Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!

India And Now, Fatwa Banning Photography as Un-Islamic

Discussion in 'Breaking News' started by Archived_Member16, Sep 11, 2013.

  1. Archived_Member16

    Archived_Member16
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,451
    Likes Received:
    3,761
    And Now, Fatwa Banning Photography as Un-Islamic

    Lamat R Hasan - New Delhi - Sep 11, 2013


    India's leading Islamic seminary Darul Uloom has issued a fatwa, saying "photography is unlawful and a sin", even though Saudi Arabia allows photographers inside the holy city of Mecca and live telecast of 'namaz' is beamed on Islamic channels across the world.

    Mufti Abdul Qasim Nomani, Mohtamim (Vice-Chancellor) of Darul Uloom Deoband, told PTI on phone, "Photography is un-Islamic. Muslims are not allowed to get their photos clicked unless it is for an identity card or for making a passport."

    He said Islam does not permit video-taping of marriages or clicking of pictures to save as mementos for future generations.

    When pointed out that Saudi Arabia, which follows the Wahabi school that aspires to return to the earliest fundamental sources of Islam, allows photography in the holiest of Islamic cities Mecca and beams live coverage through the year, Nomani said, "Let them do it. We do not allow it. Not everything they do is correct."

    Nomani agreed with the fatwa -- a religious edict issued by Darul Ifta in Deoband -- regarding a query from an engineering graduate saying he was passionate about photography and wanted to pursue it as a career.

    "Photography is unlawful and sin. Hadith (recorded Islamic tradition) warns sternly against it. Do not do this course. You should search any suitable job based on your engineering course," reads the fatwa posted on the school's website.

    All India Muslim Law Personal Board member Mufti Abul Irfan Qadri Razzaqi also agreed with Nomani's fatwa.

    "Islam forbids photographing of humans and animals. Whoever does that will be answerable to God," Razzaqi told PTI.

    When reminded that Saudis allow it, he said, "Just because they are richer than us doesn't mean they are also correct. If they are allowing photography they will be answerable on the Day of Judgement in the court of God."

    A similar fatwa was issued when a television reporter asked if his "facing the video camera" is against Islam.

    "You are right, it is prohibited in Islam to photograph and to let others photograph you. Therefore, you should seek forgiveness from Allah for the same and choose for you a work which is free from such prohibited acts.

    "A work which involves unlawful and haram things is obviously unlawful. If the work includes oral or written reporting as well then the entire income will not be labelled as haram," reads another fatwa.

    However, Mufti Saif Abbas, president of the Shia Chand Committee, said his sect allows photography and television viewing. "Islamic channels such as Peace TV, QTV, ARY and others beam live coverage of namaz, Hajj...Are they all wrong? I have argued with my Sunni colleagues that there is nothing wrong with photography," he said.

    source: http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=809669
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Loading...


  3. aristotle

    aristotle
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    2,654
    Wasn't it already deemed unlawful even before this fatwa?
    Anyways, not a bit surprised.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    Fatwa

    http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/fatwa.aspx#1-1G2:3424600948-full
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    Fatwas are nonbinding, legal opinions. They are issued at the request of Muslims who are seeking a ruling on a particular issue, and they are free to seek more than one opinion. There is considerable variation within the Muslim world regarding the force of a fatwa.

    Questions to ask about fatwa

    1. Was it issued by a person legally certified to give a fatwa?

    2. Who asked for it and what was his/her motivation? A fatwa typically is not issued spontaneously.

    3. Does the fatwa pertain to civil, marriage or inheritance matters? If it does not, then it is irrelevant to all but a group with a vested interest.

    4. Is the mufti who issues the fatwa speaking for all Islam? If he is, the fatwa has no legitimacy. A fatwa has no force beyond those who are somehow connected personally to the mufti.

    5. Is it possible that there is a political agenda associated with the fatwa? If that is true, then the fatwa carries no weight beyond the interests of agenda holders.

    it really is time for Muslims to start educating the rest of us on matters that are made to be controversial in illegitimate ways. For example, a fatwa issued in India has negligible importance in Saudi Arabia.

    There are real problems in this world related to inter-religious conflict; manufactured issues only complicate things.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #4 spnadmin, Sep 11, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2013
  6. aristotle

    aristotle
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    2,654
    In the book Al-I'laam bi naqd kitaab al-halaal wa'l-
    haraam, the author says: "Photography is even more of
    an imitation of the creation of Allaah than pictures
    which are engraved or drawn, so it is even more
    deserving of being prohibited… There is nothing that
    could exclude photography from the general meaning
    of the reports." (p. 42, see also Fataawa Islamiyyah,
    4/355).

    Among the scholars who have discussed the issue of
    photography is Shaykh Naasir al-Deen al-Albaani,
    who said: "Some of them differentiate between hand-
    drawn pictures and photographic images by claiming
    that the latter are not products of human effort, and
    that no more is involved than the mere capturing of the
    image. This is what they claim. The tremendous energy
    invested the one who invented this machine that can
    do in few seconds what otherwise could not be done
    in hours does not count as human effort, according to
    these people! Pointing the camera, focusing it, and
    taking the picture, preceded by installation of the film
    and followed by developing and whatever else that I
    may not know about. None of this is the result of
    human effort, according to them!"
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. spnadmin

    spnadmin United States
    Expand Collapse
    1947-2014 (Archived)
    SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    14,551
    Likes Received:
    19,200
    aristotle ji

    It still does not make any difference. The fatwa is binding only to those in India who sought an opinion. The article makes a weak effort to establish some sense of reality, by pointing out that in Saudi Arabia this fatwa has no relevance. Actually the fatwa is not binding on anyone, especially if it is not backed by the Quran and haddith. Which it cannot be because cameras did not exist at the time of Muhammed. The opinion of one mufti about "images" or "dogs" does not prove the truth of an opinion by another mufti.

    All that is served by the article is to give some publicity to something that is in truth a non-issue that can be manipulated to create hysterical responses and fan flames of inter-religious conflict.

    Today of all days!

    Today of all days - 9/11. And at this time in India when religious conflicts are stirred, often the result of efforts to polarize voters.

    If we can get our heads clear on what a fatwa is and what it is not, we will realize that perspective and a sense of proportion about these issues is needed to be rational. If we don't, then we are making a personal commitment to hysterics.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  8. Gyani Jarnail Singh

    Gyani Jarnail Singh Malaysia
    Expand Collapse
    Sawa lakh se EK larraoan
    Mentor Writer SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,623
    Likes Received:
    14,188
    FAtwas are like those our jathedars pass out....every now and then...practically valueless or about as valuable as the paper they a re printed on.:faujasingh:
     
    • Like Like x 3
    #7 Gyani Jarnail Singh, Sep 12, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 12, 2013
  9. Inderjeet Kaur

    Inderjeet Kaur
    Expand Collapse
    Writer SPNer Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    1,712
    OK, so Muslims can't have passports, driving licences, or, in fact, anything requiring a photograph. Sounds reasonable to me.

    I wonder when Islam will be declared un-Islamic?

    :icecreamkaur:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. aristotle

    aristotle
    Expand Collapse
    SPNer Contributor

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    2,654
    I hope some Muslim member could enlighten us on this. The topic of fatwas has always been a controversial one, only someone with first knowledge and experience of the Islamic society can fully appreciate the topic.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page