Quote:
Originally Posted by Seeker9  Dear True Friend Ji
I just googled "Halal Slaughter Science" and found a number of interesting links that refute what you have noted above
So there was a German study that said there was less pain??]
Well I've just come across a New Zealand study from 2009 that says there was more pain. I have also come across a New Scientist article stating stunning the animal has zero effect on blood loss and so should not be used as an excuse to not stun the animal
I therefore remain unconvinced by your argument |
My DEar friend what ever you are telling is just baseless. But I said you with proof the name of the Scientist,where the experiment was conducted,etc.
Also u can posts the links whatever got to refute,i'll try to answer them.
In Halaal Slaughtering the blood drains out as compared to Stunning.Which today we know that blood is an good medium of Germs. If more blood remains in the meat, there are more chances of getting vulnerable to diseases. And as well as in Halaal Slaughtering there is less pain to the animal, as the results.
And these experiment was conducted not on personal views but by modern equipments.
Eventhough, Can i KNow the New Zealand Scientist's name and the result of the research.