View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-Nov-2009, 01:28 AM
kds1980's Avatar kds1980 kds1980 is offline
(previously Kanwardeep Singh)
 
Enrolled: Apr 4th, 2005
Location: INDIA
Age: 31
Posts: 4,257
kds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond reputekds1980 has a reputation beyond repute
   
Adherent: Sikhism
Thanks: 332
Thanked 2,372 Times in 1,233 Posts
    Nationality: India
Re: Obama to skip Tibet while talking about human rights in Asia

Quote:
However, US foreign policy is so complex that one should not generalize from the position of the US on Tibet to the US foreign policy toward India as a whole. Again, I personally believe that the US has not been the brightest star with regard to this issue. But there are so many angles to this problem -- many of which do not get expressed in the mass media.
I am not generalising US on policy Tibet as US foreign policy towards China but still By not meeting dalai Lama and now silence on Tibet shows China's strength.US is neither a friend of China or India neither it is enemy.US is only with the country where their own benefit lie.
Even In second world war US did not enter unless they were attacked by Japan.Infact
What i read is that in German soviet war they were planning to help Nazi's incase soviet was winning and help soviet incase nazi's are winning.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13314 seconds with 24 queries