Same-sex marriage... By RAMANDEEP KAUR GREWAL and T. SHER SINGH

BhagatSingh · #19 (**permalink**) 22-Jul-2006, 10:57 AM

i dont know of any animals as mentioned in my previous post

humans marrying animals ok now thats very unnatural <-- we shud be against this but again we have to accept it at the same time
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/sikh-news/1697-same-sex-marriage-ramandeep-kaur-grewal.html
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697
humans using animals to satisfy their lust .. ok i think it shud keep them from raping other humans because rapes occur due to lust
*

CaramelChocolate · #20 (**permalink**) 22-Jul-2006, 15:06 PM

Oh sorry I thought you were trying to say you do not know of any homosexual animals but you know some animals in general or something.

Accepting homosexuality DOES NOT open other avenues such as rape, paedophilia and beastiality. These things should never be accepted by any society because of the issue of consent.

Like I have said previously not all morality or rules can be generalised. It is like telling a paralysed muslim from the neck down to pray salah like every other Muslim. So just because someone may agree that being gay is morally acceptable, does not mean everyone should be gay. Accepting homosexuality does not even mean you accept premarital relations or promiscuity. Morality is about principle, and if you want to you can believe that homosexuals should have sex within a same-sex marriage only.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697

I am not going to comment on the issue anymore of what is unnatural is immoral.

Singh Balbir · #21 (**permalink**) 25-Jul-2006, 18:38 PM

How to avoid the rape of animals? In future govts./courts may be forced to formulate some laws for it also. In my views, AIDs & other chronical diseases are the outcome of unnatural acts of human beings. "What is unnatural is immoral" - I fully agree. Opposite sex marriage is not unnatural because this is acceptable under all circumstances. However, what will happen if all becomes gay?

sardaul · #22 (**permalink**) 25-Jul-2006, 21:26 PM

No animal is homosexual.That is a fact. It's only humain being doing notorious things.

CaramelChocolate · #23 (**permalink**) 25-Jul-2006, 23:36 PM

Balbir Singh you are not reading my posts properly. I am arguing AGAINST natural law.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697
Nature = Morality... I am DISAGREEING with this. Infact I even repasted that whole post for a second time for you on this thread.

You asked 'what if all becomes gay', yet again you have not read any of my replies. I said previously.. Like I have said previously not all morality or rules can be generalised. It is like telling a paralysed muslim from the neck down to pray salah like every other Muslim. So just because someone may agree that being gay is morally acceptable, does not mean everyone should be gay. Accepting homosexuality does not even mean you accept premarital relations or promiscuity. Morality is about principle, and if you want to you can believe that homosexuals should have sex within a same-sex marriage only.

Sardaul - I would appreciate replies based on comments already given on the thread, can you please give me evidence for your claims. It is clear you haven't read this thread as evidence that there are animal homosexuals exist. /www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NG3N4RAV41.DTL
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697
I would be interested to see evidence that contradicts this.

BhagatSingh · #24 (**permalink**) 26-Jul-2006, 07:16 AM

ur rite but i see where Balbir Singh is coming from... what if everyone becomes gay? think about it

Ishna · #25 (**permalink**) 26-Jul-2006, 08:38 AM

It's not a disease, you can't catch "gayness".

And the likelyhood of everyone "becoming gay" is about as likely as everyone becoming Sikh, or everyone dying their hair black, or everyone getting their nose pierced, or everyone riding Ducatis, or everyone liking sushi.

You don't generally see homosexual people "becoming straight" because there are millions more people who are straight. In the same way people won't "become gay" because that is how a group of people want to live their lives.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697

Now, in the incredibally unlikely event that everyone WAS to become gay... then I guess that would be God's will. :P

Randip Singh · #26 (**permalink**) 02-Aug-2006, 18:51 PM

I think some of the views here are incredibly biggoted....and just plain sick in other circumstances.

Here are examples of homosexual behaviour in the animal Kingdom:

http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Animal_sexuality

The person above has rightly stated, homosexuality is not something you catch.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=1697

Here is an article about the Gay Gene being pssed on:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3735668.stm

Now if we accept waheguru made us, he must have made this Gay gene to. Not everyone has it, but some do. Learn to accept them and keep your biggoted views out of Sikhism.

Thanks