One Infinite Creator in Sikhism, What Does it Mean?

Ambarsaria · #**145** (**permalink**) 01-May-2012, 23:45 PM

davinderdhanjal ji thanks for your post.

You may also be interested in the following thread as well,

http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurban...grammar-3.html
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/sikh-sikhi-sikhism/38210-one-infinite-creator-sikhism-what-does.html

Sat Sri Akal.
*

prakash.s.bagga · #**146** (**permalink**) 02-May-2012, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davinderdhanjal

Dear prakash.s.bagga Ji,
It is easier to understand and contribute with examples. “matra of Dulaikad is omitted without any reason. Whereas I found that the matra of Gulaikad is most important” I guess ‘Gulaikad’ is the same as ‘Dulaikad’ and means ‘ U’?
If that is so only example I could find easily were:
‘gur = igAwn dwqw, guru vwlw’
‘guru = mq dw clwx vwlw’
‘gurU = guru dw gurU’
‘swD = swDU, sMq’
‘swDu = sMq jn, swDy hoey, mWx vwlw@
‘swDU = auh mnuK ijs ny Awp nMU swD ilAw hovY’
Both are nouns but there may not be a set pattern that may be ascribed.
You may have more pertinent words that may be worthy of attention.

You can see message #23 where I have presented the classification of words according to matra of Aukad and Dulaikad as per Numbers these words represent.
Further you should also keep in mind that the Words are also classified according to GENDER as Masculine/Feminine and Neutral .

We can find use of the words in Gurbanee according to Gender as well as According to Numbers depending upon the context of application.

The application of the words is according to Genders for reference to person/persons otherwise the application is as per Numbers.

Prakash.s.Bagga

prakash.s.bagga · #**147** (**permalink**) 02-May-2012, 14:48 PM

DAVENDERDHANJAL JI,
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=38210

The message #23 is in the thread of Gurbanee grammar currenly you can visit this.
Prakash.s.Bagga

prakash.s.bagga · #**148** (**permalink**) 03-May-2012, 13:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davinderdhanjal

Dear prakash.s.bagga Ji,
It is easier to understand and contribute with examples. “matra of Dulaikad is omitted without any reason. Whereas I found that the matra of Gulaikad is most important” I guess ‘Gulaikad’ is the same as ‘Dulaikad’ and means ‘ U’?
If that is so only example I could find easily were:
‘gur = igAwn dwqw, guru vwlw’
‘guru = mq dw clwx vwlw’
‘gurU = guru dw gurU’
‘swD = swDU, sMq’
‘swDu = sMq jn, swDy hoey, mWx vwlw@
‘swDU = auh mnuK ijs ny Awp nMU swD ilAw hovY’
Both are nouns but there may not be a set pattern that may be ascribed.
You may have more pertinent words that may be worthy of attention.

You are right but what do you think about the reference meanings of these three words.? Do these words convey the same reference meanings or different.?
Prakash.s.Bagga

davinderdhanjal · #**149** (**permalink**) 03-May-2012, 15:52 PM

prakash.s.bagga Ji,
Please add some informative content so we can share learning. I am not sure that what I said is what you understand and vice versa. An answer with some content may be helpful.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=38210
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=38210
I will move to the other site as per Ambarsaria Ji link to add more content.