Kanwardeep ji

The US policy stated here regards Tibet. I personally think that President Obama is on the wrong track as regards Tibet.

However, US foreign policy is so complex that one should not generalize from the position of the US on Tibet to the US foreign policy toward India as a whole. Again, I personally believe that the US has not been the brightest star with regard to this issue. But there are so many angles to this problem -- many of which do not get expressed in the mass media.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/world/27498-obama-skip-tibet-while-talking-about.html

And the US the mass media is too stupid to pick up on when it actually hears pro-India policies explained. Another personal opinion, the media (print and electronic) in the US is mentally challenged as a group -- there are a few exceptions. To get to the bottom of things any one individual has to do a lot of digging.

One thing you will not hear because of Pakistan. You will not hear a plain-spoken and clear endorsement of India. That is because Pakistan is a nuclear ammunition dump on the cusp of exploding. To keep it from exploding a lot of "players" in the region have to be juggled about. So the average person is not going to know what the actual US foreign policy commitments in fact are given any single issue pertaining to the region.
Reference:: Sikh Philosophy Network http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/showthread.php?t=27498

An excellent article. And thanks. It almost makes sense to start a thread or several threads on US policy toward India because I myself have a lot of questions. Why not go for it?