Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and The Sikhs!!

Forty-seven head of states gathered in the capital of the United States of America to participate in the Nuclear Security Summit which began on April 12. India's Chief, Council of Ministers, Manmohan Singh met the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Mr. Singh specifically advised his Canadian counterpart Harper to suppress the Sikhs, who are separatists [reflects that he is not a Sikh]. What a strange thing that Manmohan Singh, a Sikh himself, is suggesting the Canadian Prime Minister that the Sikhs are separatists. Does Mr. Singh, supposedly a clean and honest person in the eyes of the head of states of our world and the international news media, like to tell his other head of states of the Nuclear Summit, tell that he himself is not a democratically elected Prime Minister of India.
Rather, he is a 'selected or handpicked person by a handful and president of the Congress party of his country. He has not been elected by the electorates of any constituency of the Indian parliament. A non-elected and a selected person by his master, Sonia Gandhi, and the opponents of Sonia Gandhi's parliamentarian colleagues, I did not have any choice but to accept the offer of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' parliamentarians, because none of them was capable to become the Chief, Council of Ministers, the New Delhi administration, due to their in-fighting as reflected several times in the 'Brahmins-Hindus' parliament, known as the Lok Sabha or the Lower House of the 'Brahmins-Hindus alleged Indian democracy'.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/india/31162-indian-prime-minister-manmohan-singh-sikhs.html
Resultantly, the Indian parliamentarians could not find a democratically elected person by the Indian voters. What a strange functioning of the Indian democracy, the democracy of the 'Brahmins-Hindus', who have been masters for the practice of the shameless apartheid, devious, divisive, criminal and deceitful people.
Mr. Singh's calling the Sikhs as 'separatists' is quite a strange example of the morally impotent and corrupt parliamentarians, which is not any 'unusual' happening as far as the 'Brahmins-Hindus' law-makers are concerned. Would Mr. Singh answers to the Sikh Diaspora and their fellow heads of the international community that the 'unelected' 'Brahmins-Hindus' leadership did not 'robb' the Sikhs of Punjab, the Sikh Nation, the First Secular and Sovereign State of South Asia, from 1799 to 14th March, 1849? The Sikhs have been 'struggling to regain their sovereignty, independence and political power, which was surrendered to no one else but the British Empire on 14th March, 1849.
The unelected 'Brahmins-Hindus' politicians, after regaining their independence, made the Sikhs of Punjab a *'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB*' on 15th August, 1947. Why Mr. Singh is telling his Canadian counterpart that the Sikhs are separatists? This is just because the Sikhs have been made a 'Landless Nation, devoid of their constitutional rights, and they have 'swallowed' the Sikh religion, and made it a 'sect' of the Hindus and their -ism. It should not be overlooked that the 'Hindus are neither a religion nor a culture'; whereas, the Sikhs are the fifth largest religion of the world.
Mr. Singh should make it clear that he did not lie to the members of the Commission of the United Nations Human Rights, Vienna, Austria, 15-25th August, 1993, that he then Finance Minister of the P V Rao administration said: "I being a Sikh find no abuse of Human Rights of Sikhs much less any minorities in India." His statement was refuted in the strongest possible word by the Sikhs of the Europe and North America, who had been participating and attending the Human Rights Commission.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=31162
The fact remains that Manmohan Singh, being an unelected member of the Indian parliament, is merely a Chief, Council of Ministers, to serve the 'Brahmins-Hindus' of India. As such, he has been acting as a mouthpiece of his Brahmins-Hindus masters, to please them as well as acting against the 'Facts of the South Asian history' and to brand the Sikhs separatists, like his cabinet colleague, Kamal Nath, who had been visiting Canada in March/April, 2010. Interestingly, the latter has been summoned to appear before a Court of Justice in the United States for 'committing crimes against humanity'.
Mr. Singh, being the assistant to the then Home Minister in 1984, P V Rao, has also committed crimes against the Sikhs by not telling his role in a brutal military "Operation Bluestar" of June, 1984, in which Indian armed forces had taken a toll of more than 250,000 innocent Sikhs.


Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and The Sikhs!!

 
Do share your immediate thoughts or reactions on this issue? We value your views! Login Now! or Sign Up Today! to share your views with us.. Gurfateh!

__________________
Our Gurus have taught us to value every single life. Bhai Kanhaiyaa's message was that we should connect with all of humanity. Our tradition teaches us to stand up to every injustice.

