how battles are defined and conducted. And I would say that this is what the Guru did, considering that he had only 5 Sikh fighters left with him and they were surrounded in hostile territory by hordes in the thousands. A suicidal mission would have been dramatic but then what …perhaps unproductive.

    Allow me to illustrate my view with a trivial but tangential detour and not so dramatic an example to buttress my argument. About 50 years ago I was a student and, like most students, perpetually short of funds. So I looked for a night job. When I appeared for the interview the boss looked askance at my turban; this was a time when I was perhaps the only man with a turban in that part of the United States.

    The minimum pay scale then was $1.50 an hour. Without explanation or pause he offered me $1.25. I was flabbergasted but desperate. I did not have the wherewithal to mount a legal challenge, nor was there any community nearby to offer solace, comfort or encouragement. So I accepted the illegally lower wage but kept my turban. My job was to precisely mix chemicals in 50 gallon drums to process thousands of color films every night. (This was way before digital cameras.) Two weeks later, my boss realized that I was a reasonably educated graduate student and knew sufficient chemistry as well. He promptly doubled my salary and all turned out well.

    My justification: It seemed wiser to shift tactics than to engage in a head on battle for which I lacked resources and was unprepared. I felt in my heart that my gentler tactics would work out.

    If Guru Gobind Singh shifted tactics at Chamkaur the only question is this: Was the Guru successful in the long run? On that, history offers us an unqualified and resounding “yes.”

    Sikhi survived the events at Chamkaur. In fact it was emboldened. Within a few years Sikhs had liberated Punjab from the Imperialists and established a governing system where the people were sovereign and self rule prevailed.

    No one can argue with the truism that we all must die, no matter how virtuous, strong or admired in life. But how long does the world, even our most intimate kith and kin, remember us? Perhaps a day, a week, a month or a year; sometimes at memorial meetings for colleagues at the office it may be as little as thirty seconds. In the larger scheme of things these remain merely the blink of an eye.

    It has been over 300 years since the happenings at and about Chamkaur and how well do we remember the four sons of Guru Gobind Singh? Every year without fail! The past is a prelude to the future so how long will we continue to remember them? I would say as long as there are Sikhs – through the end of time, I would guess. Let these four sons of the Guru remain our inspiration – yesterday, today and tomorrow. There was no compromise, merely a resourceful shifting of battle grounds and tactics. And this is the question that life often drops in our overfilled inbox.

    Now Chamkaur and its history are embedded in the Sikh DNA. There could be no better outcome?

    The danger of ignoring such lessons and opportunities is that one can win battles while losing the war.

    December 22, 2015
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Loading...


  3. Chaan Pardesi

    Chaan Pardesi
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    767
    I don't know where in the air, has IJ Singh plucked that "some writers" say these two battles were a "defeat" for the small arising Sikh community.No Sikh has ever said or accepted that Anandpur Sahib or the Battle of Chamkaur was a "defeat" as claimed by IJ Singh.IJ Singh's failure to offer references to who said what , how and where such was said is testimonious that nothing such really has ever been said by honourable and reputable serious writers.

    However, the biased and right wing Hindu facist writers have written more than often such nonsensical myths, without an iota of truth nor understanding of reality.These are not writers and cannot be claimed to be, worth a nickel for dried up onions.Similar writers are responsibile for false literature created and attained to Guru Gobind Singh; to belittle the Guru and halt the transformational awakening of Sikhi.

    This idea is - to create doubts in the minds of Sikhs, about Guru Gobind SIngh ji and the reallity of history. Similar doubts as have been created by the alleged writings in a book called dasam.

    Many top academics have been claiming that Banda Singh Bahadur was the first great Sikh General- a fact that I challenge strongly and say he was not the first great Sikh general.

    The very first Sikh general was Guru Hargobind Sahib, who for the very first time organised Sikhs into a fighting force and took on four wars, culminating in his victory in all.

    The next to be greater than GREATEST Sikh General was GURU GOBIND SINGH -The Magnificent GURU-and His Majesty continues to top the list of the greatest general of the Sikhs.His valour, bravery and courage is known to all and yet little is really understood by even the Sikhs about his military skiils.

    The story of Guru Gobind Singh ji has been little shared by Sikhs with the rest of the world despite the fact he gave the Sikhs the undeniably unique identity that Sikhs are known for the world over.The beautiful known dimensions of the Tenth Master of Sikhism are many, but strangely few applaud it and fewer still follow them, as they lack the understanding and knowledge!

