Kapii ji,
Guru Fateh.
You seem a bit agitated for the reasons only known to you. It is ok to disagree and sometimes a must. The only way for you to have an intelligent interaction is to produce your counter arguments, not just gripe about the things.
Allow me to dissect your post so I can understand what you are trying to say.
You write:
Quote:
|
I mean think about who the heck cares??? If Hinduism == Sikhism or not??
|
I do care as a Sikh. Hinduism is as much to do with Sikhism as Judaism to Islam.
Quote:
|
Thing is, in hinduism there were so many shortcomings (Like casteism etc), that is why a new religion popped up (Sikhism). A lot of hindus got attracted towards it.
|
Casteism is not a shortcoming. That is a very soft word. Casteism is worse than Apartheid that once flourished in South Africa and now what is Zimbabave. So, as a Hindu, do not take this lightly with a shrug. Humanity demands that from you.
Many were attracted to Sikhs NOT because of the caste system only. Please read your own history to find out other factors.
Quote:
|
But at the same time, we hindus ( I am saying "we", coz i am one), were tolerant enough to let another religion come up.
|
You seem like an articulate person. I am sure you are aware that
tolerance breeds disdain and hatred. It is not a good trait to have.
Sikhi teaches acceptance of ALL, no exception. That is why Harmandir Sahib has 4 doors to welcome all and the practical tradition of equality through Langer and Pangat.
Quote:
|
In fact, 99% of sikhs had Hindu ancestors (even more than that). Can you imagine an off-shoot from Islam??? Think about Ahamdeiiyyas, and then answer.
|
Now, you are contradicting your prior statement of Hindus being tolerant and then coming into the fold of Sikhi. It makes little sense.
I am glad Hindus realised that their own religion was not attracted to them and Sikhi had more to offer than Hindusim.
As mentioned before, if I take your argument then Islam is an off shoot of Judaism and Christianity which is not true either. I have no idea why you are trying to justify something which makes no sense.
Quote:
|
There is no point of comparing two religions. Sikhism is the newest religion and Hinduism the oldest.
|
One more weak argument coming from someone who has no idea what he is talking about. You are the one who is comparing. That was part of your whole argument. Age has nothing to do with a religion. It is in the value system.
Got some more?