Recent content by J.A.T.T

Or those people will end up following some other religion instead.

Yes, I guess.

I mean any Sikh who is Punjabi.

It may have to do with the Punjabi culture. Most "Sikhs" I have come across in the past can't tell the difference between Punjabi culture & Sikhi. They think it is the same thing. :{-(:

No, he wasn't an amritdhari. Please check these links out: Great Sikh martyrs Sikh Martyrs:Bhai Haqiqat Rai Bhai Haqiqat Rai He is refer as Bhai Haqiqat Rai according to those SIKH websites.

When exactly did he take amrit before becoming a martyr?

No, it's Haqiqat Rai. He was not an amritdhari. He was just a believer of the Sikh faith.

His name is Haqiqat Rai

Well in that case, the Sikh community needs to stop taking credit of non-Sikhs like Shaheed Udham Singh and Shaheed Bhagat Singh. This also means that Sikhs never ruled Punjab since Maharaja Ranjit Singh wasn't a Sikh. And if you look at other religions, then you will realize their definition...

Shaheed Bhagat Singh was the man! He is one of the few people I look up to. People claiming Bhagat Singh as a terrorist don't even know what they're talking about.

NICE! Thanks for posting this quote. :up:

But aren't all Amritdharis are bunch of scary cats anyway? :rofl!!: Makes you wonder if these so called "Singhs" should even deserve to wear a Kirpan.

Huh? Jatt were more than just a farmer class. Do a little history research to see how powerful Jatts were especially during after Khalsa was created. Anyway, thanks for your input on this topic. :)

Umm I find it funny how you search "caste" on Wikipedia instead of Jatt. "The Jat people (IAST: Jāṭ, Hindi: जाट, Punjabi: ਜੱਟ جاٹ, Urdu: جاٹ‎) of Northern India and Pakistan, are descendants of Indo-Aryan/Indo-Scythian tribes.[1] [2] [3] Jats were designated in a British report as a...

Because I am a Punjabi Jatt. :D Besides, what does being a Jatt have to do with Hinduism?