Quote:
Originally Posted by Randip Singh  Hi All,
I had an e-mail from a friend who edits on wikipedia, on an account I used to have. He has come up against this article: Sunny Leone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He is trying to add in that Sunny Leone is not a practising Sikh, but there are a couple of editor there who I guess specialise in pornography who wish to delete what he wishes to add probably because they wish to publicise she is a Sikh for Sales.
In any case, shouldn't people like this be excommunicated formaly from Sikhi rather than people like Kala Afghana? I mean, Ok, if she wants to be a pornstar, that is fine, but why is she claiming to be a Sikh? Has she taken Amrit? does she wear the 5k's? At best she is an apostate Sikh?
Any views? |
If she considers herself to be sikh and believes in the teachings (as in believes tht there is a god and the gurus were true etc) can she not call herself a sikh?
im just saying that because, imagine a guy who cuts his hair, not taken amrit, but still goes gurdwara etc. many ppl will call tht guy a sikh right?
ur probably thinking leone cant be sikh cos she does porn which is breaking the rule about lust (1 of the 5 evils i think), but where do we draw the line? cos every human has imperfections and falls victim to them right?
e.g. many sikh guys will have a bmw/mercedes, when they could get around with a much cheaper car, and donate the rest of the money to charity. breaking the greed thing. (maybe thts a bad example but im just saying we all somehow break one of the 5 evils so who draws the line)