Ek Ong Kaar - The Creator of All is One - Guru Ganesha Singh & Nirinjan Kaur

Originally Posted by prakash.s.bagga

It is a sheer shame how easily a Sikh can brand another Sikh as Hindu.This style of branding is Age old ,Nothing new for me.Such techiques are usually adopted by frustrated ones.
You can ask Forum admin To discontinue my registration if you feel so .
I hope you can easily do this being an important figure .
Prakash.S.Bagga.

Originally Posted by Tejwant Singh

Prakash Singh ji,

Guru Fateh.

There is nothing wrong with being a Hindu. You criticised Sikhs about their Sikhi in your posts. One can easily see when you call number ONE as EK when it is IK in Gurmurkhi. Only a person with the Hindi in mind not Gurmukhi would insist on that. I have posted many Shabads to show where you and your self concocted grammar rules where you insist Sanskrit rather than Gurmukhi are self evident.

A Sikh does not hate anyone but it is a duty of a Sikh to point out where hypocricy is involved by anyone, in this case you.

When I explained to you that the word omnipotence is linked to a deity like in Hinduism and other dogmatic religions, not to Sikhi when you claimed that omnipotence is linked to Harmander Sahib,you accused me of not knowing the words in Gurmukhi. So, it is ok for you to degrade or insult an Sikh.How interesting!

But despite that when the insult is ignored and you have been requested to point out the words, you backed down and kept mum as has been the case many times. Whenever you are challenged and asked to correct others who are wrong, you get mum all of a sudden. Is this the way a Sikh reacts when asked by another to be corrected?

Here is one of your own traps that you have fallen into:


http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurmat...tml#post158397

And here is your different pronunciation that you claimed was correct in another thread.

[U]
http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/gurmat...tml#post157827

So, which one of the above is the right one?

Prakash Singh ji,

Your contradictions speak for themselves. A Sikh teaches when asked to. You never did. A Sikh talks about Gurmukhi as it is in the Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, our only Guru, not refers to Sanskrit where it is not needed in Gurbani. And last but not the least IK is a number in Gurmukhi and EK is the number in Hindi and Sanskrit. The latter you insist on.

This forum welcomes to all, irrespective of anyone's hue, creed or faith but as a duty of any Sikh, hypocricy is pointed out where it is needed. Sikhi demands that.


Regards

Tejwant Singh

Originally Posted by prakash.s.bagga

I find that you are unable to catch the right point.My exlpanation for the pronunciation of the SYBOL you are is refering as EK Ong KAAR or EKANKAAR.is correct.
EK Ong Kaar is pronunciation for three three parts of the SYMBOL as separate.And the single word Pronunciation of EK Ong Kaar becomes as EKANKAAR.(You can confirm this from any scholar)
This SINGLE word EKANKAAR can also be seen in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji as EKANKAARu(The word EKANKAAR with a matra of AUKAD under R)
I dont see any sense of hypocricy except your own misconception about the Gurbani words.

Similarly if you carefully go thru Gurbani verses with words IK and EK I am sure you will get the understanding of the difference in application of the words IK and EK.
IK and EK both refer to Numerical Number One .The word IK is Definitive Numerical Adjective .This makes the difference in its application.
This can not be taught but can be understood by careful perusal of Gurbani words.
That is all for this.
With regardsand best wishes
Prakash.S.Bagga

Originally Posted by Tejwant Singh

Prakash Singh ji,

Guru Fateh.

You are contradiciting yourself and changing your tune as usual whenever challenged. And the other interesting part is that in the above post you cunningly erased your contradictory posts which were parts of my above post. It is called dishonesty in any religion.

I am not going to keep on posting your contradictory posts again and again. It is your duty as a human, no matter what religion you adhere to, to be honest and accept when you make the mistakes but it seems, honesty is not in your bag of trickeries.

Let me end with this. Whenever you post anything anti Gurmat and try to insert your Hindtuva mind set, you will be called for..


Now, be an honest human, please insert your two contradictory posts of yours that you cleverly omitted from my original post which is an anti Sikhi trait.

Hope you correct yourself and do not omit anything from others' posts either.

Tejwant Singh