    Guru Gobind Singh Ji's forty two brief earthly years were filled with multi- sided activity.His versatility would baffle many historians and readers, as well people of religion.Different aspects of his characterismatic genius may have been pondered and studied, many in minute details repeatedly often.There is already a considerable body of written material that exists, treating him as a spiritual leader, a poet,a social revolutionary, a maker of history, an upholder of moral values in war and peace aand so on.But what has constantly remained scant and received scant attention from qualified scholars is an appreciation of his military ingenuity.

    No one has ever tried to understand his great leadership, personality,character and the magnitutude of his greatness.

    When we consider, the Tenth Master's sole aim in life and of life , like his predessors was the elevation of man in a nation that was down trodden; and depressed of social beings that were forever, at the receiving end of cruelity and harshest treatment from the powers that be.In such trying times, Guru Gobind Singh ji's message presented a challenging idea,a ray of hope and a feature of which was the charateristic valour.It was Guru Gobind Singh Ji's unique personality which refused the idea of defeat in his fight for defending the rights & claims of conscience.The magnetic spirit of fighting for the cause of righteousness infused in his disciples by Guru Gobind Singh Ji,enabled the common folk to endure hardship, imprisonment, torture and death in a lighter vein.With the guidance given by Guru Gobind Singh ji, the Sikhs became a community that remains defiant and vibrant in face defeat, and vibrantly over comes all odds at the thickest of times known to them in history.

    Guru Gobind Singh ji rightly and successfully tackled all odds thrown at him by the tyrant rulers and powers.No matter how cruel and harsh they became, his career and achievements remained rightly focussed.The strategy of war adopted by him and his leadership traits remained judiously righteous and fair.Guru Gobind Singh Ji's intellect and wisdom gave him comprehension of the highest truth, his warm heart led him to devote and sacrifice his sons, wealth aand his own life, to save his countrymen suffering from the tyranical injustices.With such broad and clear thinking his military genius created world reknowned marvellous soldiers.

    Strangely even among the Sikhs, his military genius has received very little appreciation.The term "military genius"should not be taken within any narrow sense because Guru Gobind Singh Ji not only led his floowers in battle and won spectacular victories against untold heavy odds, but also almost miraculously created out of an incombatant commonality , a body of men of saintly soldiers and leaders who continued to perform marvellous deeds of sacrifice aand valour even after he, himself had passed through the world.

    Very few Sikh historians and scholars have actually studied or tried to understand how Guru Gobind Singh Ji planned his tactics and strategy.Any academic interest on such a theme should be very interesting , eye opening and academically inspiring for current and future Sikh generations, but sadly this area has remained very little explored, and thus deprived Sikhs of great pride and knowledge about such a marvellous saviour of humanity and Guru.

    Some narrations and evaluation of a few military actions fought by Guru Gobind Singh ji would expose his professional expertise in the science of war.Guru Gobind Singh Ji's forty two brief earthly years were filled with multi- sided activity.His versatility would baffle many historians and readers as well people of religion.

    In this what is common, is that both the historical and non historical works of the earlier writers and that of modern day writers is the remarkable trait of bravery of Guru Gobind Singh and his Sikhs, which distinguishes them from others.

    BRAVERY, here does not merely mean fighting by brave soldiers in the battlefield, it is the broad sense covering the courage , determination, the fortitude and the heroism shown by these people in and out of the battle field.It is in this context we remember the battle of Chamkaur, and the battle of Anandpur sahib.

    Such is heroic contribution of a community that numbered merely no more than 2000 people in the whole of the Punjab by 1750s, that the distinguishing names of their heros, within mere 316, will be so many that it will push into significance , the history of any other nation or people.

    A Moslem sufi poet Bulle Shah of that period has rightly said,

    ਨਾ ਕੰਹੂ ਅਬ ਕੀ ਨਾ ਕੰਹੂ ਤਬ ਕੀ

    ਗਰ ਨਾ ਹੋਤੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ

    ਤੋ ਸੁਨੱਤ ਹੋਤੀ ਸਭ ਕੀ ਸੁਨੱਤ

    I dont say of now, nor say of then,
    But truth is, had the Guru
    not appeared, every body would have been
    circumcised and converted to islam.

    Shows just the depth of honesty and courage of the Guru ji.

    BEFORE the seize of Anandpur, the Guru Ji had successfully fought the battle of Bhangani.He selected a place 10 kilometres north east of Paonta to meet the invaders.With small numbers of Sikhs, the invading enemy takes flight, despite that some Pathan soldiers of Pir Buddhu Shah abandonned the battle mid way and fled.This triggered Pir Buddhu Shah and his four sons to enter on side of this Guru ji.The enemy soldiers fled with heavy causailties.Some account of this battle is found in the alledged writings of bachiter Natak.

    Then came the battle of Nadaun, where again Guru Ji with small numbers of Sikhs defeated the Hill rajas and their Mughal partners.

