Originally Posted by Caspian

Just for example's sake (because you have no provided me with one) lets assume that I was beggining this debate in a Christian thread instead of a Sikh thread (because I don't have time to go over the Mool Manter and all that right now). Now, i would start off my debate in the very same way—posting my argument and on that christian forum, a "Christian-Tejwant" would ask me to define the christian god in specific. Now aside from the omni-qualities i did define the christian god with (omnicience, omnipotence and omnipresance) I know that the christian god is suppose to be Loving, Jealous, Vengeful (at times), Part of the holy trinity (and i can go on and on about his other characteristics). Are any of these characterisitics important to my argument ? Of course not—but if any of the christians felt like they were important to my argument, its their duty to bring them up. For example, a 'Christian-Tejwant" might want to use an argument about God's capability for infinite love to dispell my argument ( just an example). But it is not my duty to distincly define any other characteristics of god that I find unneccsary to my example, it is your job to attack my definition if you see it as unfit and so far i have no seen you say "your definition is wrong" instead you keep asking me to include the entire definition of the sikh god but like my example of the christian god, there are many unneccesary qualities that arent needed for my argument.