Nice to see you again.
I think you are unaware of Biblical Archeology. There are number of sites of Biblical Archeology but I am not quoting them since you don't want them. I am very glad to say that Bible is Archeologically accurate. You are asking to prove Miracles by archeology, and that's very hard but not entirely impossible. As I said in our previous discussion Bible is not the book of History though it is Historically accurate. Its purpose & message is not science but Salvation. Its important to quote scripture, without them you can not find any thing in archeology of the Bible. Unlike other religions, Biblical characters & events are not stories they are real . and its proven from the findings. Archeology supports Bible, which is contrary your expectations.
It is senseless to think that Jesus could have survived crucifixion. There are many proofs for His crucifixion & Death outside Bible and also for His Resurrection. What you mentioned as the tomb of Jesus, is a great Lie. That tomb is of "Yura Asaf" that has nothing to do with Jesus. He never came to India. He is not lying dead in any tomb like others He is Resurrected LORD. Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/christianity/31791-what-real-historical-archeological-evidence-exists.htmlReference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=31791
We can prove Bible archeologically. Now I want to ask you, "Can you prove Sikhism Archeologically?"
I again what to advice to don't just
look ant-christian material.