    Then there is the battle of Nirmoh,again a combined force fought against the Guru ji and his very small band of Sikhs for two days, without success.From here the Guru ji crossed over to Basoli across the Satluj River.

    There were only 10,000 force of Sikhs, at Anandpur, while Moghuls had massed in excess of 300,000 by conservative estimates.It is said, many big names of the Mughals and hill rajas fell in the battle at Anandpur.

    It is said, General Said Khan, was wonder stuck, to see the valour of the small number of Sikhs , facing the combined Imperial and Hill raja armies, number into several hundered thousands.When he realised that the Guru was not an enemy of the Musalmaan,but a divine personality, considering everyone his brother,and the war was thrust upon the Guru, he surrendered before the Guru ji and gave up fighting for ever.

    Guru sahib's strategy was of great military genius.To fight at Anandpur the Guru Ji constructed five forts,where he deployed 500 Sikhs in each of the Forts.These were Keshgarh,Anandgarh, Holgarh,Lohgarh and Agampura.

    When the enemy marched from Ropar, the Sikhs engaged them outside Anandpur with view to check their advance.One of the most terrifying war was fought at Anandpur.Havoc was caused by small bands of Sikhs falling upon the enemy, just before night time or day break.

    The seize lasted for over several months.No attempt by the enemy would break the Morale of the Guru and Sikhs.However, when water started running short, Sainapat writes:-

    Char Singh paani ko javan,
    do jhojhen, do pani liawan

    Four Sikhs were going to get water, two engaged with the enemy, and two would successfully bring in the water.

    When the Sikhs realised they were running short of food supplies, they rationed their food intake, to prolong the fight.However, the number of enemy dying in battle was much higher, as the Sikhs chose to engage when and how.

    The Sikhs would come out in the night, attack the heart of the enemy encampment, snatch food and arms from their enemy and retreat back into the fort.The enemy became very panicky and shifted their supplies outside of their camps, making it difficult for themselves.

    The enemy could not prolong their seize, as the local people were getting angry and there was fear they would turn against the army.AFTER, swearing upon the cow, and koran a safe passage to ensure peace for all,was offered to the Guru sahib , if the Guru ji left the Fort WAS GIVEN.

    Eventually, when the Sikhs ordered the Guru ji accept and evacuate the fort, the promises were broken, and the enemy started chasing the Sikhs, looking for an opportune moment to attack.Eventually, they clashed with the Sikhs at Shahi Tibbi, where few Sikhs took on an estimated force of 30,000 men of Wazir Khan of Sirhind.by the end of the day as hundereds of enemy lay dead, few Sikhs including the the Guru's sons' baba Ajit Singh successfully crossed the River Sirsa, where another battle took place, and the Sikhs, Guru Ji and his family became separated from each other.

    Thus, this was never a battle lost, or a defeat for Sikhs.It was all part of a guerilla warefare Sikhs had introduced to Asia.

    The essence of CHARDHI KALA was victorious living far above ordinary in continuous stream of life was the victory in essense for the Guru and the his Sikhs.

    One final point,making comparison between the Gurus battles and current day Saragarhi are two different issues.The battles by the Guru were fought with greater, zeal and energy and spiritual thought, than at Saragarhi-where the only incentive was to ensure the Sikh carried out his duty fully.The difference than was, while the Sikhs failed to tell the world,about our battles at Chamkaur, and Anandpur etc, the BRITISH made sure THEY told the world the heroics of their Sikh soldiers.That is where we failed the battles of Chamkaur and Anandpur, sahib which were fought with greater energy and determination by the Gurus Sikhs.


    ਅਣੱਖੀ ਰੂੱਪ ਦਸਤਾਰ ਦਾ ਵੇਖਣਾ ਜੇ,ਸਿੰਘ ਚੱੜਖੜੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਚੜਦੇ ਵੇਖੋ,
    ਸਾਡਾ ਸਾਰਾ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਦਸਤਾਰ ਦਾ ਏ ,ਵੈਰੀ ਸੱਦਾ ਸਾਂਨੂੰ ਵੰਗਾਰਦੇ ਰਹੇ/
     

    Attached Files:

  4. IJSingh

    IJSingh United States
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    371

    I do appreciate the long post – it is full of good and credible information but the facts here were not being debated in my essay. I am afraid you have misread my column.

    I fail to understand what doubt I am creating in the mind of the reader about history or the Guru’s abilities. Everyone agrees on how small the number of Sikhs was compared to that of the enemy.