Vikram singh Ji ,
This article is a trap which will be used to divide Sikhs ( may I suggest persons within Congress itself ) , no doubt Manmohan Singh Ji is a person who specifically asked Sikhs to get over 1984 forget about it . ( IMHO which is due to the involvement of Indira in Bluestar & Rajeev Gandhi in Nov genocide both a RAW NERVE FOR SONIA personally ) He has to work with ( under ) Sonia that is why he is bound to respect her opinion , feelings or ORDER say whatever you like . BUT HE IS THE BRIGHTEST ROLE MODEL FOR SIKHS TODAY . He is more interested in giving Sikhs a POSITIVE IMAGE through hard work , their belief of CHARDI KALA ( always hopeful ) , positive outlook for the future . Remember Guru Gobind Singh Ji patched up with Emperor Farikassur whose father Aurangzeb martyred his father Guru Teg Bahadur . Sikhs always made friends with those who mend their ways . In that way Sonia is perhaps much different from Rajeev & Indira also she has her core constituency of minorities to look upto not HARDCORE HINDUS who have shifted loyalities to BJP ( RSS ) since 1984 anyway . This does not mean that Sikhs should stop demanding justice , it is just that they ensure that they play their cards right . Extract concessions from Congress like Amendment to article 25 ( B) , enactment of Anand Marriage Act , more reservations for Sikhs in Military Services etc etc . In addition keep up the pressure so that the Government at least does what it can do heal the wounds of 1984 like punishing Tyltler , Sajjan Kumar , Small thugs , Amitabh Bachan ( who is anyway not on good terms with gandhis now ) Police officers all & sundry whatever is possible ensuring more compensation for the victims . Manmohan Singh ji is perhaps three four more years in office . Sikhs must make use of this chance because it is a never before never again opportunity , keep their senses in check & do whatever can be done . Once we lose this chance , we will keep repenting upon it afterwards .

It will be interesting topics,Dalbirk ji,

I don't agree with it. How is he the brightest role model?He was Giver PM ship because he
is not politician so he is not a threat to Gandhi family.Now just look at Narsimha Rao because he is dead ever blame whether it is non action on 84 ,bhopal tragedy or babri demolition is put on him so No blame could be put on Rajiv.

As economist from past 6 years Manmohan has done nothing for pooraccept a helicopter scheme LIKe NREGA .Inflation especially of food items is on sky high.He is just PM because
Rahul at present is not ready to accept the post of PM.May be after 10 -20 years congress
could make Manmohan another scapegoat for mismanagement of UPA-1 OR 2 on manmohan
and will say that Sonia and Rahul are totally clean

Dalbirk Ji,I want to discuss this topic,but i am so busy, with my work ,atleast for a week,but i have lot of fact and figures regarding Sikh discrimination in India, and i will get back to you as soon as possible, I hope it will be good discussion.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=31162

Thanks
Vikram singh

Everyone has a right to ones opinion.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=31162
However, the following needs to be set straight:
1. what manmohan Singh said was that some Sikhs residing outside India, especially in Canada support separatists.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=31162
2. Manmohan Singh was not an assistant of PV Narashima Rao in 1984. He was the Governor of Reserve Bank of India. (India's Central Bank)

Manmohan Singh has always tried to put 84 issue under carpet, proving himself as traitor.

Our war is not against any religion or caste. We are fighting for justice and truth and against tyranny. The government regards it as crime. Our war is not against any particular section; it is against the Perpetrators of 1984. It is human nature that every one wants to live. This is true. But this is equally true of human nature that rather than living a long life in ignominy and abjection, one may choose to live for a short time, holding one’s head high and fighting to end the state of slavery.

Indian Prime Minister Mr Manmohan Singh is a rubber stamp token minority who call himself in his own words " an accidental PM" who can't even prosecute people in his own cabinet witnessed and filmed by journalist while leading murderous mobs against sikhs, No one is talking about or demanding Khalistan here,just proseccution of those politicians. This whole anti-sikh hysteria and propaganda in Canda by India agents like some in politics and journalism is the direct result of legal action that is being taken by Canada and US based sikhs against these men in Indian court not that its going to get anywhere but they are trying and that has deeply disturbed the Govt of Indai and its supporters in Canada that the truth might come out,and world will know about Indian Democracy