A Fighter speaks to you

Dear Sikh fellows,

I am a Fighter of the West, that is, of Western Civilisation, which is beset by enemies within and without seeking its destruction wittingly and unwittingly. The West, its Church called Christendom, its Classical Humanist culture, and the racial substrate for its accomplishment, namely the white Race, are, along with the principle of Heterosexuality itself, under total ideological attack, and not long for the world if I cannot rally sufficient comrades and allies to its cause.

I come to you, then, as I referenced a year ago I would, as a white man, with faith in Christ alone, engaged in a Culture War to defend and advance Classical Humanism, Christendom, my racial blood, and Holy Matrimony against the array of enemies: Anglo-Dutch Liberalism, Political Correctness, masses of unassimilable displaced persons ("immigrants"), the controlled Mass Media, and others.

I post here because I wish to understand you better. You have a warrior tradition and this is valuable. You strive to be upstanding before your Creator and have cultivated noble ritual to assist in this. You are not my comrades, but, I hope to convince you of the necessity that the West not fall into darkness and dissolution, that if it does the consequences for the world will be untenable. I hope that you will become my allies.

There is War ongoing, a Culture War, and it needs real fighters just as much as any Shooting War needs them. We can no long afford to bicker quietly across our computer screens about the "issues" of the day's events, as if these things had no continuity with our practical lives. We must get serious, and consider how to strategically orchestrate cultural change, in the window of time left to us, or else we are faithless, are we not?
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/hard-talk/18517-a-fighter-speaks-to-you.html

I beg your courtesy and response.

In good faith,

h

Damn Political Correctness, cultivate Racial Correctness

In practice, Racial Correctness operates on three principles:

1. Fearlessness to discuss reality, to the limits of one’s ability and the tolerance (load limit) of one’s audience. Emotionalism is to be avoided, as emotionalism is an expression of despair. When in doubt, instead of despairing, think. Despair inclines towards death, thought towards truth.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=18517

2. Conservative confidence, where one acknowledges that one possesses a constellation of doubts on how to save the West, and even what is worth saving, but that the essential shining ideas cannot be ignored, anymore than existential threats to one’s family, country, race, or civilisation can be ignored. In the darkness, ideas become like stars to navigate by, and so find new stars. The mistake is in flying directly into a star.

3. The recognition that anyone can act Racially Correct, and that everyone should. Regardless of whether specific interest groups exercise their rights to control their membership, anyone who displays the courage to debate reality in good faith, and a sensible grasp of his own ignorance, is acting Racially Correct, and acting is all that matters. Attacking someone who is acting Racially Correct as not meriting that distinction due to his not being otherwise desirable is a Politically Correct thing to do.

 
Do share your immediate thoughts or reactions on this issue? We value your views! Login Now! or Sign Up Today! to share your views with us.. Gurfateh!

Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=18517

is this a joke???

My opinion -- it is not a joke. What helgasdogs is stating is completely consistent with the neo-conservative opinions of the political far right in the United States, Europe, and other countries.

well i'm going to guess that my "racial incorrectness" is so abhorent to that person that my help is not being requested.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=18517
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=18517

i haven't been called a "race traitor" yet, but if this guy's behavior is really indicitive of conservative america, i expect the insults to begin rolling in at any moment.

Dear kelly and aad,

Why would anyone want to be racially incorrect? Are you telling me you actively wish to avoid discussing uncomfortable reality, that you cultivate overconfidence in your received opinions, and that you don't mind being a hypocrite? Racial Correctness is not Racialism, it is the prerequisite for thinking at all. It just so happens that that prerequisite is enormously beneficial to Racialism.

"Neo-conservative" is generally a term of insult where I hail from. The "right wing" is generally corrupt and uninterested in conserving classical culture, heterosexuality, national sovereignty, the influence of Christ Jesus, Christmas celebrations, or anything else for that matter that doesn't involve shareholder portfolios or ever-increasing governmental force-projection. Here is an example of people who are fighting for the West:

Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement

Why would I insult you? I might remonstrate with you if I gather you are participating in improper activites or evil, but, insults are not appropriate, here.

h

Only liars would want to re-phrase what someone said like that.

Take this as advice.

The honest person maintains implied conversation - no need to add "insult", maybe more like "Why would I do that?"

Ciao.

PS. That and you seem very defensive.

PSS. I do not represent the majority here. They're quite nice folks.

Dear Sherab,

I do not understand what you have said to me, in your first three paragraphs. Please explain, if you would.

h

P.S.
Since P.S. stands for post-script, the sequel to P.S. is P.P.S. for post-post-script, not P.S.S.. Although trivial, this is another example of the ongoing decline of the West and forgetting of its heritage, from top to bottom.

Do you really think politics and written word are the future?

Anymore, people rely on more earthly tones for expression, namely, music, color, and art.

why would i want to be "racially incorrect"? well i suppose because i fell in love with and married someone from outside of my "race". because i chose to abandon the corrupt western christian ideals of my ancestors and follow a beautiful faith from a foriegn land.

and why would a christian seek assistance from hell-bound infidels like us? they wouldn't. you're obviously only here to stir up trouble.

good luck!

which is what i was alluding to when i mentioned his sue of words, posture, and the vibe i got from him, that he [i]lyig[.i] about his intentions, which he did not understand, when i said he was lying.

Clarifying for Mr. h - this isn't aimed at you Jasleen-ji.