
02-Mar-2011, 00:10 AM
|  | | | | Enrolled: May 8th, 2010
Posts: 190
| |
Liked 109 Times in 70 Posts
| | | | | Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? It just struck me that we are only the 8th largest religion in the World and yet we are the most divided.
We are divided so heavily into so many different groups that it is a true poison for Sikhs
Not only are you divided by caste (I know it does not exist) but it has been enforced so heavily by British rule that we have never got rid of it
You can find article on how the British divided people by martial ability and the abilty to fight seems to be the predominant factor in ranking Sikhs by caste Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/34682-sikhs-small-numbers-but-sikhs-most.html
Farmers had stronger builds due to ploughing the land and others due to trading occupations had less rugged build and therefore not really suited to the army (fighting)
Having said that, there is no reason why non-Jatts cannot be conditioned to have athletic bodies and more so now everyone sits behind a computer so naturually regardless of caste you probably end up obesse if you do not exercise and most probably people do not farm in the West Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=34682
If we look at Western society, they are not divided like Sikhs in terms of caste, turban wearing, non-turban wearing, trimmed etc etc
I just feel that caste is not relevant at all and divisions amongst us when we are in such small numbers is not good.
Also counting too much on past achievments of ancestors does not automatically give you right to express rank in a caste when most probably you do not reflect the same characteristics as your ancestors
Soon, in the UK we are having Gurudwara elections and no party has proposed to eradicate caste, remove caste based gurudwaras, consolidate the SIkhs and fly high!
Do share your immediate thoughts or reactions on this issue? We value your views! Login Now! or Sign Up Today! to share your views with us.. Gurfateh! | 
02-Mar-2011, 01:01 AM
|  | (previously Kanwardeep Singh) | | | Enrolled: Apr 4th, 2005 Location: INDIA Age: 31
Posts: 4,271
| |
Liked 2,403 Times in 1,244 Posts
| | | | | re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote: |
It just struck me that we are only the 8th largest religion in the World and yet we are the most divided
| What make's you think we are most divided? The other Religions too have severe divisions.After creation of Pakistan west pakistani's were severely fighting with east pakistani 's in which lakhs were killed .Hindu's too are severely divided.A North Indian Punjabi Hindu feel much more comfortable with sikh rather than a south Indian hindu.If you visit sites like rediff you will find Hindu's severely mocking each other from different parts of India | | The following member appreciates kds1980 Ji for the above message. | | 
02-Mar-2011, 01:08 AM
|  | | | | Enrolled: May 8th, 2010
Posts: 190
| |
Liked 109 Times in 70 Posts
| | | | | re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote:
Originally Posted by kds1980 What make's you think we are most divided? The other Religions too have severe divisions.After creation of Pakistan west pakistani's were severely fighting with east pakistani 's in which lakhs were killed .Hindu's too are severely divided.A North Indian Punjabi Hindu feel much more comfortable with sikh rather than a south Indian hindu.If you visit sites like rediff you will find Hindu's severely mocking each other from different parts of India |
You missedd the point..... we are not suppose to be divided, our religion says we are not suppose to follow caste, Hinduism says to follow caste - see the difference?
I think it was Chamars banned from going to Amritsar by Jatts - what kind of rubbish was that?
WHat good is caste today if majority of people in the West work like puppets under someone in a company anyway?
Most people these days are just puppets and then to call your self superiour or less superious is just load of rubbish
In the West we are on a level playing field but yet most have not been able to get rid of the caste labels
Caste just does not make sense to me and also just out of interest I am wondering why Hindus themselves do not stand up against caste in this modern World, or do they? | 
02-Mar-2011, 01:21 AM
|  | (previously Kanwardeep Singh) | | | Enrolled: Apr 4th, 2005 Location: INDIA Age: 31
Posts: 4,271
| |
Liked 2,403 Times in 1,244 Posts
| | | | | re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote: |
You missedd the point..... we are not suppose to be divided, our religion says we are not suppose to follow caste, Hinduism says to follow caste - see the difference?
| Even Muslims have very strong concept of islamic brotherhood yet they have been discriminating Black muslims from ages.Theory and practice are very different .In theory Sikhs should treat all Sikhs as equal but with time they developed caste system | | The following member appreciates kds1980 Ji for the above message. | | 
02-Mar-2011, 01:30 AM
|  | | | | Enrolled: May 8th, 2010
Posts: 190
| |
Liked 109 Times in 70 Posts
| | | | | re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote:
Originally Posted by kds1980 Even Muslims have very strong concept of islamic brotherhood yet they have been discriminating Black muslims from ages.Theory and practice are very different .In theory Sikhs should treat all Sikhs as equal but with time they developed caste system | What exactly does caste do in 2011 in a Western World? I can perhaps see that if living in India you may still be subjected to any treatment but what benefit do we get out of caste today?
Is it simply not to mix?
I cannot see any genetic attributes one may have that they would want to preseve as in Hitlers ideology of blondes with blue eyes only
Is this not a type of racism?
Or is it a matter of numbers of each caste group, so if we reduce the 66% Jatt advantage to say 33% and increase other more influential groups then we got a level playing field? Is it just a numbers game that leads to a pwer struggle? | 
02-Mar-2011, 02:22 AM
|  | (previously Kanwardeep Singh) | | | Enrolled: Apr 4th, 2005 Location: INDIA Age: 31
Posts: 4,271
| |
Liked 2,403 Times in 1,244 Posts
| | | | | Re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote:
Originally Posted by badshah What exactly does caste do in 2011 in a Western World? I can perhaps see that if living in India you may still be subjected to any treatment but what benefit do we get out of caste today?
