View Single Post
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 19-Aug-2010, 17:55 PM
Seeker9's Avatar Seeker9 Seeker9 is offline
Cleverness is not wisdom
 
Enrolled: May 3rd, 2010
Location: UK
Age: 41
Posts: 591
Seeker9 will become famous soon enoughSeeker9 will become famous soon enoughSeeker9 will become famous soon enoughSeeker9 will become famous soon enoughSeeker9 will become famous soon enoughSeeker9 will become famous soon enoughSeeker9 will become famous soon enough
   
Adherent: A Learner
Liked 870 Times in 397 Posts
    Nationality: United Kingdom
Re: Is halal meat scientifically proven right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by truefriend111 View Post
My DEar friend what ever you are telling is just baseless. But I said you with proof the name of the Scientist,where the experiment was conducted,etc.

Also u can posts the links whatever got to refute,i'll try to answer them.

In Halaal Slaughtering the blood drains out as compared to Stunning.Which today we know that blood is an good medium of Germs. If more blood remains in the meat, there are more chances of getting vulnerable to diseases. And as well as in Halaal Slaughtering there is less pain to the animal, as the results.

And these experiment was conducted not on personal views but by modern equipments.

Eventhough, Can i KNow the New Zealand Scientist's name and the result of the research.


Dear True Friend Ji

I am surprised you have asked for this as I think i gave you enough information in my last post to source these links yourself

However, seeing you have asked, here they are:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19225805.100-halalstandard-slaughtering-doesnt-need-animals-awake.html

http://www.grandin.com/ritual/slaughter.without.stunning.causes.pain.html

New Scientist is a respected and long-standing publication

The New Zealand study was conducted in 2009 and the link I have provided is a discussion paper dated February 2010, based on the New Zealand study

This appears to be much more up to date than the German study you quoted

It is not uncommon in the Scientific method for new research to supersede previous findings. So, I am quite happy to accept this new research, which by virtue of the fact the discussion paper is from a US University not involved in the original research project, has also now been independently reviewed and endorsed

I am no Scientist and I am assuming you are not either (forgive me if you are!)

Therefore, if you intend to refute the latest findings, please do so with rational arguments and not quotes from scripture

Thanks
Reply With Quote
The following members appreciate Seeker9 Ji for the above message.
 
Page generated in 0.13333 seconds with 24 queries