View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 19-Mar-2010, 22:04 PM
Randip Singh's Avatar Randip Singh Randip Singh is offline
 
Enrolled: May 25th, 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 43
Posts: 2,684
Randip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the roughRandip Singh is a jewel in the rough
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Liked 2,296 Times in 1,009 Posts
    Nationality: United Kingdom
Exclamation Re: Disabled people & Reht Maryada

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atheist View Post
Dear Everyone,

So I was reading the vegetarianism forum here, and there was a mention of the Reht (or Rehat) Maryada. I started reading it and as it described the Amrit (baptism) I came across this paragraph (copied directly from this page: Sikh Reht Maryada, The Definition of Sikh, Sikh Conduct & Conventions, Sikh Religion Living, India):

c. The five beloved (Panj Piyare) ones who administer ambrosial baptism not include a disabled person, such as a person who is blind or blind in one eye, lame, one with a broken or disabled limb, or one suffering from some chronic disease. The number should not include anyone who has committed a breach of the Sikh discipline and principles. All of them should be committed baptised Sikhs with appealing personalities.

I made sure to read before and after this paragraph to try to make sure I was not taking it out of context. Granted the Reht Maryada was not written by the Gurus; my understanding is that it was (is?) written by people so that Sikhs could have a guide. So my question is why would the authors of the Reht Maryada say that the people who give the Amrit cannot be disabled, blind, or with a chronic disease?
As a Sikh you would be called on to defend fight etc and not shirk from that duty. Its like a military induction.

Asking someone who is impaired in some way to fight would be just wrong.

They need to explain it better though.
Reply With Quote
The following members appreciate Randip Singh Ji for the above message.
 
Page generated in 0.10680 seconds with 24 queries