Is it simply not to mix?
I cannot see any genetic attributes one may have that they would want to preseve as in Hitlers ideology of blondes with blue eyes only
Is this not a type of racism?
Or is it a matter of numbers of each caste group, so if we reduce the 66% Jatt advantage to say 33% and increase other more influential groups then we got a level playing field? Is it just a numbers game that leads to a pwer struggle? |
Well you are living in west so you can answer this question better.I just want to repeat what I said in one of my earlier post that many of Fundamentalist movements in South Asia were/are funded and promoted by people that were/are living west rather than those living South Asia.RSS/BJP gets lot of funds from NRI hindu's Khalistani's got lot of support Sikhs outside India,LTTE got support much from Tamils living in west rather than tamils of India.Muslims too fund their movements.similarly sites like jattworld are operated from west.
90% of its members are living in west.So someone needs to study Why [people in west become more fundamental whether about of religion or caste. | 
02-Mar-2011, 02:32 AM
|  | | | | Enrolled: May 8th, 2010
Posts: 190
| |
Liked 109 Times in 70 Posts
| | | | | Re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote:
Originally Posted by kds1980 Well you are living in west so you can answer this question better.I just want to repeat what I said in one of my earlier post that many of Fundamentalist movements in South Asia were/are funded and promoted by people that were/are living west rather than those living South Asia.RSS/BJP gets lot of funds from NRI hindu's Khalistani's got lot of support Sikhs outside India,LTTE got support much from Tamils living in west rather than tamils of India.Muslims too fund their movements.similarly sites like jattworld are operated from west.
90% of its members are living in west.So someone needs to study Why [people in west become more fundamental whether about of religion or caste. | Your response is flawed because it suggest the that an entire group is required to fund activities from the West to East. For example to run Jattworld does not require the entire Jatt population to run that site, it can be run by one person
Similarly to fund fundemenalist activities does not take an entire group to do that either, it could be a couple of people siphoning off Gurudwara funds or some wealthy individuals funding
Also even if being funded from outside India, the main "doers" are within india so I am not sure what you are trying to say? | 
02-Mar-2011, 02:48 AM
|  | ੴ / Ik▫oaʼnkār | | | Enrolled: Dec 21st, 2010
Posts: 2,719
| |
Liked 3,956 Times in 1,897 Posts
| | | | | Re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote:
Originally Posted by badshah Your response is flawed because it suggest the that an entire group is required to fund activities from the West to East. For example to run Jattworld does not require the entire Jatt population to run that site, it can be run by one person
Similarly to fund fundemenalist activities does not take an entire group to do that either, it could be a couple of people siphoning off Gurudwara funds or some wealthy individuals funding
Also even if being funded from outside India, the main "doers" are within india so I am not sure what you are trying to say? | badshah ji take the chip of your shoulder a bit. Are you affected by so called division and based on your tones I assume it is negatively affected you. I am sorry on behalf of the Sikh panth for your hurt.
What a mis-leading "Thread Title". Sikhs don't have castes they have clans/creeds. There is a huge difference. Clans are respectful of their cultural heritage (language, social networking, common interests in life subjects) and lifestyles more than anything else. They may get a superiority complex but that goes with the territory as soon as more than one person creates a group. No group will say they are mee too and will justify their qualities while showing deficiencies of others.
It is a basic need in Humans to associate. The most favorable associations are where they don't have to make many assumptions and are not in a "la La Land" of unknowns. Say you and I may belong to different Clans and our thoughts and dealings may be different as a result. Hypothetically I may have a superiority complex (condascending write-ups focussing on commonalities) and you may have an inferiority complex (defensive write-ups focusing on differences) and vice versa.
Sikhism teaches us that " each one is unique and same" at the same time. One cannot have a better guiding concept as a guiding light.
Sat Sri Akal. | 
02-Mar-2011, 02:51 AM
|  | (previously Kanwardeep Singh) | | | Enrolled: Apr 4th, 2005 Location: INDIA Age: 31
Posts: 4,271
| |
Liked 2,403 Times in 1,244 Posts
| | | | | Re: Sikhs Are Small in Numbers. But Are Sikhs Most Divided by Caste? Quote:
Originally Posted by badshah Your response is flawed because it suggest the that an entire group is required to fund activities from the West to East. For example to run Jattworld does not require the entire Jatt population to run that site, it can be run by one person
Similarly to fund fundemenalist activities does not take an entire group to do that either, it could be a couple of people siphoning off Gurudwara funds or some wealthy individuals funding
Also even if being funded from outside India, the main "doers" are within india so I am not sure what you are trying to say? | I am not saying an entire group is required to fund but still 1 or 2 indivisuals cannot fund an entire movement.I used to read posts on old jatt world and their was hardly any jatt from India on that site.Almost all were from west so site may be created an individual but those who were contribuiting were from west.
What i was trying to say was reply to your question that What caste is doing in west.May be in west people become insecure about their identity whether it is Religious or caste based so that could be one of the reason they choose to become castist.It is just What I am assuming may me I am wrong. | 
Support Us! Become a Promoter! | | Gurfateh ji, you can become a SPN Promoter by Donating as little as $10 each month. With limited resources & high operational costs, your donations make it possible for us to deliver a quality website and spread the teachings of the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, to serve & uplift humanity. Every contribution counts. Donate Generously. Gurfateh! | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Tools | Search | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | | » Gurbani Jukebox | Listen to Gurbani while surfing SPN! | » Active Discussions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ਨਾਮਾ Yesterday 11:06 AM 0 Replies, 30 Views | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | » Books You Should Read... | | | |