Welcome to SPN

Register and Join the most happening forum of Sikh community & intellectuals from around the world.

Sign Up Now!
  1. Guest ji, please consider donating today!
      Become a Supporter    ::   Make a Contribution   
    Monthly Recurring Target: $300 :: Achieved: $95

Access 2000 vs access 2002

Discussion in 'Information Technology' started by Ricoy-Chicago, Jul 28, 2006.

Tags:
  1. Ricoy-Chicago

    Ricoy-Chicago
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    All the files, (front-end and back-end) were created using Access 2000.
    Everything works fine. Is there any advantage by changing the files to 2002?
    Example: Access time will decrease, faster response? Network still uses
    windows NT 4.0 (I know, I know... but my IT guy and Admin have the mentality
    that "if ain't broken don't fix it")

    Just wondering, thanx.

    joel
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Norman Yuan

    Norman Yuan
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    1. Access2002 fixed some bugs in Access2000, I suppose (I do not know what
    they were, just, well, suppose), and may possibly introduced some new bugs.
    2. Better compatibility to SQL Server 2000, if you are to use it as SQL
    Server2000's front end. (Access2000 was released before SQL Server2000).

    But, if not broken, and no new features are required, why change it?

    "Ricoy-Chicago" <RicoyChicago@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    news:3118BDD0-3274-4D25-8755-8B3CC1B796AC@microsoft.com...
    > All the files, (front-end and back-end) were created using Access 2000.
    > Everything works fine. Is there any advantage by changing the files to
    > 2002?
    > Example: Access time will decrease, faster response? Network still uses
    > windows NT 4.0 (I know, I know... but my IT guy and Admin have the
    > mentality
    > that "if ain't broken don't fix it")
    >
    > Just wondering, thanx.
    >
    > joel
     
  4. Tony Toews

    Tony Toews
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Ricoy-Chicago <RicoyChicago@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

    >All the files, (front-end and back-end) were created using Access 2000.
    >Everything works fine. Is there any advantage by changing the files to 2002?
    >Example: Access time will decrease, faster response? Network still uses
    >windows NT 4.0 (I know, I know... but my IT guy and Admin have the mentality
    >that "if ain't broken don't fix it")


    I'd agree with Norman. Newer versions of Access won't be any faster.
    And A2000 through A2003 use Jet 4.0 so so long as you're up to date on
    the Jet patches that won't make any difference in corruptions.

    Now the next version of Access has lots of improvements to make life
    easier for the power user and for the developer. But that's a ways
    off. And won't run on NT 4.0.

    Tony
    --
    Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
    Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
    read the entire thread of messages.
    Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
    http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
     
Since you're here... we have a small favor to ask...

More people are visiting & reading SPN than ever but far fewer are paying to sustain it. Advertising revenues across the online media have fallen fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. Donating to SPN's is vote for free speech, for diversity of opinions, for the right of the people to stand up to religious bigotry. Without any affiliation to any organization, this constant struggle takes a lot of hard work to sustain as we entirely depend on the contributions of our esteemed writers/readers. We do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too... Fund our efforts and together we can keep the world informed about the real Sikh Sikhi Sikhism. If everyone who writes or reads our content, who likes it, helps us to pay for it, our future would be much more secure. Every Contribution Matters, Contribute Generously!

    Become a Supporter      ::     Make a Contribution     



Share This Page