Thread: Ek Omkar?
View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2006, 07:52 PM
Gyani Jarnail Singh's Avatar
Gyani Jarnail Singh Gyani Jarnail Singh is offline
SPN Sewadaar
 
Enrolled: Jul 2004
Location: KUALA LUMPUR MALAYSIA
Age: 59
Posts: 909
Blog Entries: 4
Re: Ek Omkar? >> Invite Your Friends

spot on papee ji.
in the SGGS..Guru Ji makes it absolutely clear how te words which may me confused are to be correctly pronounced.
1. to stop people from saying Mehla EK, Do, Tin chaar etc..it is written in WORDS..Pehla, DOOJa TEEJa Chautha Panjavan etc ( in strategic places)
2. To stop people thinking that a certain shabd is "double" entry and thus need not be read again..Guru Ji has written: EH Slok AAD aant parrhhnna.

Here in th e examples from Oankar bani of Guur nanak Ji Sahib..Guur Ji makes absolutley clear how the Open OOrra in Manglacharan at opening of SGGS is to be pronounced..and to make sure that we understand Oankaar is ONE..Guru Ji put EK in NUMERAL form in front of Oankaar.

In spite of such clear and unrefutable evidence as to what Guru ji means..some FOOLS still go on insisting that this is "OM"...derived from OM..vedas etc ( sorry to use the word but there is no other word to describe them) GURMATT of Guru Sahibs is NOT a vedic derivative...it is a compete NEW religious Philosophy..new ideas, new language, new script, new concepts..New Scriptures, New Spirit of Sacrifice New AMRIT....NEW EVERYTHING..

Gyani jarnail Singh




__________________
igAwnI jrnYl isMG iF`lo "ArSI" mlySIAw
Reply With Quote