Answering Hindus

amar_jkp · #1 (**permalink**) 03-Mar-2007, 21:01 PM

I need help to answer hindus fanatics , just see what they are wrighting

HINDUSIKH.myfastforum.org :: DIVIDING SIKHISM FROM HINDUISM
HINDUSIKH.myfastforum.org :: Guru Ravidass-The FIRST GURU?
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hinduism/15060-answering-hindus.html

Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=15060
pls visit this site to answer them

----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
*

kaur-1 · #2 (**permalink**) 03-Mar-2007, 21:13 PM

Amar_jkp ji, There is quite a bit of info on this website link. Sikh Articles - Sikhism vs. Hinduism

badmash · #3 (**permalink**) 03-Mar-2007, 21:16 PM

Nothing too bad here. What do you expect from Hindustanis? Eaters of muslim and angrezi joothay for 1000 years? Obviously, mis statements are there, and points of view abound. But I would ignore it.

amar_jkp · #4 (**permalink**) 03-Mar-2007, 22:59 PM

Dont ignore these things judt visit their site u will see more

badmash · #5 (**permalink**) 04-Mar-2007, 00:35 AM

Are we such [****] now that we pay attention to hindu propaganda? There is no arguing or convincing fools or fanatics.

kds1980 · #6 (**permalink**) 04-Mar-2007, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amar_jkp

Dont ignore these things judt visit their site u will see more

first of all stop posting on those sites.the more you post the more popularity
that site will gain.

btw if you still want to post the here is my point on the topic of guru ravidass

show them the following quote from guru granth sahib.

नानकि राजु चलाइआ सचु कोटु सताणी नीव दै ॥
naanak raaj chalaa-i-aa sach kot sataanee neev dai.
Nanak established the kingdom; He built the true fortress on the strongest foundations.

on ang 966

also tell them that baba farid was a muslim who beleived in mohammed
as last prophet.now if they accept baba farid ji as their guru then all of them should embrace islam.are they ready for it?

badmash · #7 (**permalink**) 04-Mar-2007, 10:39 AM

Yeah, and who is going to listen exactly? Thus my point.

Shahryar · #8 (**permalink**) 05-Mar-2007, 17:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by badmash

Nothing too bad here. What do you expect from Hindustanis? Eaters of muslim and angrezi joothay for 1000 years? Obviously, mis statements are there, and points of view abound. But I would ignore it.

If you know your history you would know that the sikhs also were subdued by the British and subsequently worked for them.

Who do you think helped the British subdue the last Muslim uprising against the Brits in 1857? The Sikhs!

badmash · #9 (**permalink**) 05-Mar-2007, 17:54 PM

Yeah, but at least we stood up and fought! Who took Peshawar, Multan and Lahore after 8-9 centuries of Muslim rule? What other ***** force besides the british had ever rode into Kabul? So, point being that there was a difference, the difference being that the sikhs actually achieved something against the Mullahs whereas the rest of India (read hindus) are mostly about talk and Shivaji,etc, etc. Even the proud and handsome rajputs had to marry off into the Mughals to save themselves, and no one else ever dreamed of bringing back the doors of Somnath to India. History is clear to most on this forum, and also, british subjugation was not all bad. It is the reason most of us are posting on this forum, otherwise likely a mere fraction of punjab today would be educated, and we would likely still be riding on carts and horses in the punjab on dusty old dirt tracks. Most of us would also be sitting back in punjab, without the benefits of emigration that employment under the british started. As for 1857, that topic has been discussed elsewhere. The sikhs were loyal.