    Guerillas fight hidden within the larger community that provides a safe haven. Sikhs did that (guerrilla war) just as many other guerrillas have fought in history, such as in Vietnam etc. The one action at Chamkaur was not guerilla war. Chamkaur was a fort besieged by extremely large forces. It was a set battle. When the number was reduced to 5/6 Sikhs along with the Guru, the choices were two: To continue the fight until the inevitable – death and martyrdom of every Sikh or to get out into the community. Why? The two choices were: 1. To continue the fight to death, or 2. To escape the siege and mobilize the community further.

    History suggests that the Sikhs discussed the matter with the Guru. The issue was resolved – in favor of the second alternative. THIS DOES NOT MAKE IT A DEFEAT. There was a strategic tactical change and the battle was abandoned at that time. This, to my mind, is a compliment to the Guru’s genius. Sometimes such a step is necessary – walk away from a hopeless battle and yet to win the war.

    Now I started thinking this way because, as I said, I heard a kathakar say what I said in the essay and I thought he was too narrow in his thinking. I came home and faced similar opinions from relatives and other Sikhs – young people. The kathakar and the young people were speaking of a losing battle. To me, it was change of tactics. I thought the matter needed clarification.

    I request that you reread carefully what I have written and then certainly carry on the discourse. Nothing would be better.

    My purpose in writing is to foster conversation and discussion about issues that matter to Sikhs and Sikhi.

    Once again, thank you

    I.J. Singh, New York
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Admin Singh

    Admin Singh
    Expand Collapse
    Admin SPNer

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    5,973
    Likes Received:
    5,043
  6. Chaan Pardesi

    Chaan Pardesi
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    767
    IJ Singh JI, I apprieciate your response.Reading it from another angle, the absense of references, by you,in this very subject of Sikh History does imply, all the cards were not on the table.Who are those writers that claim this was a "defeat".I have not come across any.

    However, I understand what you trying say,sometimes to put one's foot like they say, into the hornets nest, does stir the hornets to buzz.I noted the buzz was not present, thus I tried to ignite the possible debate by sticking my foot into the hot and strong.

    I do share your sentiments at the many misrepresentations that go on.I do hope, you will now understand my taking a slight different path, to arouse discussion from more.I have written a small piece "Before Anandpur & Chamkaur and beyond" -and "At the battle of Chamkaur" i hope you will get to read it and offer your views too.Thank you again, Gurfateh, Copehagen
     
  7. Original

    Original
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    487
    Gentlemen

    The rendering of selfless service [nishkam seva] befalls the few. It is never the rightness or the wrongness of the seva in itself that determines its worthiness, but rather, the rendering. I'm delighted to have stopped by to give a glance to what appears to be a wonderful dialectic of an academic importance, notwithstanding of course, that it may be prejudicial to the actual event in question. All in all, I'm grateful that I J Singh have taken the time and the effort to capture both the seasonal fervour in its full swing [Xmas] and the Sikh martyerdom at Chamkaur Sahib to synchronistically savour the moment of its religious significance. Beautifully timed !

    The battle at Chamkaur Sahib was an epic of unporportional magnitude, an act of uncommon valour, analogous to the battles of the Spartans at Thermopylae and the Isralites of King Solomon against the mighty Egyptians centuries before. However, what is missing from I J Singh Ji's account at Chamkaur Sahib is the character of God. The numbered warriors were Amritdhari's. It was the Divine intervention, the invisible within the visible warriors on the day that stood testament to time memorial. That in my view is paramount because it's not always common sense or pure logic that tells the real story, but rather value judgment and aesthetic choice which offers emotional or other supposedly illogical factors as proper considerations. I J Singh Ji, I'm led to believe, is cut from that very cloth [Amritdhari] and to have subjectively narrated it thus would've done justice to the Sikh cause. The good, great, beautiful n the just God of Nanak was present through n through, hence, "sawa lake se ek laraoon tabe Gobind Singh, Singh nam kahaoon".

    Much obliged
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. swarn bains

    swarn bains United States
    Expand Collapse
    Poet SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    125
    ਨਾ ਕਹੂੰ ਅਬ ਕੀ ਨਾ ਕਹੂੰ ਤਬ ਕੀ,
    it is written alla yaar khan not bulleh shah
     
  9. Chaan Pardesi

    Chaan Pardesi
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    767
    A Moslem sufi poet Alla Yaar Khan of that period has rightly said,

    ਨਾ ਕੰਹੂ ਅਬ ਕੀ ਨਾ ਕੰਹੂ ਤਬ ਕੀ

    ਗਰ ਨਾ ਹੋਤੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ

    ਤੋ ਸੁਨੱਤ ਹੋਤੀ ਸਭ ਕੀ ਸੁਨੱਤ

    I dont say of now, nor say of then,
    But truth is, had the Guru
    not appeared, every body would have been
    circumcised and converted to islam.



    Indeed it was not Bulle shah, as oversightly written
     

Share This Page